Examination of digital citizenship,online information searching strategy and information literacy depending on changing state of experience in using digital technologies during COVID-19 pandemic

Abstract

As educational processes are adapted to the online environment due to COVID-19 pandemic, digital citizenship and online information searching strategies came into prominence. In this context, the aim of this study is the examination of digital citizenship awareness, online information searching strategies and differentiation of the level of information literacy depending on changing state of experience in using digital technologies before and during COVID-19 pandemic. Also, it is aimed to examine the presence of relations between variables of the research. The study was conducted with the participation of 255 university students. Analyses were performed using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM). According to the results of the study, during COVID-19 pandemic, there was an increase in digital citizenship awareness of students who spend more time in social media and the ones who improved digital technology usage skills developed online information searching strategies. According to the model analysed, online information searching strategies and information literacy have an effect on digital citizenship while online information searching strategies have an effect on information literacy. The results of the study showed that the students with higher level of information literacy and online information searching strategies may help them develop digital citizenship awareness.

Keywords

Daily social media usage duration digital citizenship digital technology usage skills information literacy online information searching strategy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Coklar

Tatli

. Evaluation of digital citizenship levels of teachers in the context of information literacy and internet and computer use self-efficacy. Asian J Contemp Educ 2020; 4(2): 80–90.

Crockett

. Librarians lead the growth of information literacy and global digital citizens. Knowl Quest 2018; 46(4): 28–33.

Julien

Barker

. How high-school students find and evaluate scientific information: a basis for information literacy skills development. Lib Inform Sci Res 2009; 31(1): 12–17.

Netwong

. The using of e-learning to develop digital citizenship and learning achievement in information technology. Int J e-Education, e-Business, e-Management e-Learning 2013; 3(2): 135.

Atoy

Jr Garcia

FRO

Cadungog

et al. Linking digital literacy and online information searching strategies of Philippine university students: the moderating role of mindfulness. J Librarianship Inform Sci 2020; 52(4): 1015–1027.

Tsai

Liang

Hou

et al. University students’ online information searching strategies in different search contexts. Australasian J Educ Technol 2012; 28(5): 822.

Henry

. Information search strategies on the Internet: a critical component of new literacies. Webology 2005; 2(1): 9.

Leu

Forzani

Rhoads

et al. The new literacies of online research and comprehension: rethinking the reading achievement gap. Read Res Quarter 2015; 50(1): 37–59.

Vrana

. Digital literacy as a prerequisite for achieving good academic performance. In: S

Kurbanoğlu

Špiranec

Grassian

et al. (eds) European conference on information literacy. Cham: Springer, 2014, pp. 160–169.

10.

Tapingkae

Panjaburee

Hwang

et al. Effects of a formative assessment-based contextual gaming approach on students’ digital citizenship behaviours, learning motivations, and perceptions. Comput Educ 2020; 159: 103998.

11.

Hobbs

. Digital and media literacy: a plan of action. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute, 2010.

12.

Yang

MacLeod

et al. Social media competence and digital citizenship among college students. Convergence 2019; 25(4): 735–752.

13.

Gleason

von Gillern

. Digital citizenship with social media: participatory practices of teaching and learning in secondary education. Educ Technol Soc 2018; 21(1): 200–212.

14.

Hays

Damron

. Open information literacy courses. Prac Acad Librarianship 2014; 4(1): i–xi.

15.

Karaseva

. Pedagogy of connection: teachers’ experiences of promoting students’ digital literacy. In: O

Erstad

Kumpulainen

Mäkitalo

et al. (eds) Learning across contexts in the knowledge society. Rotterdam: Brill Sense, 2016, pp. 225–240.

16.

Jenson

Droumeva

. Revisiting the media generation: youth media use and computational literacy instruction. E-Learn Dig Media 2017; 14(4): 212–225.

17.

Park

. Dimensions of digital media literacy and the relationship to social exclusion. Media Int Australia 2012; 142(1): 87–100.

18.

Reyna

Hanham

Meier

. The Internet explosion, digital media principles and implications to communicate effectively in the digital space. E-Learn Dig Media 2018; 15(1): 36–52.

19.

Hill

. Digital citizenship through game design in Minecraft. New Lib World 2015; 116(7–8): 369–382.

20.

Kara

. Understanding university students’ thoughts and practices about digital citizenship: a mixed methods study. Educat Technol Soc 2018; 21(1): 172–185.

21.

Salehan

Negahban

. Social networking on smartphones: when mobile phones become addictive. Comput Human Behav 2013; 29(6): 2632–2639.

22.

Watts

Wagner

Velasquez

et al. Cyberbullying in higher education: a literature review. Comput Human Behav 2017; 69: 268–274.

23.

Kim

Choi

. Development of youth digital citizenship scale and implication for educational setting. Educat Technol Soc 2018; 21(1): 155–171.

24.

Ribble

Bailey

Ross

. Digital citizenship: addressing appropriate technology behavior. Learn Lead Technol 2004; 32: 6–11.

25.

Ribble

. Passport to digital citizenship. Learn Lead Technol 2008; 36(4): 14–17.

26.

Jones

Mitchell

. Defining and measuring youth digital citizenship. New Media Soc 2016; 18(9): 2063–2079.

27.

Choi

Glassman

Cristol

. What it means to be a citizen in the internet age: development of a reliable and valid digital citizenship scale. Comput Educ 2017; 107: 100112.

28.

European Union. Framework of digital competences for citizenship, https://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=15688&langId=en#:~:text=The%20EU%20has%20developed%20the, their%20knowledge%2C%20skills%20and%20attitudes (2016, accessed 29 April 2022).

29.

Tsai

. Online Information Searching Strategy Inventory (OISSI): a quick version and a complete version. Comput Educ 2009; 53(2): 473–483.

30.

Debowski

. Wrong way: go back! An exploration of novice search behaviours while conducting an information search. Electron Lib 2001; 19: 371–382.

31.

Tsai

. Information searching strategies in web-based science learning: the role of Internet self-efficacy. Innovat Educ Teach Int 2003; 40(1): 43–50.

32.

Tsai

. Information commitments: evaluative standards and information searching strategies in web-based learning environments. J Comput Assist Learn 2005; 21(5): 374–385.

33.

Probert

. Information literacy skills: teacher understandings and practice. Comput Educat 2009; 53(1): 24–33.

34.

Choi

Cristol

Gimbert

. Teachers as digital citizens: the influence of individual backgrounds, internet use and psychological characteristics on teachers’ levels of digital citizenship. Comput Educ 2018; 121: 143–161.

35.

Krutka

Carpenter

. Digital citizenship in the curriculum. Educ Leader 2017; 75(3): 50–55.

36.

Choi

. A concept analysis of digital citizenship for democratic citizenship education in the internet age. Theory Res Soc Educ 2016; 44(4): 565–607.

37.

Mossberger

. Toward digital citizenship: addressing inequality in the information age. In: A

Chadwick

Howard

(eds) Routledge handbook of internet politics. London: Routledge, 2008, pp. 189–201.

38.

Çebi

Özdemir

. The role of digital nativity and digital citizenship in predicting high school students’ online information searching strategies. Educ Sci 2019; 44(200): 47–57.

39.

Çoklar

Dulkadir Yaman

Kabakçı Yurdakul

. Information literacy and digital nativity as determinants of online information search strategies. Comput Human Behav 2017; 70: 1–9.

40.

Ergün

Avcı

. Knowledge sharing self-efficacy motivation and sense of community as predictors of knowledge receiving and giving behaviors. J Educ Technol Soc 2018; 21(3): 60–73.

41.

Yildiz Durak

Saritepeci

. Modeling the effect of new media literacy levels and social media usage status on problematic internet usage behaviours among high school students. Educ Inform Technol 2019; 24(4): 2205–2223.

42.

Benson

Filippaios

. Collaborative competencies in professional social networking: are students short changed by curriculum in business education? Comput Human Behav 2015; 51: 1331–1339.

43.

Hallam

Zanella

. Online self-disclosure: the privacy paradox explained as a temporally discounted balance between concerns and rewards. Comput Human Behav 2017; 68: 217–227.

44.

Yildiz Durak

. Investigation of nomophobia and smartphone addiction predictors among adolescents in Turkey: demographic variables and academic performance. Soc Sci J 2019; 56(4): 492–517.

45.

Turkish Statistical Institute. Household information technologies (IT) usage survey, https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Survey-on-Information-and-Communication-Technology-(ICT)-Usage-in-Households-and-by-Individuals-2021-37437#:~:text=T%C3%9C%C4%B0K%20Kurumsal&text=Hanehalk%C4%B1%20bili%C5%9Fim%20teknolojileri%20kullan%C4%B1m%20ara%C5%9Ft%C4%B1rmas%C4%B1, y%C4%B1l%20%90%2C7%20idi (2021, accessed 3 January 2022).

46.

Pew Research Center. Social media fact sheet, http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/social-media (2017, accessed 3 January 2022).

47.

Avcı

Ergün

. Online students’ LMS activities and their effect on engagement, information literacy and academic performance. Interact Learn Environ 2019; 30: 71–84.

48.

Karasar

. Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. 14 Baskı. Ankara, Turkey: Nobel Yayınları, 2005.

49.

Erdem

Koçyiğit

. Exploring undergraduates’ digital citizenship levels: adaptation of the digital citizenship scale to Turkish. Malaysia Online J Educ Technol 2019; 7(3): 22–38.

50.

Aşkar

Mazman

. Çevrimiçi bilgi arama stratejileri envanteri’nin Türkçe’ye uyarlama çalışması. Eğitim Ve Bilim 2013; 38(168): 167–182.

51.

Adigüzel

. The development of the scale of information literacy. Dicle Univ J Ziya Gokalp Educ Facu 2011; 17: 15–28.

52.

Hair

Anderson

Tatham

et al. Multivariate data analysis. 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1995.

53.

Chin

. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research 1998; 295(2): 295–336.

54.

Falk

Miller

. A primer for soft modeling. Akron, OH: University of Akron Press, 1992.

55.

Ringle

Wende

Becker

. SmartPLS 3, SmartPLS GmbH, Boenningstedt, http://www.smartpls.com

56.

Nunnally

. Psychometric theory. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw Hill, 1978.

57.

Fornell

Larcker

. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Market Res 1981; 18: 39–50.

58.

Milenkova

Lendzhova

. Digital citizenship and digital literacy in the conditions of social crisis. Computers 2021; 10(4): 40.

59.

Ahlquist

. Trending now: digital leadership education using social media and the social change model. J Leader Stud 2014; 8(2): 57–60.

60.

Lauricella

Herdzina

Robb

. Early childhood educators’ teaching of digital citizenship competencies. Comput Educ 2020; 158: 103989.

61.

Bennett

Aguayo

Field

. At home in the world: supporting children in human rights, global citizenship, and digital citizenship. Childhood Educ 2016; 92(3): 189–199.

62.

Buchholz

DeHart

Moorman

. Digital citizenship during a global pandemic: moving beyond digital literacy. J Adoles Adult Liter 2020; 64(1): 11–17.

63.

Francke

Sundin

Limberg

. Debating credibility: the shaping of information literacies in upper secondary school. J Document 2011; 67(4): 675–694.

64.

Drouin

McDaniel

Pater

et al. How parents and their children used social media and technology at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic and associations with anxiety. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2020; 23(11): 727–736.