This paper reports the findings of a study of the information practices of archaeologists, students and volunteers undertaking an excavation in the field. Conceptually, the study was guided by a social constructionist and practice-theoretical epistemological standpoint. Methodologically, the study employed a multi-faceted approach incorporating both ethnographic observation of archaeologists working in the field and in-depth interviews. The findings show that participants’ practices were both social and embodied in nature.
SavolainenR. Information behaviour and information practice: Reviewing the ‘umbrella concepts’ of information-seeking studies. Library Quarterly2007; 77(2):109–132.
2.
PryorF. Britain AD: A quest for Arthur, England and the Anglo-Saxons. London: HarperCollins2005.
3.
LundNW. Document theory. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology2009; 43(1): 1–55.
4.
BrietS. What is documentation? English translation of the classic French text. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow, 2006.
5.
HuvilaI. The politics of boundary objects: Hegemonic interventions and the making of a document. Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology2011; 62(120): 2528–2539.
6.
BergerPLLuckmannT. The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Allen Lane, 1967.
7.
GherardiS. Practice-based theorizing on learning and knowing in organizations. Organization2000; 7(2): 211–223.
8.
NicoliniD. Practice theory, work, organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
9.
GherardiS. Situated knowledge and situated action: What do practice-based studies promise? In: BarryDHansenH (eds) The Sage Handbook of New Approaches in Management and Organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2008, pp. 516–527.
10.
DervinBForeman-WernetL. Sense-making methodology reader: Selected writings of Brenda Dervin. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 2003.
11.
FoucaultM. Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977. London: Harvester Press, 1980.
12.
FaircloughN. Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge, 2003.
13.
DervinB. On studying information seeking and use methodologically: The implications of connecting metatheory to method. Information Processing and Management1999; 35: 727–750.
14.
OlssonM. The play’s the thing: Theater professionals make sense of Shakespeare. Library and Information Science Research2010; 32(4): 272–280.
15.
OlssonM. All the world’s a stage – The information practices and sense-making of theatre professionals. Libri2010; 60: 241–252.
16.
OlssonM. Gently to hear, kindly to judge: The affective information practices of theatre professionals and journalists. Information Research2013; 18(3): paper C22, http://InformationR.net/ir/18–3/colis/paperC22.html (accessed July 2015).
17.
CouplandJGwynR. Discourse, the body, and identity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.
18.
LloydA. Learning to put out the red stuff: Becoming information literate through discursive practice. Library Quarterly2007; 77(2): 181–198.
19.
LloydA. Framing information literacy as information practice: Site ontology and practice theory. Journal of Documentation2010; 66(2): 245–268.
20.
GeertzC. The interpretation of culture. New York: Basic Books, 1977.
21.
BrymanA. Social research methods, 4th edn.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
22.
SeidmanIE. Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York: Teachers College Press, 1991.
23.
MilesMBHubermanMA. Qualitative data analysis, 2nd edn.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994.
24.
KvaleS. Interviews. An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1996.
25.
PhillipsNHardyC. Discourse analysis. Investigating processes of social construction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2002.
26.
AlvessonMKärremanD. Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis. Human Relations2000; 53(9): 1125–1149.
27.
MacGregorG. Making sense of the past in the present: A sensory analysis of carved stone balls. World Archaeology1999; 31(2): 258–271.
YarrowT. In context: Meaning, materiality and agency in the process of archaeological recording. In: Material agency. Berlin: Springer, 2008, pp. 121–37.
