In this paper we focus on unsupervised sentiment analysis in Spanish. The lack of resources for languages other than English, as for example Spanish, adds more complexity to the task. However, we take advantage of some good already existing lexical resources. We have carried out several experiments using different unsupervised approaches in order to compare the different methodologies for solving the problem of the Spanish polarity classification in a corpus of movie reviews. Among all these approaches, perhaps the newest one integrates SentiWordNet with the Multilingual Central Repository to tackle polarity detection directly over the Spanish corpus. However, the results obtained were not as promising as we expected, and so we carried out another group of experiments combining all the methods using meta-classifiers. The results obtained with stacking outperformed the individual experiments and encourage us to continue in this way.
PangBLeeL. Thumbs up?: Sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. In: Proceedings of the ACL-02 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, Vol. 10. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2002, pp. 79–86.
2.
TurneyPD. Thumbs up or thumbs down?: Semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. In: Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2002, pp. 417–424.
3.
BaccianellaSEsuliASebastianiF. Sentiwordnet 3.0: An enhanced lexical resource for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In: Proceedings of the seventh international conference on language resources and evaluation (LREC’10). Valleta, Malta: European Language Resources Association, 2010.
4.
AtseriasJ. The MEANING Multilingual Central Repository. In: Proceedings of the second international global WordNet conference (GWC’04), Brno, Czech Republic2004.
5.
Gonzalez-AgirreALaparraERigauG. Multilingual Central Repository version 3.0. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on language resources and evaluation (LREC’12), Istambul, Turkey, 2012.
6.
MihalceaRBaneaCWiebeJ. Learning multilingual subjective language via cross-lingual projections. In: Proceedings of annual meeting – Association for Computational Linguistics2007; 45(1): 976–983.
7.
LiuB. Sentiment analysis and opinion mining. Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies Series2012; 5(1): 1–167.
8.
TsytsarauMPalpanasT. Survey on mining subjective data on the web. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery2012; 24(3): 478–514.
9.
HuMLiuB. Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, Seattle, WA, 2004, pp. 168–177.
10.
HatzivassiloglouVWiebeJ. Effects of adjective orientation and gradability on sentence subjectivity. In: Proceedings of the international conference on computational linguistics, 2000, pp. 299–305.
11.
TaboadaMBrookeJTofiloskiMVollKStedeM. Lexicon-based methods for sentiment analysis. Computational Linguistics37(2): 267–307.
12.
WilsonTWiebeJHoffmannP. Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of the human language technology conference and the conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, 2005, pp. 347–354.
13.
KampsJMarxMMokkenRJde RijkeM. Using WordNet to measure semantic orientation of adjectives. In: The fourth international conference on language resources and evaluation, 2004, pp. 1115–1118.
14.
De AlbornozJCPlazaLGervásP. SentiSense: An easily scalable concept-based affective lexicon for sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of the eighth international conference on language resources and evaluation (LREC’12), 2012, pp. 3562–3567.
15.
ChaumartinFR. UPAR7: a knowledge-based system for headline sentiment tagging. In: Proceedings of the 4th international workshop on semantic evaluations, SemEval’07, Association for Computational Linguistics, 2007, pp. 422–425.
16.
ThetTTNaJCKhooCSG. Aspect-based sentiment analysis of movie reviews on discussion boards. Journal of Information Science2010; 36(6): 823–848.
17.
ZhangCZengDLiJWangF-YZuoW. Sentiment analysis of Chinese documents: From sentence to document level. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology2009; 60(12): 2474–2487.
18.
AgićZLjubešićNTadićM. Towards sentiment analysis of financial texts in Croatian. In: Proceedings of language resources and evaluation, European Language Resources Association2010; pp. 1164-1167.
19.
Rushdi-SalehMMartín-ValdiviaMTUreña-LópezLAPerea-OrtegaJM. OCA: Opinion corpus for Arabic. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology2011; 62: 2045–2054.
20.
BaneaCMihalceaRWiebeJHassanS. Multilingual subjectivity analysis using machine translation. In: Proceedings of the conference on empirical methods in natural language processing. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2008, pp. 127–135.
21.
BrookeJTofloskiMTaboadaM. Cross-linguistic sentiment analysis: From English to Spanish. In: Proceedings of the international conference RANLP-2009, 2009, pp. 50–54.
22.
CruzFLTroyanoJAEnriquezFOrtegaJ. Experiments in sentiment classification of movie reviews in Spanish. Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural2008; 41: 79–80.
23.
DeneckeK. Using SentiWordNet for multilingual sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of Data engineering Workshop, ICDEW, IEEE 24th International Conference, 2008, pp. 507–512.
24.
GhorbelHJacotD. Sentiment analysis of French movie reviews. Advances in Distributed Agent-Based Retrieval Tools2011; 361: 97–108.
25.
Martín-ValdiviaMTMartínez-CámaraEPerea-OrtegaJMUreña-LópezLA. Sentiment polarity detection in Spanish reviews combining supervised and unsupervised approaches. Expert Systems with Applications2013; 40(10): 3934–3942.
26.
Perea-OrtegaJMMartín-ValdiviaMTUreña-LópezLAMartínez-CámaraE. Improving polarity classification of bilingual parallel corpora combining machine learning and semantic orientation approaches. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology2013; 64(9): 1864–1877.
27.
Martínez-CámaraEMartín-ValidiviaMTMolina-GonzálezMDUreña-LópezLA . Bilingual experiments on an opinion comparable corpus. In: Proceedings of the 4th workshop on computational approaches to subjectivity, sentiment and social media analysis, Atlanta, Georgia. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2013, pp. 87–93.
28.
Wolpertd H. Stacked generalization. Neural Networks1992; 5: 241–259.
29.
Molina-GonzálezMDMartínez-CámaraEMartín-ValdiviaMTPerea-OrtegaJM. Semantic orientation for polarity classification in Spanish reviews. Expert Systems with Applications2013; 40(18): 7250–7257.
30.
RokachL. Ensemble methods for classifiers. In: MalmonORokachL (eds) Data mining and knowledge discovery handbook. New York: Springer, 2005, pp. 957–980.
31.
FreundYSchapireRE. Experiments with a new boosting algorithm. In: Machine learning: Proceedings of the thirteenth international conference, 1996, pp. 325–332.
32.
KennedyAInkpenD. Sentiment classification of movie reviews using contextual valence shifters. Computational Intelligence2006; 22(2): 110–125.
33.
WanX. Using bilingual knowledge and ensemble techniques for unsupervised Chinese sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of the conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, 2008, pp. 553–561.
34.
BaneaCMihalceaR.WiebeJ. Multilingual subjectivity: Are more languages better? In: Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on computational linguistics, 2010, pp. 28–36.
35.
WiebeJWilsonTCardieC. Annotating expressions of opinions and emotions in language. Language Resources and Evaluation2005; 39(2–3): 165–210.
36.
BalahurATurchiM. Comparative experiments using supervised learning and machine translation for multilingual sentiment analysis. Computer Speech & Language2014; 28(1): 56–75.
GenkinHLewisDMadiganD. Large-scale Bayesian logistic regression for text categorization. Technometrics2004; 49(3): 291–384.
39.
Ortiz-MartosAMartín-ValdiviaMTUreña-LópezLACumbreras-GarcíaMA. Detección automática de Spam utilizando Regresión Logística Bayesiana. Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural2005; 35: 127–133.
40.
Martínez-CámaraEMartín-ValdiviaMTUreña LópezLA. Opinion classification techniques applied to a Spanish corpus. In: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on natural language processing and information systems, 2011, pp. 169–176.
41.
Del-HoyoRHupontILacuevaFJAbadíaD. Hybrid text affect sensing system for emotional language analysis. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on affective-aware virtual agents and social robots, 2009.
42.
BarreiroAGonçalo-OliveiraH. Cross-language semantic relations between English and Portuguese. In: Proceedings of the workshop on Iberian cross-language natural language processing tasks, 2011, pp. 49–58.
43.
Malvar-FernándezPPichel-CamposJR. Generación semiautomática de recursos de Opinion Mining para el gallego a partir del portugués y el español. In: Proceedings of the workshop on Iberian cross-language natural language processing tasks, 2011, pp. 59–63.
44.
SchmidH. Probabilistic part-of-speech tagging using decision trees. In: Proceedings of the international conference on new methods in language processing, Vol. 12, 1994, pp. 44–49.
45.
PolanyiLZaenenA. Contextual valence shifters. In WiebeJanyce (eds) Computing attitude and affect in text: Theory and applications. Dordrecht: Springer, 2006, pp. 1–10.
