A review of published studies reveals that the cost of comparable manual and on-line searches are approximately equal. The cost of on-line searching has decreased during the last decade mainly because of diminished data processing and telecommunications charges. There are some indications that expected future reductions in these cost components may be, to some extent, offset by increasing data base royalty charges. The relative effectiveness of manual and on-line search in terms of performance measures (e.g. recall and pre cision) seems to depend on a number of factors which include specificity of search and the nature of the data base.
D.R. Elchesen , Cost-effectiveness of manual and on-line retrospective bibliographic searching, JASIS (March 1978 ) 56-66.
2.
M.E. Williams and E. Brandhorst, Data bases in 1978, Bull. ASIS4(6) (1978) 20-26.
3.
M.E. Williams , Criteria for evaluation and selection of data bases and data base services. Special Libs1975, 66, no. 12, 561-569.
4.
Flynn et al., Cost effectiveness comparison of on-line and manual bibliographic information retrieval, J. Information Sci.1(2) (1979) 77-84.
5.
S.M. Johnston and D.E. Gray, Comparison of manual and on-line retrospective searching for agricultural subjects, Aslib Proc., 29(7) (1977) 253-258.
6.
F.B. Rogers , Costs of operating an information retrieval service, Drexel Lib. Quart.4(4) (1968) 271-278.
7.
M.M. Bivans , A comparison of manual and machine literature searches, Spec. Libs. 65 (5,6) 216-222.
8.
S.A. Elman , Cost comparisons of manual and on-line computerized literature searching, Spec. Libs.66 (1) (1975) 12-18.
9.
J.M. Maier , The scientist versus machine search services: we are the missing link, Spec. Libs.65(4) (1974) 180-188.
10.
J.P. Colthurst and M.E. Shilling, On-line searching in a research environment , On-line1(4) (1977) 311-317.
11.
R.G. Smith , Before you scrap the old ways, compare retrieval systems, manual vs. on-lineOn-line1(2) (1977) 26-27, 51-59.
12.
A.R. Blick , Letter to the Editor, J. Information Sci.1(4) ( 1979) 236-237.
13.
W.E. Bridgeam and E. Meyerhoff, Library participation in a biomedical communication and information network, Bull. Medical Library Assoc.58(2) (1970) 102-111.
14.
C.P. Brown, E.J. Yeates and M. Van Hoesen, Use and cost of on-line systems at the National Bureau of Standards Library, Final Report, 1 March 1974 to 30 March 1975, in: Information Revolution, Proc. Thirty-Eight Annual Meeting, ASIS, Boston, MA, 1975 October 26-30, Volume 12 (ASIS, 1975) Washington, DC, 132-133.
15.
H.F. Dammers , "The economics of computer-based information systems: a review", J. Documentation, 31(1) (1975) 38-45.
16.
D.T. Hawkins , Impact of On-line Systems on a Literature Searching Service, Special Libraries67(12) (1976) 559-567.
17.
F.W. Lancaster and E.G. Fayen, 1974. Information Retrieval on-line (Melville, Los Angeles, CA, (1973).
18.
D.J. Morton , On-line experience (Letter), Special Libraries65(5,6) (1974) 5A.
19.
M.S. Radwin, "The new era of on-line information retrieval: evaluation of its costs and benefits - a professional imperative", in: H.J. Waldron and F.R. Long, (Eds.), Innovative Development in Information Systems: Their Benefits and Costs, Proc. Thirty-Sixth Annual Meeting, ASIS, Los Angeles, CA, October 21-25, 1973, Volume 10. Greenwood, Westport, G. 1973) 191-192.
20.
G.K. Thompson , Some cost estimates for bibliographic searching in a large-scale social sciences information system, Information Storage and Retrieval6(2) (1970) 179-186.
21.
H. Wilman and A.M. Hall, An experiment in the Batch Processing of retrospective searches, Institution of Electrical Engineers, INSPEC, London , England (1973). Report No. R73/13, OSTI Report 5157.
22.
Redstone Scientific Information Center, Cost Effectiveness of the DDC On-line Retrieval System at Redston Scientific Information Center (RSIC, Redstone Arsenal, Huntsville, AL, August 1972).
23.
J.S. Buckley , Jr., Planning for effective use of on-line systems , J. Chem. Information Comput. Sci.15(3) (1975) 161-164.
24.
E.D. Gill, A comparison of manual and computer searches of the chemical evolution and origin of life literature, University, Department of Librarianship, San Jose State Univ. San Jose, CA (January 1974). ED-092114.
25.
E.C. Goodliffe and S.J. Nayler, On-line Information Retrieval: some comments on the use of RETROSPEC in an industrial library, Aslib Proc . 26 (1974) 117-188.
26.
R.E. Hoover , Patron appraisal of on-line bibliographic retrieval services, J. Lib. Automation9 (1978) 335-350.
27.
Hawkins et al., Computer aided information retrieval in a large industrial libray, in: F.W. Lancaster, (Ed.), Proc. 1975 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, ( University Illinois Graduate School of Library Science, 1975) 31-34.
28.
H.R. Collier , Long term economics of on-line services ..., Aslib Proc. 30(1) (1978) 16-24.
29.
E.D. Barraclough , Progress in documentation, On-line searching in information retrieval, J. Documentation33(3) (1977) 220-238.
30.
C. Cleverdon , Letter to the Editor, J. Information Sci. 1(4) ( 1979) 237-238.
31.
P.R. Langley , A comparison between mail-access computer and manual literature searching, RQ15(3) (1976) 229-232.
32.
C.J. Michaels , Searching CA Condensates on-line vs. the CA Keyword indexes, J. Chem. Information Comput. Sci.15(3) (1975) 172-173.
33.
I.B. Hansen, CA Condensates as a retrospective research tool, Information Storage and Retrieval9 (1973) 201-205.
34.
Barraclough et al., The Medusa current awareness experiment, The University of Newcastle Upon Tyne, Computing Laboratory Technical Report no. 34 (June 1972).
35.
Olive et al., Studies to compare retrieval using titles with that using index terms, SDI from Nuclear Science Abstracts, J. Documentation29(2) ( 1973) 169-191.
36.
A.R. Blick and D.S. Magrill, The effect of the introduction of on-line facilities on the choice of search tools, Information Scientist , 1978, 12(1) (1978) 25-31.
37.
H.L. Fisher and D.R. Elchesen, Effectiveness of combining title words and index terms in machine retrieval searches, Nature238(5359) (1972) 109-110.
38.
J.R. Byrne , Relative effectiveness of titles, abstracts and index terms in machine retrieval searches, JASIS26(4) (1975) 223)229.
39.
M. Ohta, A comparison of some demand subject searches: machines vs. human, Medical Lib. Assoc. Bull.55 (1967 ) 408-415.
40.
J.S. Buckley , Planning for effective use of on-line systems , J. Chem. Information Comput. Sci.15(3) (1975) 161-164.
41.
J. Santodonato , A comparison of on-line and manual modes of searching Chemical Abstracts for specific compounds, J. Chem. Information and Comput. Sci.16(3) (1976) 135-137.
42.
R.E. Buntrock , Searching Chemical Abstracts vs. Chemical Condensates , J. Chem. Information Comput. Sci.15(3) (1975) 174-176.
43.
H.F. Dammers , The economics of computer-based information systems: a review, J. Documentation31(1) (1975) 38-45.
44.
A.K. Kent, Dial-up and die: can information systems survive the on-line age? Paper presented at the 6th Cranfield Annual Conference, 1977.
45.
T.P. Barwise , The cost of literature search in 1985, J. Information Sci.1(4) (1979) 195-201.
46.
J. Page, Charges applied for on-line use of data bases: charging practices of data base producers, Commission of the European Communities , Luxembourg, 1978.
47.
T.P. Barwise , On-line searching: the impact on user charges of the extended use of on-line services, Office for Official Publications European CommunitiesLuxembourg, 1979. Eur 6250.
48.
A.D.K.J. Flowerdew , et al., Demand for on-line information services as a function of the charges, Report to the European Commission, July 1976.
49.
J. Akeroyd, and R. Rogers, On-line information retrieval: a comparison of manual and machine searching, BLRD Report 5370 (February 1976).
50.
M.S. Magson , Modelling on-line cost effectiveness, Aslib Proc. 32(1) (1980) 35-43.
51.
J. Wish et al., Terminal costs for on-line searching, College and Research Libraries (July 1977) 291-297.
