This article introduces ThemeScope, an analytical strategy for mapping the discursive traces of social representations across large-scale digital arenas. Grounded in social representation theory (SRT), it operationalises anchoring and objectification as discourse-analytic indicators computed ex post from co-occurrence structure and lexical concreteness. ThemeScope employs network analysis of word co-occurrences and visualisation techniques adapted from science mapping to identify and categorise lexical-thematic communities based on their structural organisation. We propose two quantitative measures to assess anchoring and objectification ex post and show the method’s interpretive potential within online discussions. This integrated framework bridges theoretical insight and computational scalability, providing a replicable approach to studying meaning-making processes in digital discourse.
SievertCShirleyK. LDAvis: a method for visualizing and interpreting topics. In: ChuangJGreenSHearstM, et al (eds) Proceedings of the workshop on interactive language learning, visualization, and interfaces. ACL, 2014, pp.63–70. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/W14-3110
3.
BonifaziGCauteruccioFCorradiniE, et al. Representation, detection and usage of the content semantics of comments in a social platform. J Inf Sci2024; 50: 317–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515221087663
4.
PoschmannP. Capturing institutional logics and the construction of digital technologies: a macro-discursive perspective using formal text analysis methods. Inf Organ2025; 35: 100598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2025.100598
5.
WodakRMeyerM. Methods of critical discourse studies. Sage, 2015.
6.
CastellsM. Networks of outrage and hope: social movements in the Internet age. Wiley, 2012.
7.
NelsonLK. Leveraging the alignment between machine learning and intersectionality: using word embeddings to measure intersectional experiences of the nineteenth century U.S. South. Poetics2021; 88: 101539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2021.101539
8.
MohrJWWagner-PacificiRBreigerRL, et al. Graphing the grammar of motives in national security strategies: cultural interpretation, automated text analysis and the drama of global politics. Poetics2013; 41: 670–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2013.08.003
9.
BonikowskiBLuoYStuhlerO. Politics as usual? Measuring populism, nationalism, and authoritarianism in U.S. Presidential campaigns (1952-2020) with neural language models. Sociol Methods Res2022; 51: 1721–1787. https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241221122317
10.
MoscoviciS. La psychanalyse, son image et son public. Presses Universitaires de France, 1961.
11.
MarkováI. Dialogicality and social representations: the dynamics of mind. Cambridge University Press, 2003.
12.
MangiòFPedelientoGWasslerP, et al. Discursively negotiating AI: a social representation theory approach to LLM-based chatbots. Technol Forecast Soc Chang2025; 221: 124352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124352
13.
HowarthC. A social representation is not a quiet thing: exploring the critical potential of social representations theory. Br J Soc Psychol2006; 45: 65–86. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466605X43777
14.
MoscoviciS. The phenomenon of social representations. In: FarrRMMoscoviciS (eds) Social representations. Cambridge University Press, 1984, pp.3–69.
15.
MisuracaMSpanoM. Unsupervised analytic strategies to explore large document collections. In: IezziDMayaffeDMisuracaM (eds) Text analytics: advances and challenges. Springer, 2020, pp.17–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52680-1_2
RateauPMolinerPGuimelliC, et al. Social representations theory: a progressive research program for social psychology. J Theory Soc Behav2011; 41: 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2010.00403.x
18.
MachinDMayrA. How to do critical discourse analysis: a multimodal introduction. Sage, 2012.
19.
DoiseW. Représentations sociales chez des élèves: effets du statut scolaire et de l’origine sociale. Rev Suisse Psychol1985; 44: 67–78.
20.
AbricJ-C. Central system, peripheral system: their functions and roles in the dynamics of social representations. Pap Soc Represent1993; 2: 75–78.
21.
AbricJ-C. A structural approach to social representations. In: DeauxKPhilogèneG (eds) Representations of the social. Blackwell, 2001, pp.42–47.
22.
Lo MonacoGPiermattéoARateauP, et al. Methods for studying the structure of social representations: a critical review and agenda for future research. J Theory Soc Behav2017; 47: 306–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12124
QiQHessenDJDeoskarT, et al. A comparison of latent semantic analysis and correspondence analysis of document-term matrices. Nat Lang Eng2024; 30: 722–752. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1351324923000244
27.
de RosaASBocciEBonitoM, et al. Twitter as social media arena for polarised social representations about the (im)migration: the controversial discourse in the Italian and international political frame. Migr Stud2021; 9: 1167–1194. https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnab001
28.
Boccia ArtieriGGrecoFLa RoccaG. The construction of the meanings of #coronavirus on Twitter: an analysis of the initial reactions of the Italian people. Int Rev Sociol2021; 31: 287–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2021.1947950
MetastasioRBocciEPassafaroP, et al. The social representation of sustainable mobility: an exploratory investigation on social media networks. Sustainability2024; 16: 2833. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072833
31.
Di CiccoGPrisleiLSensalesG. Italian populist leaders and their followers on Facebook (2019–2022): representational fields and empirical evidence from a psycho-social linguistic perspective. In: SensalesG (ed) Political psychology perspectives on populism. Springer Nature, 2024, pp.347–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44073-1_9
SterlingJJostJTHardinCD. Liberal and conservative representations of the good society: a (social) structural topic modeling approach. Sage Open2019; 9: 2158244019846211. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019846211
36.
ChenAZhangJLiaoW, et al. Multiplicity and dynamics of social representations of the COVID-19 pandemic on Chinese social media from 2019 to 2020. Inf Process Manag2022; 59: 102990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2022.102990
BernhardJTeuffenbachMBoomgaardenHG. Topic model validation methods and their impact on model selection and evaluation. Comput Commun Res2023; 5: 1–26. https://doi.org/10.5117/CCR2023.1.13.BERN
RadicchiFCastellanoCCecconiF, et al. Defining and identifying communities in networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci2004; 101: 2658–2663. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0400054101
41.
RizzoliVda SilveiraAMDe Falco, et al. Two sides of the same coin: how to integrate social network analysis and topic detection to investigate shared contents and communicative interactions in social representations. Int Rev Soc Psychol2024; 37: 21. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.973
42.
ZhangZJinJLuoC, et al. Excavating the social representations and perceived barriers of organ donation in China over the past decade: a hybrid text analysis approach. Front Public Health2022; 10: 998737. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.998737
XingYZhangJZ. Metaverse maelstrom: dissecting information dynamics and polarisation. J Inf Sci. Epub ahead of print 3 January2025. https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515241307546
45.
MisuracaMScepiGSpanoM. Network-based dimensionality reduction for textual datasets. In: BrentariEChiodiMWitE-JC (eds) Models for data analysis. Springer, 2023, pp.175–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15885-8_12
46.
CallonMCourtialJ-PLavilleW. From translations to problematic networks: an introduction to co-word analysis. Soc Sci Inf1983; 22: 191–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/05390188302200200
47.
van EckNJWaltmanL. How to normalise co-occurrence data? An analysis of some well-known similarity measures. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol2009; 60: 1635–1651. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21075
48.
ChaudhariDLDamaniOPLaxmanS (eds). Lexical co-occurrence, statistical significance, and word association. In: Proceedings of the conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP’11). Association for Computational Linguistics, 2011, pp.1058–1068.
49.
CallonMCourtialJPLavilleF. Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: the case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics1991; 22: 155–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019280
CoboMLópez-HerreraAHerrera-ViedmaE, et al. An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: a practical application to the fuzzy sets theory field. J Informetr2011; 5: 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002
52.
AriaMCuccurulloCD’AnielloL, et al. Thematic analysis as a new culturomic tool: the social media coverage on COVID-19 pandemic in Italy. Sustainability2022; 14: 3643. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su14063643
NortonMMoloneyGSutherlandM, et al. “Hoping for life means waiting for death”: emotional anchoring and themata in media reporting on paediatric organ donation. J Community Appl Soc Psychol2021; 31: 537–556. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2539
55.
de Saint LaurentCGlăveanuVPLiteratI. Mimetic representations of the COVID-19 pandemic: an analysis of objectification, anchoring, and identification processes in coronavirus memes. Psychol Pop Media2022; 11: 340–354. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000370
VergèsP. Approche du noyau central: propriétés quantitatives et structurales. In: GuimelliC (ed) Structures et transformations des représentations sociales. Delachaux et Niestlé, 1994, pp.233–253.
58.
DanyLUrdapilletaILo MonacoG. Free associations and social representations: some reflections on rank-frequency and importance-frequency methods. Qual Quant2015; 49: 489–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0005-z
59.
HöijerB. Emotional anchoring and objectification in the media reporting on climate change. Public Underst Sci2010; 19: 717–731. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662509348863
60.
FoxJBailensonJNTricaseL. The embodiment of sexualized virtual selves: the Proteus effect and experiences of self-objectification via avatars. Comput Human Behav2013; 29: 930–938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.027
61.
BrysbaertMWarrinerABKupermanV. Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behav Res2014; 46: 904–911. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0403-5
62.
MontefineseMAmbrosiniEFairfieldB, et al. The adaptation of the affective norms for English words (ANEW) for Italian. Behav Res2014; 46: 887–903. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0405-3
63.
BoninPMéotABugaiskaA. Concreteness norms for 1,659 French words: relationships with other psycholinguistic variables and word recognition times. Behav Res2018; 50: 2366–2387. https://doi.org/10.3758/ s13428-018-1014-y
64.
AriaMSpanoMD’AnielloL, et al. TALL: text analysis for all – an interactive R-Shiny application for exploring, modeling, and visualizing textual data. SoftwareX2026; 34: 102590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2026.102590
MassanariA. Participatory culture, community, and play: learning from Reddit. Peter Lang Publishing, 2015.
69.
CinelliMMoralesGDFGaleazziA, et al. The echo chamber effect on social media. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA2021; 118: e2023301118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023301118
YangZAlgesheimerRTessoneCJ. A comparative analysis of community detection algorithms on artificial networks. Sci Rep2016; 6: 30750. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep30750
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
