In order to develop suitable pedagogical methods for inquiry based learning we need an increased understanding of factors that influence students’ work in inquiry assignments. The aim of this study was to investigate how high school students’ ways to work in a collaborative source-based writing assignment was influenced by their individual approach to studying and the teacher’s instructions and guidance in the class. The respondents were 53 high school students who filled out a questionnaire regarding their work on the source based assignment and the OPPI test of their approaches to studying. A factor analysis revealed three work patterns: a collaborative, a labour intense and a subject oriented. The results showed that the collaborative pattern was related to instructional differences, while a subject oriented work pattern was typical for students with a deep approach regardless of instruction. Instructional differences and study approaches also influenced degree of challenges in the project and, to a certain extent, learning experiences. The findings show a complex interplay between personal preferences and instructional interventions in forming students’ paths through source based writing assignments.
KuhlthauCC.Seeking meaning: A process approach to library and information services, 2nd edn.Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited, 2004.
2.
KuhlthauCCManiotesLKCaspariAK.Guided inquiry: Learning in the 21st century. Westport CT: Libraries Unlimited, 2007.
3.
ScardamaliaMBereiterC.Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In: SawyerK (ed.) Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 97–118.
4.
AlexanderssonMLimbergL.Constructing meaning through information artefacts. New Review of Information Behaviour Research2003; 4: 17–30.
5.
KiiliCLaurinenLMarttunenMLeuDJ.Working on understanding during collaborative online reading. Journal of Literacy Research2012; 44: 448–483.
6.
HyldegårdJ.Beyond the search process: Exploring group members’ information behavior in context. Information Processing and Management2009; 45: 142–158.
7.
BranchJ.Instructional intervention is the key: Supporting adolescent information seeking. School Libraries Worldwide2003; 9: 47–61.
8.
WeilerA.Information-seeking behaviour in generation Y students. Journal of Academic Librarianship2005; 31: 46–53.
9.
WilliamsonKMcGregorJArchibaldASullivanJ.Information seeking and use by secondary students: The link between good practice and the avoidance of plagiarism. School Library Media Research2007; 10, http://eric.ed.gov/PDFS/EJ851698.pdf (accessed 05 December 2015).
10.
KuiperEVolmanMTerwelJ.Developing Web literacy in collaborative inquiry activities. Computers & Education2009; 52: 668–680.
11.
LimbergLHultgrenFJarnevingB.Informationssökning och lärande – en forskningsöversikt. Stockholm: Skolverket, 2002.
12.
TanniMSormunenE.A critical review of research on information behavior in assigned learning tasks. Journal of Documentation2008; 64: 893–914.
13.
McGregorJH.Cognitive processes and the use of information: A qualitative study of higher-order thinking skills used in the research process by students in a gifted program. School Library Media Annual1994; 12: 124–133.
14.
ShentonAK.The paradoxical world of young people’s information behaviour. School Libraries Worldwide2007; 13: 1–17.
15.
WallaceRMKuppermanJKrajickJSolowayE.Science on the Web: Students online in a sixth-grade classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences20009: 75–104.
16.
LimbergLAlexanderssonMLantz-AnderssonAFolkessonL.What matters? Shaping meaningful learning through teaching information literacy. Libri2008; 58: 82–91.
17.
EntwistleN.Patterns of learning and approaches to studying in higher education. Kybernetes2001; 30: 593–603.
18.
WoodFFordNMillerDSobczykGDuffinR.Information skills, searching behaviour and cognitive styles for student-centred learning: A computer-assisted learning approach. Journal of Information Science1996; 22: 79–92.
19.
HeinströmJ.Fast surfing for availability or deep diving into quality – Motivation and information seeking among middle and high school students. Information Research2006; 11: paper 265, http://InformationR.net/ir/11–4/paper265.html (accessed September 2015).
20.
EntwistleNTaitHMcCuneV.ASSIST: Approaches and study skills inventory for students. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh, 1996.
21.
McDowellL.Negotiating assignment pathways: Students and academic assignments. Teaching in Higher Education2008; 13: 423–435.
22.
PapinczakT.Are deep strategic learners more suited to PBL?Advances in Health Science Education2009; 14: 337–353.
23.
SmithCMathiasH.Medical students’ approaches to learning anatomy. Clinical Anatomy2010; 23: 106–114.
24.
BalasooriyaCHughesCTooheyS.Impact of a new integrated medicine program on students’ approach to learning. Higher Educational Research and Development2009; 28: 289–302
25.
HyldegårdJ.Personality traits and group-based information behaviour: an exploratory study. Information Research2009; 14, http://InformationR.net/ir/14–2/paper402.html (accessed September 2015).
26.
StahlG.Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006
27.
SormunenEAlamettäläTHeinströmJ.The teacher’s role as facilitator of collaborative learning in information literacy assignments. In: KurbanoğluSGrassianEMizrachiDCattsRŠpiranecS (eds) Worldwide commonalities and challenges in information literacy research and practice. Heidelberg: Springer, 2013, pp. 499–506.
28.
SormunenEAlamettäläT.Guiding students in collaborative writing of Wikipedia articles: How to get beyond the black box practice in information literacy instruction. In: ViteliJLeikomaaM (eds), Proceedings of EdMedia 2014: World conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications, 2014, Vol. 1, pp. 2122–2130, http://www.editlib.org/p/147767/ (accessed September 2015).
29.
KuhlthauCCManiotesLKCaspariAK.Guided inquiry design. Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited, 2012.
30.
ParpalaA.Exploring the experiences and conceptions of good teaching in higher education: Development of a questionnaire for assessing students’ approaches to learning and experiences of the teaching-learning environment. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, 2010.
31.
TaitHEntwistleNJMcCuneV. ASSIST: A reconceptualisation of the Approaches to Studying Inventory. In: RustC (ed.), Improving students learning: Improving students as learners. Oxford: Oxford Brookes University, 1998, pp. 262–271.
32.
McCuneVEntwistleN.Cultivating the disposition to understand in 21st century university education. Learning and Individual Differences2011; 21: 303–310.
