Insufficient examination of social factors obscures the reason why non-human information sources are under-utilised by social groups with lower information literacy. This study explores the mechanism of information source selection (ISS) of Chinese migrant farmer workers (MFWs) in different industries by conducting a cross-context analysis. After iterative analyses of multiple cases, a theoretical model of information source selection within an individual’s information world is constructed. It explains why MFWs make more use of social capitals than non-human information sources in information seeking. Besides, the information needs are examined form both the needed information and the need itself. A classification of social capital as human information source is created and the roles that social capitals and non-human information sources play in ISS are identified. This study provides novel theoretical insights into the ‘old’ issue of ISS, and thus has practical implications for public information service providers and MFW-related policy makers.
AguilarFJ.Scanning the business environment. New York: Macmillan, 1967, p. 5.
2.
LeckieGJPettigrewKESylyainC.Modeling the information seeking of professionals: a general model derived from research on engineers, health care professionals, and lawyers. Libr Quart1996; 66(2): 161–193.
3.
FidelRGreenM.The many faces of accessibility: engineers’ perception of information sources. Inform Process Manag2004; 40(3): 563–581.
4.
RobinsonMA.An empirical analysis of engineers’ information behaviors. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec2010; 61(4): 640–658.
5.
LinYColeCDalkirK.The relationship between perceived value and information source use during KM strategic decision-making: a study of 17 Chinese business managers. Inform Process Manag2014; 50(1): 156–174.
6.
HuvilaI.Information sources and perceived success in corporate finance. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec2010; 61(11): 2219–2229.
7.
ChowdhurySGibbFLandoniM.Uncertainty in information seeking and retrieval: a study in an academic environment. Inform Process Manag2011; 47(2): 157–175.
8.
CatalanoA.Patterns of graduate students’ information seeking behavior: a meta-synthesis of the literature. J Doc2013; 69(2): 293–294.
9.
KimKSSinSCJ. Selecting quality sources: bridging the gap between the perception and use of information sources. J Inf Sci2011; 37(2): 178–188.
10.
CallenJLBuyankhishigLBMcintoshJH.Clinical information sources used by hospital doctors in Mongolia. Int J Med Inform2008; 77(4): 249–255.
11.
BuckleyTStasaHCashinA, et al. Sources of information used to support quality use of medicines: findings from a national survey of nurse practitioners in Australia. Am Soc Inf Sci Technol2015; 27(2): 87–94.
12.
ZhangY.Beyond quality and accessibility: source selection in consumer health information searching. J Am Soc Inform Sci2014; 65(5): 911–927.
13.
SavolainenR.The role of emotions in online information seeking and sharing: a case study of consumer awareness. J Doc2015; 71(6): 1203–1227.
14.
MarrieRASalterARTyryT, et al. Preferred sources of health information in persons with multiple sclerosis: degree of trust and information sought. J Med Internet Res2013; 15(4): e67, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23635393/ (accessed 7 August 2021).
15.
CutilliCC.Seeking health information: what sources do your patients use. Orthop Nurs2010; 29(3): 214–219.
16.
LuLYuanYC.Shall I Google it or ask the competent villain down the hall? The moderating role of information need in information source selection. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec2011; 62(1): 133–145.
17.
LiuZYangZY.Factors influencing distance-education graduate students’ use of information sources: a user study. J Acad Libr2004; 30(1): 24–35.
18.
SpinkAColeC.Information and poverty: information-seeking channels used by African American low-income households. Libr Inform Sci Res2001; 23(1): 45–65.
19.
ChatmanEA.The impoverished life-world of outsiders. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec1996; 47(3): 193–206.
20.
TianM.Migrant workers’ job changing and the influence of changing ways on their salary. Shandong Soc Sci2016; 4: 39–46.
21.
HuH.Migrant children education of migrant workers in the process of urbanization. Chongqing Soc Sci2015; 12: 62–66.
22.
WangXSongLZhuH.Research on Chinese migrant workers vocational training system: take example by Germany dual training system. J Northwest Univ (Philos Soc Sci Ed)2015; 5: 144–149.
23.
ZhaoHChangJJinY.Health security of migrant workers in the context of healthy China. Chin Rural Health Serv Adm2021; 4: 242–245.
24.
MaoXLiuJ.Wage trends of Chinese migrant workers: concept clarification and data identification. Soc Sci Beijing2016; 1: 113–120.
25.
PanZLinT.Working time, social integrations and rural migrant workers’ social inclusion: based on ‘three integration’ of migrant workers’ survey in Hunan province. Chin J Popul Sci2015; 5: 108–115.
26.
LiH.From embedding and drifting to integration: on the process of migrant workers urban integration. Zhejiang Soc Sci2021; 6: 95–102, 159.
27.
WangKLiuL.Intergroup contact, interpersonal trust and social distance: a study of the intergroup relations between the urban residents and the migrant workers. J Yunnan Univ (Soc Sci Ed)2015; 4: 87–96.
28.
ZhangRTianX.The transformation of Chinese policies on migrant workers and its characteristics in the process of deepening urban reform. Chin Public Adm2016; 1: 99–104.
29.
HuttunenAKortelainenT.Meaning-making on gender: deeply meaningful information in a significant life change among transgender people. J Assoc Inf Sci Tech2021; 72: 799–810.
30.
WangFGuL. The critical success factors for the websites for Chinese migrant farmer workers: a multi-case study. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic of Electronic Governance (ICEGOV), Albany, NY, 22–25 October 2012, pp. 95–104. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
31.
WangFSongP.Operation mechanism of websites for Chinese migrant farmer workers. Chin Soft Sci2015; 4: 37–47.
32.
WangFChenY.From potential users to actual users: use of e-Government service by Chinese migrant farmer workers. Gov Inform Q2012; 29(Suppl. 1): 98–111.
33.
ChatmanEA.Life in a small world: applicability of gratification theory to information-seeking behavior. J Am Soc Inform Sci1991; 42(6): 438–449.
34.
LiYLinGChenN.Influencing factors and segmentation of migrant workers’ sexual health information seeking behavior: based on situational theory of publics. J Hunan Agric Univ (Soc Sci)2016; 1: 54–60.
35.
WangXShenS.Study on influencing factors of peasant workers’ health information acquisition. Libr Inf Serv2020; 64(8): 103–110.
36.
ChengHLiuJ.Analysis of the present situation and cultivation path of new generation migrant workers’ information literacy. Inf Sci2015; 2: 105–108, 120.
37.
LiQCaiH.Information fusion: the city inclusion of the new generation migrant rural workers. Libr Dev2012; 12: 1724–1719.
38.
TaljaS.Constituting ‘information’ and ‘use’ as research objects. In: VakkariPSavolainenRDervinB (eds) Information seeking in context. London: Taylor Graham, 1992, pp. 67–80.
39.
BelkinNJ.Anomalous states of knowledge as a basis for information retrieval. Can J Inform Sci1980; 5: 133–143.
40.
DervinBNilanM.Information needs and uses. Annu Rev Inform Sci1986; 21: 3–33.
41.
KuhlthauCC.Seeking meaning: a process approach to library and information science. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1993, p. 5.
42.
WilsonTD.Models in information behaviour research. J Doc1999; 55(3): 249–270.
43.
SavolainenR.Expectancy-value beliefs and information needs as motivators for task-based information seeking. J Doc2012; 68(4): 492–511.
44.
LuegC. On problem solving and information seeking. In: Proceedings of information seeking in context: the fourth international conference on information needs, seeking and use in different contexts, Lisbon, 11–13 September 2002.
45.
AllenBL.Information needs. In: AllenB (ed.) Information task: toward a user centered approach to information system. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press, 1996, p. 103.
46.
ThaniAHashimL.Information needs and information seeking behaviors of social science graduate students in Malaysian public universities. Int J Bus Soc Sci2011; 2(4): 137–143.
47.
SobalajeAJOgunmodedeTAOyetolaSO, et al. Information needs, information sources and information seeking behaviour of agricultural extension workers in Osogbo zone of Osun State, Nigeria. Libr Philos Pract, 3031, https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/3031 (2019, accessed 20 July 2021).
48.
WilsonTD.On user studies and information needs. J Doc1981; 37(1): 3–15.
49.
AllenB.Information needs: a person-in-situation approach. In: Information seeking in context: proceedings of an international conference on research in information needs, seeking and use in different contexts (ed P, Savolainen R and Dervin BVakkari), Tampere, 14–16 August 1996, pp. 111–122. London: Taylor Graham.
50.
WestbrookL.E-government support for people in crisis: an evaluation of police department website support for domestic violence survivors using person-in-situation information need analysis. Libr Inform Sci Res2008; 30(1): 22–38.
51.
AgostoDEHughes-HassellS.Toward a model of the everyday life information needs of urban teenagers. Part 1: theoretical model. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec2006; 57(10): 1394–1403.
52.
AgostoDEHughes-HassellS.Toward a model of the everyday life information needs of urban teenagers. Part 2: empirical model. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec2006; 57(11): 1418–1426.
53.
MirandaSVTarapanoffKMA. Information needs and information competencies: a case study of the off-site supervision of financial institutions in Brazil. Inform Res2008; 13(2): 1–24.
54.
ShohamSStraussSK.Information needs of North American immigrants to Israel. J Inf Commun Ethics Soc2007; 5(2–3): 185–205.
55.
LineMB.The information uses and needs of social scientists: an overview of INFROSS. Aslib Proc1971; 23(8): 412–434.
56.
NovakLLSimpsonCLCocoJ, et al. Understanding the information needs and context of trauma handoffs to design automated sensing clinical documentation technologies: qualitative mixed-method study of military and civilian cases. J Med Internet Res2020; 22(9): e17978, https://www.jmir.org/2020/9/e17978/authors (accessed 7 August 2021).
57.
ByströmKJärvelinK.Task complexity affects information seeking and use. Inf Process Manag1995; 31(2): 191–213.
58.
ByströmK.Information and information sources in tasks of varying complexity. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec2002; 53(7): 581–591.
59.
YusufTI.Information needs, sources and information seeking behaviour of women artisans in Offa Metropolis. Libr Philos Pract, 1201, http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1201 (2012, accessed 2January2021).
60.
WangF. Personal influence on citizens’ utilization of government information: an empirical study. In: AMCIS 2009 Proceedings, San Francisco, CA, 6–9August2009, paper no. 563, https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2009/563 (accessed 6 July 2021).
61.
JonesMJainPBuchananG, et al. From sit-forward to lean-back: using a mobile device to vary interactive pace. Working paper no. 03/03, March2003. Hamilton, New Zealand: University of Waikato, Department of Computer Science.
62.
AgarwalNKXuYPooDCC. A context-based investigation into source use by information seekers. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec2011; 62(6): 1087–1104.
63.
BuchananSJardineC.The complex information needs of disadvantaged young first-time mothers: insights into multiplicity of needs. J Doc2020; 76(6): 1135–1153.
64.
XuYTanCYYangL.Who will you ask? An empirical study of interpersonal task information seeking. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec2006; 57(12): 1666–1677.
65.
VyasVVyasSKundanA.Management information system: information needs of organization. Int J Inf Comput Technol2014; 4(17): 1903–1908.
66.
KuhlthauCC.The role of experience in the information search process of an early career information worker: perceptions of uncertainty, complexity, construction, and source. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec1999; 50(5): 399–412.
67.
ChooCW.Perception and use of information sources by chief executives in environmental scanning. Libr Inform Sci Res1994; 16(1): 23–40.
68.
ChristensenEWBaileyJR.A source accessibility effect on media selection. Manage Commun Q1997; 10(3): 373–387.
69.
RulkeDLZaheerSAndersonMH.Sources of managers’ knowledge of organizational capabilities. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process2000; 82(1): 134–149.
70.
JulienHMichelsD.Source selection among information seekers: ideals and realities. Can J Libr Inf Sci2000; 25(4): 1–18.
71.
LiuJYanHWangY.Bonding social capital in employment information seeking behaviors of new generation of migrant workers: a field study of Dongzhi County, Anhui Province. Doc Inf Knowl2013; 6: 23–41.
JohnsonCA.Social capital and the search for information: examining the role of social capital in information seeking behavior in Mongolia. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec2007; 58(6): 883–894.
74.
SavolainenR.Everyday life information seeking. In: DrakeMA (ed.) Encyclopedia of library and information science. 3rd ed.New York: Taylor & Francis, 2010, pp. 1780–1789.
75.
SonnenwaldDH.Evolving perspectives of human information behavior: contexts, situations, social networks and information horizons. In: WilsonTAllenD (eds) Exploring the contexts of information behaviour. London: Taylor Graham, 1999, pp. 176–190.
76.
SavolainenRKariJ.Placing the internet in information source horizons: a study of information seeking by Internet users in the context of self-development. Libr Inform Sci Res2004; 26: 415–433.
77.
O’ReillyCA.Variations in decision makers’ use of information sources: the impact of quality and accessibility of information. Acad Manag J1982; 25(4): 756–771.
78.
WoudstraLvan den HooffB.Inside the source selection process: selection criteria for human information sources. Inform Process Manag2008; 44(3): 1267–1278.
79.
WoudstraLvan den HooffBSchoutenAP.Dimensions of quality and accessibility: selection of human sources from a social capital perspective. Inform Process Manag2012; 48(4): 618–630.
80.
WoudstraLvan den HooffBSchoutenAP.The quality versus accessibility debate revisited: a contingency perspective on human information source selection. J Assoc Inf Sci Tech2016; 67(9): 2060–2071.
81.
RiehSY.Judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the Web. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec2002; 53(2): 145–161.
82.
RobsonARobinsonL.Building on models of information behaviour: linking information seeking and communication. J Doc2013; 69(2): 169–193.
83.
MaseASBabinNLProkopyLS, et al. Trust in sources of soil and water quality information: implications for environmental outreach and education. J Am Water Resour As2015; 51(6): 1656–1666.
84.
WangF.Explaining the low utilization of government websites: using a grounded theory approach. Gov Inform Q2014; 31(4): 610–621.
85.
ZimmerJCHenryRM.The role of social capital in selecting interpersonal information sources. J Assoc Inf Sci Tech2017; 68(1): 5–21.
86.
EscofferyCMinerKRAdameDD, et al. Internet use for health information among college students. J Am Coll Health2005; 53(4): 183–188.
87.
SavolainenR.Source preferences in the context of seeking problem-specific information. Inf Process Manag2008; 44(1): 274–293.
88.
YuL. Information worlds of Chinese farmers and their implications for agricultural information services: a fresh look at ways to deliver effective services. In: World Library and Information Congress: 76th IFLA General Conference and Assembly, Gothenburg, 10–15 August 2010.
89.
HertzumM.The importance of trust in software engineers’ assessment and choice of information sources. Inf Organ2002; 12(1): 1–18.
90.
ZimmerJCHenryRMButlerBS.Determinants of the use of relational and non-relational information sources. J Manage Inform Syst2008; 24(3): 297–331.
91.
WangFZhangXZhaiY.A review on information source selection and an integrated conceptual model. J Libr Sci China2017; 2: 96–116.
92.
SigaardKTSkovM.Applying an expectancy-value model to study motivators for work-task based information seeking. J Doc2015; 71(4): 709–732.
93.
SavolainenR.Information source horizons and source preferences of environmental activists: a social phenomenological approach. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec2007; 58(12): 1709–1719.
94.
RosenblumSIsettKRMelkersJ, et al. The association between professional stratification and use of online sources: evidence from the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. J Inf Sci2019; 47(3): 373–386.
95.
BurtRS.Structural holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992, p. 10.
96.
ColemanJS.Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am J Sociol1988; 94(Suppl. 1): 95–120.
97.
WoolcockMNarayanD.Social capital: implications for development theory, research, and policy. World Bank Res Obser2000; 15(2): 225–249.
98.
PutnamRD.Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000, p. 25.
99.
LinNCookKSBurtRS (eds). Social capital: theory and research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 2001, p. 39.
100.
GranovetterMS.The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol1973; 78(6): 1360–1380.
101.
CofféHGeysB.Toward an empirical characterization of bridging and bonding social capital. Nonprof Volunt Sec Q2006; 36(1): 121–139.
102.
MatejuPVitáskováA.Interpersonal trust and mutually beneficial exchanges: measuring social capital for comparative analyses. Czech Sociol Rev2006; 42(3): 493–516.
103.
YueZLiSRenY, et al. Social network and social integration of migrant workers. Chin J Sociol2011; 6: 130–152.
104.
RobinsonL.Information-channel preferences and information-opportunity structures. Inf Commun Soc2011; 4: 472–494.
105.
MirzaeiTEsmaeilzadehP.Engagement in online health communities: channel expansion and social exchanges. Inform Manage2021; 58(1): 103404.
106.
BoxmanEAWDe GraafEMFlapHD.The impact of social and human capital on the income attainment of Dutch managers. Soc Networks1991; 13(1): 51–73.
107.
LinNWalterMEJohnCV.Social resources and strength of ties: structural factors in occupational status attainment. Am Sociol Rev1981; 46(4): 393–405.
108.
LiP.The social network and social status of migrant workers. Sociol Res1996; 4: 42–52.
109.
LiHLiQ.Reproduction of farmer workers’ relation network of job hunting: a case study on decorators in Lanzhou city. J Northwest Norm Univ (Soc Sci)2008; 6: 100–106.
110.
CourtrightC. Context in information behavior research. Annu Rev Inform Sci2007; 41: 273–306.
111.
NebusJ.Building collegial information networks: a theory of advice network generation. Acad Manage Rev2006; 31(3): 615–637.
112.
AdlerPSKwonSW.Social capital: prospects for a new concept. Acad Manage Rev2002; 27(1): 17–40.
113.
FardousJDuJTHansenP, et al. Group trip planning and information seeking behaviours by mobile social media users: a study of tourists in Australia, Bangladesh and China. J Inf Sci2019; 47(3): 323–339.
114.
TöttermanAKWidén-WulffG.What a social capital perspective can bring into the understanding of information sharing in a university context. Inform Res2007; 12(4), http://informationr.net/ir/12-4/colis/colis19.html (accessed 20 July 2021).
115.
AudunsonRAVårheimADokk-HolmE, et al. Public libraries, social capital and low intensive meeting places. Inform Res2007; 12(4), http://informationr.net/ir/12-4/colis/colis20.html (accessed 15 May 2021).
116.
O’ConnorCC.Market learning and radical innovation: a cross case comparison of Eight Radical innovation projects. J Prod Innovat Manag1998; 15(2): 151–166.
117.
EisenhardtKM.Building theories from case study research. Acad Manage Rev1989; 14(4): 532–550.
118.
YinR.Case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 1994, p. 89.
XuYChenZ.Relevance judgment: what do information users consider beyond topicality?J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec2006; 57(7): 961–973.
121.
FosterA.Battening down the hatches: the business information survey. Bus Inf Rev2009; 26(1): 10–27.
122.
BakerLWagnerTHSingerS, et al. Use of the internet and e-mail for health care information: results from a national survey. J Am Med Assoc2003; 289(18): 2400–2406.
123.
KankanhalliATanBCYKwok-KeeW.Understanding seeking from electronic knowledge repositories: an empirical study. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec2005; 56(11): 1156–1166.
124.
LeeSKimBG.Factors affecting the usage of intranet: a confirmatory study. Comput Hum Behav2009; 25(1): 191–201.
125.
CaseDOJohnsonJDAndrewsJE, et al. From two-step flow to the Internet: the changing array of sources for genetics information seeking. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec2004; 55(8): 660–669.
126.
KafaiYBatesMJ.Internet web-searching instruction in the elementary classroom: building a foundation for information literacy. Sch Libr Media Q1997; 25(2): 103–111.
127.
EastinMSYangMSNathansonAI.Children of the net: an empirical exploration into the evaluation of Internet content. J Broadcast Electron2006; 50(2): 211–230.
128.
SubramaniamMTaylorNGSt. JeanB, et al. As simple as that? Tween credibility assessment in a complex online world. J Doc2015; 71(3): 550–571.
129.
YitzhakiMHammershlagG.Accessibility and use of information sources among computer scientists and software engineers in Israel: academy versus industry. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec2004; 55(9): 832–842.
130.
PereiraFCMBarbosaRR. The use of information sources by business consultants: a study on a consulting market in Belo Horizonte. Perspect Cienc Inf2008; 13(1): 95–111.
131.
ZhangXChenQWangF.Investigation and analysis of information services of Tianjin Public Library for migrant workers: based on social support theory. Libr Inform2017; 2: 76–83.
