This paper surveys the main data models used in projects including the management of changes in digital normative legislation. Models have been classified based on a set of criteria, which are also proposed in the paper. Some projects have been chosen as representative for each kind of model. The advantages and problems of each type are analysed, and future trends are identified.
FarahFRousselotF. DARES: Documents annotation and recombining system, application to the European law. Artificial Intelligence and Law2007; 15: 83–102.
3.
Martínez GonzálezM. Document versioning in digital libraries. In: Encyclopedia of database technologies and applications (DBEncyclopedia). USA: Idea Group Reference, 2005, pp. 201–205.
4.
MoensM. Innovative techniques for legal text retrieval. Artificial Intelligence and Law2001; 9: 29–57.
5.
MaierR.Evaluation of data modelling. In: EderJRozmanIWelzerT (eds) Advances in databases and information systems. Berlin: Springer, 1999, pp. 232–246.
6.
LoggheMVan de KerchoveK. Agora Lex. Newsletter BNVKI2000; 17: 67–70.
7.
MoensMLoggheMVan de KerckhoveK. Management of consolidated legislation in Belgium. In: DumortierJRobbenFTaeymansM (eds) A decade of research @ the crossroads of law & ICT. Gent: Larcier, 2000, pp. 329–342.
8.
VitaliF. Using XML as a means to access legislative documents: Italian and foreign experiences. SIGAPP Applied Computing Review2002; 10: 54–62.
9.
PeriA. SIDRA: XML en la gestión y explotación de la documentación jurídica. SCIRE2009; 15: 111–124.
Arnold-MooreT. Automatically processing amendments to legislation. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on artificial intelligence and law (ICAIL ’95), 1995. New York: ACM.
13.
Arnold-MooreT. Automatic generation of amendment legislation. Sixth international conference on artificial intelligence and law (ICAIL’ 97), Melbourne, 1997, pp. 56–62.
14.
Martínez GonzálezMDe la FuentePDerniameJ. XML as a means to support information extraction from legal documents. International Journal of Computer Systems, Science and Engineering2003; 8(5): 263–277.
15.
Martínez GonzálezMDerniameJDe la FuenteP. A method for the dynamic generation of virtual versions of evolving documents. 17th ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC 2002), Special Track on Database and Digital Library Technologies, Madrid, March2002.
16.
ChoquetteMPoulinDBratleyP. Compelling legal hypertexts. Database and expert systems applications, 6th international conference, DEXA’95, 1996, Vol. 978, pp. 449–458.
17.
RiveroJHernándezR. Cronolex: Sistema para la representación dinámica de cuerpos legales. SCIRE2009; 15: 133–147.
18.
GrandiFMandreoliFTiberioP. Temporal modelling and management of normative documents in XML format. Data & Knowledge Engineering2005; 54: 327–354.
19.
PalmiraniMBrighiR. Norma-system: A legal document system for managing consolidated acts. In: DEXA 2002. Database and expert systems applications. Berlin: Springer, 2002; 310–320.
20.
FrancesconiE. The ‘Norme in Rete’- project: Standards and tools for Italian legislation. International Journal of Legal Information2006; 34: 358–376.
21.
PierLuigiS. URN standard of NiRProject. Institute of Legal Information Theory and Techniques Italian National Research Council (ITTIG/CNR, Florence), http://www.stf.jus.br/arquivo/sijed/22.pdf (2007, accessed May 2012).
BiagioliCCappelliAFrancesconniETurchiF. Law making environment: Perspectives. In: Proceedings of the V legislative XML workshop. European Press Academic Publishing, 2007, pp. 267–281.
SheridanJTennisonJ. Linking UK government data. In: Proceedings of the linked data on the Web workshop (LDOW2010), Raleigh, NC, 27 April 2010, CEUR-WS.org/Vol-628/ldow2010_paper14.pdf
27.
HoekstraR. The MetaLex document server – legal documents as versioned linked data. In: AroyoLWeltyCAlaniHTaylorJBernsteinA (eds) Proceedings of the 10th international conference on the Semantic Web (ISWC’11), Vol. II. Berlin: Springer, pp. 128–143.
