Does discarding XML declarations and changing file extensions improve the indexability and visibility of metadata tag names in web search engines?

Abstract

The aim of the study was to find out whether discarding XML declarations and changing file extensions (i.e. .xml) improve the indexability and visibility of DCXML, MARCXML and MODS element tag names in Web search engines. Two groups of metadata records were included in an experimental study: an experimental group composed of 300 XML-based records without XML declarations and with file extensions according to the name of related metadata standards, and a control group composed of 300 XML-based records with the normal XML structure. These were analysed through an experimental approach. The two sets of records were published on two separate websites and then the sites were introduced to Google and Yahoo!. Findings showed that Google and Yahoo! indexed and retrieved all the tag names relating to the experimental group. However they did not index the tag names in the control group’s records. Based on the findings, some patterns are suggested to metadata creators and Web search engine developers.

Keywords

Element tag names file extensions indexability,visibility metadata standards Web search engines XML declarations

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Humphreys

. Mind maps: Hot new tools proposed for cyberspace librarians, http://www.wordmapsindexing.com/old-wmaps/artsearcher.shtml (1999, accessed 8 August 2014).

Qin

. Representation and organization of information in the Web space: From MARC to XML, http://inform.nu/Articles/Vol3/v3n2p83-88.pdf (2000, accessed 8 August 2014).

Luk

Leong

Dillon

Chan

ATS

Croft

Allan

. A survey in indexing and searching XML documents, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.10056/full (2002, accessed 8 August 2014).

Bogaards

. Metadata and XML: Improving the findability of information, http://www.bogieland.com/taxi/metadata_and_xml.pdf (2004, accessed 8 August 2014).

Gigee

. MARC and MARCXML. http://threegee.files.wordpress.com/2006/05/marcxml.pdf (2006, accessed 5 November 2012).

Farance

Gillman

. Not as hard as it sounds: Using XML in Metadata-enabled infrastructure, http://jtc1sc32.org/doc/N1851-1900/32N1896-ISO_Focus-metadata.pdf (2007 accessed 8 August 2014).

Farajpahlou

Tabatabai Amiri

. How are XML-based Marc 21 and Dublin Core records indexed and ranked by general search engines in dynamic online environments? Aslib Proceedings 2011; 63(6): 586–592.

Taheri

Hariri

. A comparative study on the indexing and ranking of the content objects including the MARCXML and Dublin Core’s metadata elements by general search engines. Electronic Library 2012; 30(4): 480–491.

Bray

Paoli

Sperberg-McQueen

Maler

Yergeau

. Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (5th edn). W3C Recommendation, 26 November 2008, http://www.w3.org/TR/xml/ (accessed 8 August 2014).

10.

Luk

Chan

Dillon

Leong

. A survey of search engines for XML documents, http://www.haifa.il.ibm.com/sigir00-xml/final-papers/Luk/XMLSUR.htm (2000, accessed 8 August 2014).

11.

Hirwade

. A study of metadata standards. Library Hi Tech News 2011; 28(7): 18–25.

12.

Aqa Abedi

. The effect of syntax on the indexing and ranking of Metadata Records by the Web Search Engine: A Comparative Study on MARCXML and DCXML Metadata Records. MA thesis, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Iran, 2012.

13.

SEW Staff. How search engines work, http://searchenginewatch.com/article/2065173/How-Search-Engines-Work (2007, accessed 8 August 2014).

14.

Turner

Brackbill

. Rising to the top: Evaluating the use of the HTML META tag to improve retrieval of World Wide Web documents through Internet search engines, http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=1748620 (1998, accessed 8 August 2014).

15.

Quevedo-Torrero

. Improving Web retrieval by mining the HTML tags for keywords and exploring the hyperlink structures Web pages. PhD thesis, University of Houston, 2004.

16.

Zhang

Dimitroff

. The impact of metadata implementation on Webpage visibility in search engine result (part II), http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306457303001134; doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2003.12.002 (2005, accessed 8 August 2014).

17.

Sokvitne

. An evaluation of the effectiveness of current Dublin Core metadata for retrieval, http://www.vala.org.au/vala2000/2000pdf/Sokvitne.PDF (2000, accessed 08 August 2014).

18.

Safari

. Search engine and resource discovery on the Web: Is Dublin Core an impact factor, http://www.webology.ir/2005/v2n2/a13.html (2005, accessed 8 August 2014).

19.

Henshaw

Valauskas

. Metadata as a catalyst: Experiments with metadata and search engines in the internet journal. First Monday, http://www.librijournal.org/pdf/1999-3pp125-131.pdf (2001, accessed 8 August 2014).

20.

Zhang

Dimitroff

. Internet search engine’s response to metadata Dublin Core implementation, http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1142111; doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2005.05.002 (2004, accessed 8 August 2014).

21.

Zhang

Dimitroff

. The impact of Web page content characteristics on webpage visibility in search engine result (Part I), http://web.simmons.edu/~braun/467/part_1.pdf (2005, accessed 8 August 2014).

22.

Mohamed

KAF

. The impact of metadata in Web resources discovering. Online Information Review 2006; 30(2): 155–167.

23.

Sharif

. Study the effectiveness of Metadata elements on web page visibility in public search engines, http://eprints.rclis.org/handle/10760/9171#.UHPNcVG94hA (2007, accessed 8 August 2014).

24.

ComScore. ComScore Releases May 2012, US Search Engine Rankings, http://www.comscore.com/Press_Events/Press_Releases/2012/6/comScore_Releases_May_2012_U.S._Search_Engine_Rankings (2012, accessed 8 August 2014).

25.

Alexa: The Web Information Company. Global top 500, http://www.alexa.com/topsites (2014, accessed 8 August 2014).

26.

Campex. Top Search Engines, http://capmex.biz/resources/top-search-engines (2014, accessed 8 August 2014).

27.

Lewis

. Top Ten Search Engines, http://www.seoconsultants.com/search-engines/ (2013, accessed 8 August 2014).

28.

Gill

. Metadata and the Web: Introduction to Metadata, http://www.getty.edu/research/publications/electronic_publications/intrometadata/metadata.pdf (2008, accessed 8 August 2014).

29.

Harold

. Effective XML, http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/effectivexml/chapters/01.html (2012, accessed 8 August 2014).

30.

Microsoft Developer Network (MSDN). XML Declaration, http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms256048.aspx (2012, accessed 8 August 2014).

31.

Validome. Error in the XML-Declaration, http://www.validome.org/lang/en/errors/XML-DECLARATION (2012, accessed 8 August 2014).

32.

Tizag. XML Tutorial, http://www.tizag.com/xmlTutorial/xmlprolog.php (2012, accessed 8 August 2014)

33.

Taheri

Hariri

Fattahi

. Using data island method for creating metadata records with indexability and visibility of tag names in Web search engines. Library Hi Tech 2014; 32(1): 83–97.

34.

Fattahi

. Super records: An approach towards the description of works appearing in various manifestations. Library Review 1996; 45(4): 19–29.