Evolution mechanism of scientific topics using inheritance and variation features of knowledge genes: A case study in the hematopoietic stem-cell field
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
Evolution mechanism of scientific topics using inheritance and variation features of knowledge genes: A case study in the hematopoietic stem-cell field
This study explores the key factors and internal driving forces of knowledge creation by constructing a research framework for the evolution of knowledge genes. The evolutionary mechanism of scientific topics is examined through the inheritance and variation characteristics of knowledge genes. Subject–predicate–object triples are used to identify knowledge gene topics, which are further categorised into four types based on their stability and variation features. A knowledge gene evolution path is then developed using content similarity and inheritance across adjacent time slices. Multidimensional feature analysis is applied to explore the inheritance and variation dynamics of these knowledge genes. A case study in the hematopoietic stem cells field, supported by literature validation and expert consultation, demonstrates the effectiveness of this method in enhancing the understanding of the knowledge innovation mechanism.
ZengAShenZZhouJ, et al. The science of science: from the perspective of complex systems. Phys Rep2017; 714: 1–73.
2.
KedrickKLevitskayaEFunkRJ.Conceptual structure and the growth of scientific knowledge. Nat Hum Behav2024; 8: 1915–1923.
3.
XuHLuoRWinninkJ, et al. A methodology for identifying breakthrough topics using structural entropy. Inf Process Manag2022; 59: 102862.
4.
WuHLuoRXuH, et al. Review on the research of innovative evolving trajectory recognition from the Perspective of science and technology correlation. Inf Stud Appl2018; 41: 137–143.
5.
KuhnT.The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.
6.
FortunatoSBergstromCTBörnerK, et al. Science of science. Science2018; 359: eaao0185.
7.
YangJHuJ.Scientific knowledge role transition prediction from a knowledge hierarchical structure perspective. J Informetr2025; 19: 101612.
8.
MertonRK.The sociology of science: theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973.
9.
AndersenHBarkerPChenX.The cognitive structure of scientific revolutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
10.
ZhangHXuHLiuC, et al. Exploring and anticipating early detection methods for scientific and technological weak signals. J China Soc Sci Tech Inf2024; 43: 1129–1141.
11.
LiangZLiuFMaoJ, et al. A knowledge representation model for studying knowledge creation, usage, and evolution. In: ToeppeKYanHChuSKW, eds. Diversity, divergence, dialogue. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021, pp. 97–111.
12.
XuHWinninkJWuH, et al. Using the catastrophe theory to discover transformative research topics. Res Eval2022; 31: 61–79.
13.
ChengYHuangLRamloganR, et al. Forecasting of potential impacts of disruptive technology in promising technological areas: elaborating the SIRS epidemic model in RFID technology. Technol Forecast Soc Change2017; 117: 170–183.
14.
WangYDingY.Construction and simulation of the transmission model of scientific literature dissemination networks based on the perspective of knowledge evolution. J China Soc Sci Tech Inf2019; 38: 966–973.
15.
ChavalariasDCointetJP.Phylomemetic patterns in science evolution – the rise and fall of scientific fields. PLoS ONE2013; 8: e54847.
16.
DawkinsR.The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976.
17.
SenS.A note on the idea gene and its relevance to information science. Ann Libr Sci Doc1981; 28: 97–102.
HeSZhengXWangJ, et al. Meme extraction and tracing in crisis events. In: 2016 IEEE conference on intelligence and security informatics (ISI), Tucson, AZ, 28–30 September 2016, pp. 61–66. New York: IEEE.
22.
LiXWangY.A novel integrated approach for quantifying the convergence of disruptive technologies from science to technology. Technol Forecast Soc Change2024; 209: 123825.
23.
BaiRZhangQSunY.A study of knowledge meme heredity and mutation in academic paper. Libr Inf Serv2020; 64: 78–87.
24.
ChenLZhangZ.Development of technological evolution research methods. Libr Inf Serv2012; 56: 59–66.
25.
KeeneySHassonFMcKennaH.Consulting the oracle: ten lessons from using the Delphi technique in nursing research. J Adv Nurs2006; 53: 205–212.
26.
The evolution of science. Science1965; 148: 737–737.
27.
PriceDJ.Networks of scientific papers. Science1965; 149: 510–515.
28.
HummonNPDoreianP.Connectivity in a citation network: the development of DNA theory. Soc Netw1989; 11: 39–63.
29.
XuHWinninkJPangH, et al. Breakthrough potential of emerging research topics based on citation diffusion features. J Inf Sci2023; 49: 1390–1416.
30.
YuDYanZ.Main path analysis considering citation structure and content: case studies in different domains. J Informetr2023; 17: 101381.
31.
GarfieldE.Can citation indexing be automated. In: StevensMEGiulianoVE eds. Statistical association methods for mechanized documentation, symposium proceedings. Washington: Publication National Bureau of Standards, 1965, pp. 189–192.
32.
MilojevićS.Quantifying the cognitive extent of science. J Informetr2015; 9: 962–973.
33.
ParkMLeaheyEFunkRJ.Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time. Nature2023; 613: 138–144.
34.
ColeS.Why sociology doesn’t make progress like the natural sciences. Sociol Forum1994; 9: 133–154.
35.
KuhnTS.The structure of scientific revolutions. Phys Today1962; 16: 69–69.
36.
PopperKR.Conjectures and refutations: the growth of scientific knowledge. London: Routledge, 1962.
37.
ColeS.Disciplinary knowledge revisited: the social construction of sociology. Am Sociol2006; 37: 4156.
38.
LakatosIMusgraveA.Criticism and the growth of knowledge: proceedings of the international colloquium in the philosophy of science, London, 1965. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.
39.
LaudanL.Progress and its problems: towards a theory of scientific growth. Oakland, CA: University of California Press, 1978.
40.
WuQZhangCHongQ, et al. Topic evolution based on LDA and HMM and its application in stem cell research. J Inf Sci2014; 40: 611–620.
41.
FengFWuJChiQ, et al. Lactylome analysis unveils lactylation-dependent mechanisms of stemness remodeling in the liver cancer stem cells. Adv Sci2024; 11: 2405975.
42.
ZhaoMKangMWangJ, et al. Stem cell-derived nanovesicles embedded in dual-layered hydrogel for programmed ros regulation and comprehensive tissue regeneration in burn wound healing. Adv Mater2024; 36: e2401369.
43.
YaoXXieRZanX, et al. A novel image encryption scheme for DNA storage systems based on DNA hybridization and gene mutation. Interdiscip Sci Comput Life Sci2023; 15: 419–432.
44.
YoonJParkHKimK.Identifying technological competition trends for R&D planning using dynamic patent maps: SAO-based content analysis. Scientometrics2013; 94: 313–331.
45.
LiuZFengJUdenL.Technology opportunity analysis using hierarchical semantic networks and dual link prediction. Technovation2023; 128: 102872.
46.
LiangZMaoJCaoY, et al. Knowledge diffusion pattern analysis based on knowledge meme cascade networks. Inf Stud Appl2020; 43: 40–46.
47.
LuWTanZ.Domain topic evolution based on the dissociation and recombination of knowledge genes. Inf Stud Appl2019; 42: 101–107.
48.
MaoJLiangZCaoY, et al. Quantifying cross-disciplinary knowledge flow from the perspective of content: introducing an approach based on knowledge memes. J Informetr2020; 14: 101092.
49.
PintoHAlmeidaJMGonçalvesMA.Using early view patterns to predict the popularity of youtube videos. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2013, pp. 365–374.
50.
MaZSunACongG.On predicting the popularity of newly emerging hashtags in t witter. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol2013; 64: 1399–1410.
51.
YangCHuangCSuJ.An improved SAO network-based method for technology trend analysis: a case study of graphene. J Informetr2018; 12: 271–286.
52.
YoonJ.Detecting weak signals for long-term business opportunities using text mining of web news. Expert Syst Appl2012; 39: 12543–12550.
53.
GhawiRPfefferJ.A community matching based approach to measuring layer similarity in multilayer networks. Soc Netw2022; 68: 1–14.
DotsikaFWatkinsA.Identifying potentially disruptive trends by means of keyword network analysis. Technol Forecast Soc Change2017; 119: 114–127.
59.
BodenreiderO.The unified medical language system (UMLS): integrating biomedical terminology. Nucleic Acids Res2004; 32: D267–270.
60.
KilicogluHRosemblatGFiszmanM, et al. Broad-coverage biomedical relation extraction with SemRep. BMC Bioinformatics2020; 21: 1–28.
61.
LiXLiJLiD.Research on the unified medical language system and its application to knowledge discovery. Digit Libr Forum2019; 9: 24–29.
62.
RindfleschTCFiszmanM.The interaction of domain knowledge and linguistic structure in natural language processing: interpreting hypernymic propositions in biomedical text. J Biomed Inform2003; 36: 462–477.
63.
BlondelVDGuillaumeJLLambiotteR, et al. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J Stat Mech Theory Exp2008; 2008: P10008.
64.
VeltenLHaasSFRaffelS, et al. Human haematopoietic stem cell lineage commitment is a continuous process. Nat Cell Biol2017; 19: 271–281.
65.
SugimuraRJhaDKHanA, et al. Haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells from human pluripotent stem cells. Nature2017; 545: 432–438.
66.
BakRODeverDPPorteusMH.CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in human hematopoietic stem cells. Nat Protoc2018; 13: 358–376.
67.
MangeotPERissonVFusilF, et al. Genome editing in primary cells and in vivo using viral-derived Nanoblades loaded with Cas9-sgRNA ribonucleoproteins. Nat Commun2019; 10: 1–15.
68.
OzonoYShideKKamedaT, et al. Neoplastic fibrocytes play an essential role in bone marrow fibrosis in Jak2V617F-induced primary myelofibrosis mice. Leukemia2021; 35: 454–467.
BleiDMLaffertyJD.Dynamic topic models. In: Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on Machine learning. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2006, pp. 113–120.
72.
BaiHChenZLyuMR, et al. Neural relational topic models for scientific article analysis. In: CuzzocreaAAllanJPatonNW eds. Proceedings of the 27th ACM international conference on information and knowledge management. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2018, pp. 27–36.
73.
ChenHWangXPanS, et al. Identify topic relations in scientific literature using topic modeling. IEEE Trans Eng Manag2021; 68: 1232–1244.
74.
LiuPZhouWFengL, et al. Mapping and comparing the technology evolution paths of scientific papers and patents: an integrated approach for forecasting technology trends. Scientometrics2024; 129: 1975–2005.
75.
JaiswalSEbertBL.Clonal hematopoiesis in human aging and disease. Science2019; 366: eaan4673.
76.
BrivioELocatelliFLopez-YurdaM, et al. A phase 1 study of inotuzumab ozogamicin in pediatric relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ITCC-059 study). Blood J Am Soc Hematol2021; 137: 1582–1590.
77.
OverbeekeCTakTKoendermanL.The journey of neutropoiesis: how complex landscapes in bone marrow guide continuous neutrophil lineage determination. Blood J Am Soc Hematol2022; 139: 2285–2293.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
