The paper surveys empirical studies on the relations between information searching and learning, and presents some reflections about learning in a search process based on the findings. First, the meaning of the concepts ‘learning’ and ‘searching’ is briefly defined. Learning is conceptualized as changes in one’s knowledge structures. Then it is described more in detail how learning occurs in the search process. The point of departure is to focus on tasks that require the restructuring of knowledge structures and to analyse how gradual stabilization of those structures is related to accessing and interacting with information sources. After that, empirical studies on searching and learning are categorized by identifying independent and dependent variables in those studies. In conclusion, some general remarks on the topic are presented.
ZhangPSoergelD. Towards a comprehensive model of the cognitive process and mechanisms of individual sensemaking. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology2014; 65(9): 1733–1758.
3.
VakkariP. Task based information searching. In: Annual review of information science and technology 37. Medford, NJ.: Information Today, 2003.
4.
BlandfordAAttfieldS. Interacting with Information. San Rafael, CA: Morgan and Claypool, 2010.
OrmrodJ. Human learning, 6th edn.Boston, MA: Pearson, 2012.
7.
KintschW. Comprehension. A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1998.
8.
VakkariP. Exploratory searching as conceptual exploration. In: Proceedings of 4th workshop on human–computer interaction and information retrieval, New Brunswick, NJ, 2010, 24–27.
9.
IngwersenP. Information retrieval interaction. London: Taylor Graham, 1992.
10.
LancasterWWarnerA. Information retrieval today. Arlington, VA: Information Resources Press, 1993.
11.
BelkinNJ. Interaction with texts: Information retrieval as information-seeking behavior. In: Information retrieval ‘93. Konstanz: Universitetsverlag Konstanz, 1993, pp. 55–66.
12.
MarchioniniG. Exploratory search: from finding to understanding. Communications of the ACM2006; 49(4): 41–46; doi: 10.1145/1121949
13.
MarchioniniG. Information seeking in electronic environments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
14.
VakkariPPennanenMSerolaS. Changes of search terms and tactics while writing a research proposal. Information Processing and Management2003; 39(3): 445–463.
15.
MoravejiNRussellDBienJMeaseD. Measuring improvement in user search performance resulting from optimal search tips. In: Proceedings of the 34th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval (SIGIR ‘11). New York: ACM, 2011, pp. 355–363.
16.
XieICoolC. Understanding help seeking within the context of searching digital libraries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology2009; 60(3): 477–494.
17.
WangPSoergelD. A cognitive model of document use during a research project: Study I: Document selection. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology1998; 49(2): 115–133.
18.
BelkinNJ. Anomalous states of knowledge as a basis for information retrieval. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science1980; 5: 133–143.
19.
VakkariP. Task complexity, problem structure and information actions: Integrating studies on information seeking and retrieval. Information Processing and Management1999; 35(6): 819–837.
20.
QuYFurnasG. Model-driven evaluation of exploratory search: A study under sensemaking framework. Information Processing and Management2008; 44(2): 534–555.
21.
VakkariP. A theory of the task-based information retrieval process: A summary and generalization of a longitudinal study. Journal of Documentation2001; 57(1): 44–60.
22.
BatesMJ. Information search tactics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science1979; 30(4): 205–214.
23.
PennanenMVakkariP. Students’ conceptual structure, search process and outcome while preparing a research proposal. Journal of the American Society for Information Science2003; 54(8): 759–770.
24.
KuokkanenMSavolainenJ. The growth of sociological theories. A structuralist alternative to seeking theoretical continuity. Quality and Quantity1994; 28: 345–370.
25.
SpinkAGreisdorfRBatemanJ. From highly relevant to non-relevant: examining different regions of relevance. Information Processing and Management1998; 34: 599–622.
26.
TangRSolomonP. Toward an understanding of the dynamics of relevance judgment: an analysis of one person’s search behavior. Information Processing and Management1998; 34: 237–256.
27.
VakkariPHakalaN. Changes in relevance criteria and problem stages in task performance. Journal of Documentation2000; 56: 540–562.
28.
WangP. User’s information needs at different stages of a research project: a cognitive view. In: VakkariPSavolainenRDervinB (eds) Information seeking in context. London: Taylor Graham, 1997, pp. 307–318.
29.
VakkariP. Relevance and contributing information types of searched documents in task performance. In: Proceedings of the 23rd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval (SIGIR ‘00). New York: ACM, 2000, pp. 2–9.
30.
VakkariPHuuskonenS. Search effort degrades search output but improves task outcome. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology2012; 63(4): 657–670.
31.
SutcliffeAEnnisM. Towards a cognitive theory of IR. Interacting with Computers1998; 10: 321–351.
32.
GarveyWD. Communication: The essence of science. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1979.
33.
KrathwohlDR. A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice2002; 41(4): 212–264.
34.
JansenBBoothDSmithB. Using the taxonomy of cognitive learning to model online searching. Information Processing and Management2009; 45: 643–663.
35.
ArguelloJWuW-CKellyDEdwardsA. Task complexity, vertical display and user interaction in aggregated search. In: Proceedings of the 35th international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval (SIGIR ‘12). New York: ACM, 2012, pp. 435–444.
36.
WuW-CKellyDEdwardsAArguelloJ. Grannies, tanning beds, tattoos and NASCAR: Evaluating search tasks with varying levels of cognitive complexity. In: Proceedings of IIIX’12 Conference. New York: ACM, 2012, pp. 254–257.
37.
RiehSXieI. Analysis of multiple query reformulations on the web: The interactive information retrieval context. Information Processing and Management2006; 42: 751–768.
38.
HershWPentecostJHickamD. A task-oriented approch to information retrieval. Journal of the American Society for Information Science1996; 47(1): 50–56.
39.
LiuJBelkinNJ. Searching vs. writing: Factors affecting information use task performance. In: Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 49, 2012, pp. 1–10.
40.
LiuJBelkinNJZhangXYuanX. Examining users’ knowledge change in task completion process. Information Processing and Management2013; 49(5): 1058–1074.
41.
BronMvan GorpJNackFde RijkeMVishneuskiAde LeeuwS. A subjunctive exploratory search interface to support media studies researchers. In: Proceedings of the 35th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval (SIGIR ‘12). New York: ACM, 2012, pp. 425–434.
42.
ButcherKRDaviesSCrockettADewaldAZhengR. Do graphical search interfaces support effective search for and evaluation of digital library resources? In:Proceedings of the 11th annual international ACM/IEEE joint conference on digital libraries (JCDL ‘11). New York: ACM, 2011, pp. 315–324.
43.
WildemuthB. The effects of domain knowledge on search tactic formulation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology2004; 55(3): 246–258.
44.
WilsonMJWilsonML. A comparison of techniques for measuring sensemaking and learning within participant-generated summaries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology2013; 64(2): 291–306.
45.
SormunenEHeinströmJRomuLTurunenR. A method for the analysis of information use in source-based writing. Information Research2012; 17(4), paper 535.
46.
SaitoHEgusaYTeraiHKandoNNakashimaRTakakuMMiwaM. Changes in users’ knowledge structures before and after web search on a topic: Analysis using the concept map. Proceedings of the ASIST, 2011.
47.
EickhoffCTeevanJWhiteR. Lessons from the journey: A query log analysis of within-session learning. In: Proceedings of the WSDM’14. New York: ACM, 2014, pp. 223–232.
48.
ParkT. The nature of relevance in information retrieval: An empirical study. Library Quarterly1993; 63: 318–351.
49.
KumpulainenSJärvelinK. Barriers to task-based information access in molecular medicine. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology2012; 63(1): 86–97.
50.
ButcherKRSumnerT. Self-directed learning and the sensemaking paradox. Human Computer Interaction2011; 26(1): 123–159.
