This paper examines some characteristics of the ‘British School’ of information science. Three main forces driving the development of the new subject in Britain are identified: the documentation movement; special libraries; and the need for better treatment of scientific and technical information. Five characteristics which, taken together, distinguish the early British approach to information science from those adopted elsewhere are identified: its subject-based nature; its broad approach to information and information science; its status as an academic subject with a strong professional remit; its involvement with, but distinction from, information technology; and its involvement with memory institutions. Lessons are drawn for the future development of the information sciences.
RobinsonLBawdenD. So wide and varied: The origins of British information science. Paper presented at Information science in Europe, seminar organized by the European Chapter of the American Society of Information Science and Technology, Zadar, Croatia, 22 June 2012, http://ozk.unizd.hr/proceedings/index.php/lida2012/article/view/99/86
2.
BawdenDRobinsonL. Introduction to information science. London: Facet, 2012.
3.
RobinsonLBawdenD. Brian Vickery and the foundations of information science. In: GilchristAVernauJ (eds) Facets of knowledge organization. Bingley: Emerald, 2012, pp. 281–300.
BawdenD. Smoother pebbles and the shoulders of giants: The developing foundations of information science. Journal of Information Science2008; 34(4): 415–426.
6.
LarivièreVSugimotoCRCroninB. A bibliometric chronicling of library and information science’s first hundred years. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology2012; 63(5): 997–1016.
7.
GilchristA (ed.) Information science in transition. London: Facet, 2009.
8.
VickeryBC. A long search for information. Occasional paper no. 213. Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, 2004, reprinted. In: Gilchrist A and Vernau J (eds) Facets of knowledge organization. Bingley: Emerald, 2012, pp. 145–174.
9.
RaywardWBBowdenME (eds) The history and heritage of scientific and technological information systems. Medford, NJ: Information Today, 2004.
10.
HahnTBBucklandM (eds) Historical studies in information science. Medford, NJ: Information Today, 1998.
11.
BucklandMKLiuZ. History of information science. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology1995; 30: 385–416. [An updated version is presented in Hahn TB and Buckland M (eds), Historical studies in information science. Medford, NJ: Information Today, 1998, pp. 272–295.]
12.
MuddimanD. Public science in Britain and the origins of documentation and information science, 1890–1950. In: RaywardWB (ed.), European modernism and the information society. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008, pp. 202–222.
13.
Ibekwe-SanJuanF. The French conception of Information Science: ‘Une exception Française’?Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology2012; 63(9): 1693–1709.
14.
ShapiroFR. Coinage of the termInformation Science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science1995; 46(5): 384–385.
15.
FarradaneJ. Towards a true information science. The Information Scientist1976; 10(3): 91–101.
16.
MuddimanD. A new history of ASLIB (1924–1950). Journal of Documentation2005; 61(3): 402–428.
17.
RobinsonLBawdenD. Information (and library) science at City University London: Fifty years of educational development. Journal of Information Science2010; 36(5): 618–630.
18.
RobinsonL. Information science: Communication chain and domain analysis. Journal of Documentation2009; 65(4): 578–591.
19.
BlackA. Mechanisation in libraries and information retrieval: Punched cards and microfilm before the widespread adoption of computer technology in libraries. Library History2007; 23(4): 291–3000 .
20.
VarlejsJ. The technical report and its impact on post-World War II information systems: Two case studies. In: RaywardWBBowdenME (eds) The history and heritage of scientific and technological information systems. Medford, NJ: Information Today, 2004, pp. 89–99.
21.
KilgourFG. Origins of coordinate searching. Journal of the American Society for Information Science1998; 48(4): 340–348.
22.
GleickJ. The information: A history, a theory, a flood. London: Fourth Estate, 2011.
23.
BlackABruntR. Information management in business, libraries and British military intelligence: Towards a history of information management. Journal of Documentation1999; 55(4): 361–374.
24.
BlackA. Technical libraries in British industrial and commercial enterprises before 1950. In: RaywardWBBowdenME (eds) The history and heritage of scientific and technological information systems. Medford, NJ: Information Today, 2004, pp. 281–290.
25.
RaywardWB. Visions of Xanadu: Paul Otlet (1868–1944) and hypertext. Journal of the American Society for Information Science1994; 45(4): 235–250.
26.
RaywardWB. The origins of information science and the International Institute of Bibliography/International Federation for Information and Documentation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science1997; 48(4): 289–300.
27.
Van den HeuvelC. Building society, constructing knowledge, weaving the Web: Otlet’s visualizations of a global information society and his concept of a universal civilization. In: RaywardWB (ed.), European modernism and the information society. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008, pp. 128–153.
28.
DavisCHShawD. Introduction to information science and technology. Medford, NJ: Information Today, 2011, chapter 2.
29.
WilliamsRV. The documentation and special libraries movement in the United States, 1910–1960. Journal of the American Society for Information Science1997; 48(9): 775–781. [Reprinted with a postscript in Hahn TB and Buckland M (eds), Historical studies in information science. Medford, NJ: Information Today, 1998, pp. 173–180.]
30.
Farkas-ConnIS. From documentation to information science. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1990.
31.
McIlwaineIC. The Universal Decimal Classification: Some factors concerning its origins, development and influence. Journal of the American Society for Information Science1997; 48(4): 331–339.
32.
DitmasEMR. The literature of special librarianship. Aslib Proceedings1950; 2(4): 217–243.
33.
BernalJD. Information service as an essential in the progress of science. In: Proceedings of the 20th conference of Aslib. London: Aslib, 1945, pp. 20–24. [Reprinted in Meadows AJ (ed.) The origins of information science. London: Taylor Graham, 1987, pp. 245–252.]
BucklandM. Documentation, information science and library science in the USA. Information Processing and Management1996; 32(1): 63–76.
36.
LandesD. The unbound Prometheus: Technological change and industrial development in Western Europe from 1750 to the present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.
37.
ChandlerAD. Shaping the industrial century: The remarkable story of the evolution of the modern chemical and pharmaceutical industries. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.
38.
BawdenDRobinsonL. The dark side of information: Overload, anxiety and other paradoxes and pathologies. Journal of Information Science2009; 35(2): 180–191.
39.
JusticeA. Information science as a facet of the history of British science: The origins of the Classification Research Group. In: RaywardWBBowdenME (eds) The history and heritage of scientific and technological information systems. Medford, NJ: Information Today, 2004, pp. 267–280.
40.
LineMB. An information world apart: The Royal Society Scientific Information Conference of 1948 in the light of 1998. Journal of Documentation1998; 54(3): 284–292.
41.
EastH. Professor Bernal’s ‘insidious and cavalier proposals’: The Royal Society Scientific Information Conference, 1948. Journal of Documentation1998; 54(3): 293–302.
42.
SimpsonI. Education for information science. 1: The United Kingdom. Journal of Information Science1979; 1(1): 49–58.
43.
VickeryBCVickeryA. Information science in theory and practice (1st edn). London: Bowker-Saur, 1987.
44.
HapkeT. Eric Pietsch: International connections of a German pioneer in information science. In: RaywardWBBowdenME (eds) The history and heritage of scientific and technological information systems. Medford, NJ: Information Today, 2004, pp. 327–338.
45.
GilchristA. Editorial. Journal of Information Science1979; 1(1): 1–2.
46.
MacDonaldBH. Implications of nationalism in the development of the scientific information infrastructure in North America in the decades leading up to World War II. In: RaywardWBBowdenME (eds) The history and heritage of scientific and technological information systems. Medford, NJ: Information Today, 2004, pp. 215–227.
47.
MuddimanD. Red information science: JD Bernal and the nationalization of scientific information in Britain from 1930 to 1949. In: RaywardWBBowdenME (eds) The history and heritage of scientific and technological information systems. Medford, NJ: Information Today, 2004, pp. 258–266.
48.
MuddimanD. Red information scientist – the information career of JD Bernal. Journal of Documentation2003; 59(4): 387–409.
49.
HjørlandBAlbrechtsenH. Toward a new horizon in information science: Domain-analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science1995; 46(6): 400–425.
50.
HahnTB. Pioneers of the online age. Information Processing and Management1996; 32(1): 33–48.
51.
CoatesEJ. The role of classification in information retrieval: Action and thought in the contribution of Brian Vickery. Journal of Documentation1988; 44(3): 216–225.
52.
VickeryBC. Introduction. In: VickeryBC (ed.) Fifty years of information progress. London: Aslib, 1994, pp. 1–4.
53.
SaundersWL. The nature of information science.The Information Scientist1974; 8(2): 57–70.
54.
DaltonMS. The role of subject specialism in the future development of information services. Journal of Information Science1979; 1(2): 107–112.
55.
JacksonM. Subject specialists in the 21st century library. Oxford: Chandos, 2010.
56.
HjørlandB. Domain analysis in information science. Eleven approaches – traditional as well as innovative. Journal of Documentation2002; 58(4): 422–464.
57.
VickeryBC. Information systems. London: Butterworth, 1973.
58.
MeadowsAJ. Theory in information science. Journal of Information Science1990; 16(1): 59–63.
59.
IngwersenP. Information retrieval interaction. London: Taylor Graham, 1992.
60.
WebberS. Information science in 2003: A critique. Journal of Information Science2003; 29(4): 311–330.
61.
MachlupFMansfieldU. Cultural diversity in studies of information. In: MachlupFMansfieldU (eds) The study of information: Interdisciplinary messages. New York: Wiley, 1983, pp. 3–56.
62.
DillonA. So what is this thing called information? In: van OostendorpHBreureLDillonA (eds) Creation, deployment and use of digital information. Mahwah, NJ: LEA, 2005, pp. 307–316.
63.
VickeryBC. Meeting the challenge. In: GilchristA (ed.) Information science in transition. London: Facet, 2009, pp. xxi–xxix.
64.
NegroponteN. Being digital. London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1995.
65.
La BarreK. Weaving webs of significance: The Classification Research Study Group in the United States and Canada. In: RaywardWBBowdenME (eds) The history and heritage of scientific and technological information systems. Medford, NJ: Information Today, 2004, pp. 246–257.
66.
GilchristA. Classifications and thesauri. In: VickeryBC (ed.) Fifty years of information progress. London: Aslib, 1994, pp. 85–118.
67.
BroughtonV. Brian Vickery and the Classification Research Group: The legacy of faceted classification. In: GilchristAVernauJ (eds) Facets of knowledge organization. Bingley: Emerald, 2012, pp. 315–326.
68.
RobertsonSE. Computer retrieval. In: VickeryBC (ed.) Fifty years of information progress. London: Aslib, 1994, pp. 119–146.
69.
RobertsonSE. On the history of evaluation in IR. In: GilchristA (ed.) Information science in transition. London: Facet, 2009, pp. 63–93.
70.
BourneCPHahnTB. A history of online information services. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003.
71.
HallJL. Online retrieval history: How it all began. Some personal recollections. Journal of Documentation2011; 67(1): 182–193.
72.
RobertsN. The pre-history of the information retrieval thesaurus. Journal of Documentation1984; 40(4): 271–285.
KrajewskiM. Paper machines: About cards and catalogs, 1548–1929. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2011.
75.
BucklandM. Emanuel Goldberg and his knowledge machine. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited, 2006.
76.
WilsonT. The information user: Past, present and future. In: GilchristA (ed.) Information science in transition. London: Facet, 2009, pp. 96–107.
77.
DysonGMFarradaneJEL. Education in information work: The syllabus and present curriculum of the Institute of Information Scientists Ltd. Journal of Chemical Documentation1962; 2(2): 74–76. [Reprinted in Journal of Information Science 2002; 28(1): 79–81.]
78.
VickeryBC. Concepts of documentation. Journal of Documentation1978; 34(4): 279–287.
79.
OckenfeldMSamulowitzH. Libraries and documentation: A long-lasting conflict. In: RaywardWBBowdenME (eds) The history and heritage of scientific and technological information systems. Medford, NJ: Information Today, 2004, pp. 310–326.
GivenLMMcTavishL. What’s old is new again: The reconvergence of libraries, archives and museums in the digital age. Library Quarterly2010; 80(1): 7–32.
83.
WarwickCTerrasMNyhanJ (eds) Digital humanities in practice. London: Facet, 2012.
84.
BawdenD. Organised complexity, meaning and understanding: An approach to a unified view of information for information science. Aslib Proceedings2007; 59(4/5): 307–327.
85.
WilsonTD. Information and information science: An address on the occasion of receiving the award of Doctor Honoris Causa, at the University of Murcia, September 2010. Information Research2010; 15(4): paper 349, http://informationr.net/ir/15-4/paper439.html
