While there have been numerous studies of music-search behaviour, little is known about gendered aspects of how it is carried out on social question and answer sites. The article examines gender differences manifested on one such site with regard to (a) the motivations of the person posing the question, (b) intervening variables that influence music-search behaviour and (c) the formulation of the questions. Results from manual categorisation and other analysis of 17,380 music-relevant questions collected from the site show that males who asked questions did so more often, provided more answers and had more followers than female question-posters. Males tended to include music context information in questions asking for ready reference, whereas females often asked questions in a second-person pronoun aiming for promoting discussion. Such research results add to the current understanding of music-search behaviour and contribute new insights that can inform development of better music services/systems.
ChoiEShahC. User motivations for asking questions in online Q&A services. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol2016; 67: 1182–1197.
4.
KimS. Questioners’ credibility judgments of answers in a social question and answer site. Inform Res2010; 15: 1368–1613.
5.
LeeJHDownieJSCunninghamSJ. Challenges in cross-cultural/multilingual music information seeking. In: Proceedings of ISMIR 2005 - 6th international conference on music information retrieval, London, 11–15 September 2005, pp. 1–7. London: Queen Mary University of London.
6.
HertzumMBorlundP. Music questions in social Q&A: an analysis of Yahoo! Answers. J Document2017; 73: 992–1009.
7.
DeauxK. From individual differences to social categories: analysis of a decade’s research on gender. Am Psychol1984; 39: 105–116.
8.
VenkateshVMorrisMG. Why don’t men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quart2000; 24: 115–139.
9.
ArcherJ. Sex differences in social behavior: are the social role and evolutionary explanations compatible?Am Psychol1996; 51: 909–917.
10.
RowleyJJohnsonFSbaffiL. Gender as an influencer of online health information-seeking and evaluation behavior. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol2017; 68: 36–47.
11.
LimSKwonN. Gender differences in information behavior concerning Wikipedia, an unorthodox information source?Libr Inf Sci Res2010; 32: 212–220.
12.
ShahC. Measuring effectiveness and user satisfaction in Yahoo! Answers. First Monday2011; 16: 3092.
13.
LeeJH. Analysis of user needs and information features in natural language queries seeking music information. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol2010; 61: 1025–1045.
14.
NamKKAckermanMSAdamicLA. Questions in, knowledge in? A study of naver’s question answering community. In: Proceedings of the 27th international conference on human factors in computing systems, Boston, MA, 3–9 April 2009, pp. 779–788. New York: ACM.
KostagiolasPALavranosCKorfiatisN, et al. Music, musicians and information seeking behaviour. J Document2015; 71: 3–24.
17.
LaplanteADownieJS. Everyday life music information-seeking behaviour of young adults. In: Proceedings of ISMIR 2006 - 7th international conference on music information retrieval, Victoria, BC, Canada, 8–12 October 2006, pp. 381–382. Victoria: ISMIR.
18.
BaharuddinKKassimNAIshakNH, et al. Music information needs and methods of getting information among music students in a public institution of higher education. Int J Acad Res Bus Soc Sci2016; 6: 44–51.
19.
LeeJHChoHKimYS. Users’ music information needs and behaviors: design implications for music information retrieval systems. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol2016; 67: 1301–1330.
20.
FuHFanY. Music information seeking via social Q&A: an analysis of questions in Music StackExchange community. In: Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE/ACM joint conference on digital libraries (JCDL), Newark, NJ, 19–23 June 2016, pp. 139–142. New York: IEEE.
HuXLeeJHWongLKY. Music information behaviors and system preferences of university students in Hong Kong. In: Proceedings of the 15th international society for music information retrieval conference, 2014, pp. 579–584, http://www.terasoft.com.tw/conf/ismir2014/proceedings/T104_346_Paper.pdf
23.
FerwerdaBYangESchedlM, et al. Personality traits predict music taxonomy preferences. In: Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 18–23 April 2015.
24.
HuXKongHKandoN. Task complexity and difficulty in music information retrieval. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol2017; 68: 1711–1723.
25.
LeeJHWishkoskiRAaseL, et al. Understanding users of cloud music services: selection factors, management and access behavior, and perceptions. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol2017; 68: 1186–1200.
26.
LeeJHPriceR. User experience with commercial music services: an empirical exploration. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol2016; 67: 800–811.
27.
BainbridgeDCunninghamSJDownieJS. How people describe their music information needs: a grounded theory analysis of music queries. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on music information retrieval, 2003, pp. 221–222, https://jscholarship.library.jhu.edu/bitstream/handle/1774.2/32/paper.pdf
28.
HarperFMWeinbergJLogieJ, et al. Question types in social Q&A sites. First Monday2010; 15: 4.
29.
KucuktuncOCambazogluBBWeberI, et al. A large-scale sentiment analysis for Yahoo! answers. In: Proceedings of the WSDM ’12 – fifth ACM international conference on web search and data mining, Seattle, WA, 8–12 February 2012, p. 633. New York: ACM.
JengWDesAutelsSHeD, et al. Information exchange on an academic social networking site: a multidiscipline comparison on researchgate Q&A. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol2017; 68: 638–652.
33.
AlthoffTDanescu-Niculescu-MizilCJurafskyD. How to ask for a favor: a case study on the success of altruistic requests. Palo Alto, CA: Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, 2011, pp. 12–21.
34.
ZhuZBernhardDGurevychI. A multi-dimensional model for assessing the quality of answers in social Q&A sites. In: Proceedings of 14th international conference on information quality, 2009, vol. 1, pp. 264–265, http://tuprints.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/1940/1/TR_dimension_model.pdf
35.
BurrV. Gender and social psychology, 1998. London: Routledge.
36.
Perez-CarballoJBlaszczynskiC. Social media usage by business college students. Proc Acad Inf Manage Sci2011; 15: 5–8.
37.
SinghKKumarMKhanchandaniV. Information needs and information seeking behavior of foreign students in University of Delhi: a survey. Int J Knowl Cont Develop Technol2015; 5: 25–43.
38.
TongVRaynor, DavidK, et al. Gender differences in health and medicine information seeking behaviour: a review. J Malta Coll Pharm Pract2014; 1: 14–16.
39.
SteinerovaJSusolJ. Users’ information behaviour–a gender perspective. Inform Res2007; 12: 320.
40.
WeiserEB. Gender differences in internet use patterns and internet application preferences: a two-sample comparison. CyberPsychol Behav2000; 3: 167–178.
41.
LargeABeheshtiJRahmanT. Gender differences in collaborative web searching behavior: an elementary school study. Inf Process Manage2002; 38: 427–443.
42.
OtterbacherJ. Gender, writing and ranking in review forums: a case study of the IMDb. Knowl Inform Syst2013; 35: 645–664.
43.
VasilescuBCapiluppiASerebrenikA. Gender, representation and online participation: a quantitative study. Interact Comput2014; 26: 488–511.
44.
KimKSSinSCJTsaiTI. Individual differences in social media use for information seeking. J Acad Libr2014; 40: 171–178.
45.
LiHLaiVSLuoX. Understanding the role of social situations on continuance participation intention in online communities: an empirical perspective. J Electron Comm Res2016; 17: 358–380.
46.
WilsonTD. Models in information behaviour research. J Document1999; 55: 249–270.
47.
WilsonTD. On user studies and information needs. J Document1981; 37: 3–15.
48.
WilsonTD. Information behaviour: an interdisciplinary perspective. Inform Process Manage1997; 33: 551–572.
49.
YoonJChungE. Understanding image needs in daily life by analyzing questions in a social Q&A site. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol2011; 62: 2201–2213.
50.
WangWJiYQWangHW, et al. Evaluating Chinese answers’ quality in the community QA system: a case study of Zhihu. Libr Inform Serv2017; 61: 36–44.
WilsonTD. Revisiting user studies and information needs. J Document2006; 62: 680–684.
53.
SchedlMGómezEUrbanoJ. Music information retrieval: recent developments and applications. Found Trends Inform Retrieval2014; 8: 127–261.
54.
KneesPSchedlM. A survey of music similarity and recommendation from music context data. ACM Trans Multim Comput Commun Appl2013; 10: 1–21.
55.
BelkSSSnellWE. Beliefs about women: components and correlates. Personal Soc Psychol Bull1986; 12(12): 403–413.
56.
LazarJFengJHHochheiserH. Research methods in human-computer interaction, 2010. Chichester: John Wiley.
57.
RobinsonMDJohnsonJTShieldsSA. The gender heuristic and the database: factors affecting the perception of gender-related differences in the experience and display of emotions. Basic Appl Soc Psychol1998; 20: 206–219.
