Nowadays, cyber hate speech is increasingly growing, which forms a serious problem worldwide by threatening the cohesion of civil societies. Hate speech relates to using expressions or phrases that are violent, offensive or insulting for a person or a minority of people. In particular, in the Arab region, the number of Arab social media users is growing rapidly, which is accompanied with high increasing rate of cyber hate speech. This drew our attention to aspire healthy online environments that are free of hatred and discrimination. Therefore, this article aims to detect cyber hate speech based on Arabic context over Twitter platform, by applying Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques, and machine learning methods. The article considers a set of tweets related to racism, journalism, sports orientation, terrorism and Islam. Several types of features and emotions are extracted and arranged in 15 different combinations of data. The processed dataset is experimented using Support Vector Machine (SVM), Naive Bayes (NB), Decision Tree (DT) and Random Forest (RF), in which RF with the feature set of Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF) and profile-related features achieves the best results. Furthermore, a feature importance analysis is conducted based on RF classifier in order to quantify the predictive ability of features in regard to the hate class.
Abu-TaiehEAlfariesAAl-OtaibiS, et al.Cyber security crime and punishment: comparative study of the laws of Jordan, Kuwait, Qatar, Oman, and Saudi Arabia. Int J Cyb War Terr2018; 8(3): 46–59.
BadaroGBalyRHajjH, et al.A survey of opinion mining in Arabic: a comprehensive system perspective covering challenges and advances in tools, resources, models, applications, and visualizations. ACM Trans Asian Low Res Lang Inf Process2019; 18(3): 27.
10.
BiltawiMEtaiwiWTedmoriS, et al.Sentiment classification techniques for Arabic language: a survey. In: 2016 7th International Conference on Information and Communication Systems (ICICS), Irbid, Jordan, 5–7 April 2016, pp. 339–346. New York: IEEE.
11.
ElouardighiAMaghfourMHammiaH, et al.A machine learning approach for sentiment analysis in the standard or dialectal Arabic Facebook comments. In: 2017 3rd International Conference of Cloud Computing Technologies and Applications (CloudTech), Rabat, Morocco, 24–26 October 2017, pp. 1–8. New York: IEEE.
12.
BiltawiMAl-NaymatGTedmoriS. Arabic sentiment classification: a hybrid approach. In: 2017 International Conference on New Trends in Computing Sciences (ICTCS), Amman, Jordan, 11–13 October 2017, pp. 104–108. New York: IEEE.
13.
MassALDalyREPhamPT, et al.Learning word vectors for sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Portland, OR, 19–24 June 2011, pp. 142–150. Philadelphia, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
14.
DaoudASSallamAWheedME. Improving Arabic document clustering using K-means algorithm and particle swarm optimization. In: 2017 Intelligent Systems Conference (IntelliSys), London, 7–8 September 2017, pp. 879–885. New York: IEEE.
15.
Al-AyyoubMNuseirAAlsmearatK, et al.Deep learning for Arabic NLP: a survey. J Comput Sci2018; 26: 522–531.
16.
Al-AzaniSEl-AlfyE-SM. Combining emojis with Arabic textual features for sentiment classification. In: 2018 9th International Conference on Information and Communication Systems (ICICS), Irbid, Jordan, 3–5 April 2018, pp. 139–144. New York: IEEE.
17.
TubishatMAbushariahMAMIdrisN, et al.Improved whale optimization algorithm for feature selection in Arabic sentiment analysis. Appl Intell2019; 49(5): 1688–1707.
18.
ChaturvediICambriaEWelschRE, et al.Distinguishing between facts and opinions for sentiment analysis: survey and challenges. Inform Fusion2018; 44: 65–77.
19.
LópezMValdiviaAMartnez-CámaraE, et al.E2SAM: evolutionary ensemble of sentiment analysis methods for domain adaptation. Inf Sci2019; 480: 273–286.
20.
TsakalidisAPapadopoulosSVoskakiR, et al.Building and evaluating resources for sentiment analysis in the Greek language. Lang Res Eval2018; 52(4): 1021–1044.
21.
VizcarraGMauricioAMauricioL. A deep learning approach for sentiment analysis in Spanish tweets. In: International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, Rhodes, 4–7 October 2018, pp. 622–629. Cham: Springer.
22.
Al-HassanAAl-DossariH. Detection of hate speech in social networks: a survey on multilingual corpus. Comp Sci Inf Tech2019; 9(2): 83.
23.
ChettyNAlathurS. Hate speech review in the context of online social networks. Aggress Viol Behav2018; 40: 108–118
24.
WatanabeHBouaziziMOhtsukiT. Hate speech on Twitter: a pragmatic approach to collect hateful and offensive expressions and perform hate speech detection. IEEE Access2018; 6: 13825–13835.
25.
RobinsonDZhangZTepperJ. Hate speech detection on Twitter: feature engineering vs feature selection. In: European Semantic Web Conference, Heraklion, 3–7 June 2018, pp. 46–49. Basel: Springer.
26.
PitsilisGKRamampiaroHLangsethH. Effective hate-speech detection in Twitter data using recurrent neural networks. Appl Intell2018; 48(12): 4730–4742.
27.
ZhangZRobinsonDTepperJ. Detecting hate speech on Twitter using a convolution-GRU based deep neural network. In: European Semantic Web Conference, Heraklion, 3–7 June 2018, pp. 745–760. Basel: Springer.
28.
BiereSBhulaiS. Hate speech detection using natural language processing techniques. PhD thesis, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 2018.
29.
WaseemZThorneJBingelJ. Bridging the gaps: multi task learning for domain transfer of hate speech detection. In: GolbeckJ (ed.) Online harassment. Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, 2018, pp. 29–55.
30.
KshirsagarRCukuvacTMcKeownK, et al.Predictive embeddings for hate speech detection on Twitter. arXiv preprint: arXiv:1809.10644, 2018.
31.
UnsvågEFGambäckB. The effects of user features on twitter hate speech detection. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Abusive Language Online (ALW2), Brussels, 31 October 2018, pp. 75–85. Association for Computational Linguistics.
32.
AlfinaIMuliaRFananyMI, et al.Hate speech detection in the Indonesian language: a dataset and preliminary study. In: 2017 International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems (ICACSIS), Bali, Indonesia, 28–29 October 2017, pp. 233–238. New York: IEEE.
33.
ZhangZLuoL. Hate speech detection: a solved problem? The challenging case of long tail on Twitter. arXiv preprint: arXiv:1803.03662, 2018.
34.
Del VignaFCiminoADell’OrlettaF, et al.Hate me, hate me not: hate speech detection on Facebook. In: Proceedings of the First Italian Conference on Cybersecurity (ITASEC17), Venice, 17–20 January 2017.
35.
KotuVDeshpandeB. Data science: concepts and practice. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann, 2018.
36.
SuykensJAKVandewalleJ. Least squares support vector machine classifiers. Neur Process Lett1999; 9(3): 293–300.
37.
HanJPeiJKamberM. Data mining: concepts and techniques. Waltham, MA: Elsevier, 2011.
38.
DomingosPPazzaniM. On the optimality of the simple Bayesian classifier under zero-one loss. Mach Learn1997; 29(2–3): 103–130.
39.
QuinlanJR. Induction of decision trees. Mach Learn1986; 1(1): 81–106.
40.
BreimanL. Random forests. Mach Learn2001; 45(1): 5–32.
41.
VerzaniJ. Getting started with RStudio. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media, Inc., 2011.
42.
LoperEBirdS. NLTK: the natural language toolkit. In: Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Effective Tools and Methodologies for Teaching Natural Language Processing and Computational Linguistics, Barcelona, Spain, 2004, pp. 214–217. Philadelphia, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
43.
Van RossumGDrakeFLJr. Python tutorial. Amsterdam: Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica, 1995.
44.
PedregosaFVaroquauxGGramfortA, et al.Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J Mach Learn Res2011; 12: 2825–2830.
