Abstract
This study analysed the use and perception of Sci-Hub, a representative Black Open Access website, to understand the behaviours of Korean researchers facing limited access to the information required for research activities. Debates on the role and future of Sci-Hub vary widely, raising questions of illegality and morality. While many studies have examined Sci-Hub, few focused on users and their motivations. This study employed a mixed-methods approach, conducting quantitative and qualitative research on Korean researchers to address this gap. The findings reveal that Sci-Hub’s copyright infringement has not discouraged its use. Researchers who prioritise quick access to information over copyright concerns deemed the unsegmented subscription environment and cumbersome, time-consuming library services inadequate, thus justifying Sci-Hub’s use. Researchers are expected to continue utilising Sci-Hub, notwithstanding concerns about illegality, morality and ethics. This study underscores the challenges researchers encounter in obtaining academic information, and advocates for more efficient access options.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
