A model is proposed for the investigation of the cost- effectiveness of interactive online searching, as an aid towards justification of expenditure to senior management. It is concluded that online bibliographic literature retrieval is considerably more cost-effective than traditional library manual searching, as well as providing additional qualitative advantages.
A.R. HaygarthJackson, P.A. Holohan and M.J. Shether.On-line retrieval of bibliographic information: Its introduction and evaluation based on the first years experience, Information Scientist12 (1) (1978) 9-24;
2.
J.P. Colthurst and M.E. Shilling,, On-line searching in a research environment , On-line Rev.1 (4) (1977) 311-317.
3.
M.E. Williams , Networks for on-line data base access, J. Amer. Soc. Information Sci. (1977) 247-253.
4.
D. Magrill , Information at the touch of a button, New Scientist (1978) 76-79.
5.
H.R. CollierLong-term economics of on-line services, Proc. Aslib30 (1) (1978) 16-24.
6.
D.B. McCarn.Trends in information, Proc. ASIS, 37th Annual Meeting, Atlanta, ( 1974).
7.
S.A. Elman , Cost comparisons of manual and on-line computerized literature searching, Special Libraries66 (1975) 12-18.
8.
R.E. Hoover , Patron appraisal of computer aided on-line bibliographic retrieval services. J. Library Automation9 (1976) 335-350.
9.
E.D. Barraclough , Progress in documentation: On-line searching in information retrieval, J. Documentation (3) ( 1977) 220-238.
10.
Report analyzing and forecasting " The computerized data bases market". Frost and Sullivan, Inc. Communication 1978.
11.
J. Swatz, Information Hotline (January 1978) 6-7. Data base industry to grow to S 1.6 billion by 1985; Up from $ 740 million in 1976.
12.
M.S. Radwin , The new era of information retrieval, evaluation of its costs and benefits - a professional imperative, Proc. ASIS10 (1973) 191-192.
13.
C.A. Cuadra , Commercially funded on-line retrieval services - past, present and future. Proc. Aslib30 ( 1) (1978) 2-15.
14.
M.J. Ruhl and E.J. Yeates, Introducing and implementing on-line bibliographic retrieval services in a scientific research and development organisation of chemical information, Company Science16 (3) (1976) 147-151.
15.
D.T. Hawkins , Impact of on-line systems on a literature searching service, Special libraries67 (12) (1976) 559-567.
16.
S.M. Johnston , Comparison of manual and on-line retrospective searching for agricultural subjects, Proc. Aslib29 (7) (1977) 253-258.
17.
B.G. Prewith , On-line searching of computer data bases. J. Chem. Doc.14 (3) (1974) 115-117).
18.
A.R. Blick and D.S. Magrill, The effect of the introduction of on-line facilities on the choice of search tools. Information Scientist12 (1) ( 1978) 25-31.
19.
A.E. Negus, Euronet guideline: Standard commands for retrieval systems, Inspec. (December 1977).
20.
D.R. Elchesen , Cost-effectiveness comparison of manual and on-line retrospective bibliographic searching. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. (March 1978) 56-66.
21.
M.S. Magson, Techniques for the Measurement of Cost-Benefit in Information Centres. Proc. Aslib25 (5) (1973) 164-185.
22.
M.M. Bivans , A Comparison of Manual and Machine Literature Searches. Special Libraries65 (5, 6) ( 1974) 216-222.
23.
J.M. Maier , The scientist versus machine search services: We are the missing link. Special Libraries65 (4) (1974) 180-188.
24.
F.B. Rogers , Costs of operating an information retrieval service, Drexel Library Quart.4 (4) (1968) 271-278.
