This paper presents an exemplification and discussion of the contemporaneity of Erving Goffman’s work and of its applicability to the analysis of identity and presentation of self in the blogging and Second Life (SL) contexts. An analysis of online identity and interaction practices in 10 different cases of bloggers and SL inhabitants and of their online spaces is presented in terms of: expressions given; embellishment as a minor form of persona adoption; dividing the self; conforming and ‘fitting in’; and masking, anonymity and pseudonimity. The key finding of the research is that, contrary to engaging with the process of whole persona adoption, participants were keen to re-create their offline self online, but engaged in editing facets of self. This emphasizes the key premise in Goffman’s work that, when in ‘front stage’, people deliberately chose to project a given identity. It is concluded that Goffman’s original framework is of great usefulness as an explanatory framework for understanding identity through interaction and the presentation of self in the online world. Equally, the online environment, with its enhanced potential for editing the self, can offer opportunities to contribute to the further development of the Goffman framework.
GoffmanE. The presentation of self in everyday life. London: Penguin, 1990.
2.
GoffmanE. On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes1955; 18: 213–231.
3.
BrownJD. The self. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill, 1998.
4.
ParkR. Race and culture. Michigan: Free Press, 1950.
5.
GoffmanE. The interaction order: American Sociological Association, 1982 presidential address. American Sociological Review1983; 48: 1–17.
6.
GoffmanE. The neglected situation. American Anthropologist1964; 66: 133–136.
7.
GoffmanE. Relations in public: Microstudies of the public order. London: Penguin, 1971.
8.
ArundaleR. Face as emergent in interpersonal communication: An alternative to Goffman. In: Bargiela-chiappiniFHaughM (eds) Face, communication and social interaction. London: Equinox, 2010, pp. 33–54.
9.
MillerH. The presentation of self in electronic life: Goffman on the Internet. Proceedings of the embodied knowledge and virtual space conference, London, http://www.dourish.com/classes/ics234cw04/miller2.pdf (1995, accessed May 2012).
HodkinsonPLincolnS. Online journals as virtual bedrooms?Young: Nordic Journal of Youth Research2008; 16: 27–46.
12.
JenkinsR. The 21st century interaction order. In: Hviid JacobsenM (ed.) The contemporary Goffman. London: Routledge, 2010, pp. 257–274.
13.
LaugheyD. Key themes in media theory. Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2007, p. 79.
14.
JacobsenM. Goffman through the looking glass: From ‘classical’ to contemporary Goffman. In: JacobsenM (ed.) The contemporary Goffman. London: Routledge, 2010, pp.1–50.
15.
MillerHArnoldJ. Identity in cyberspace. In: WheelerS (ed.) Connected minds, emerging cultures: Cybercultures in online learning. Greenwich: IAP, 2009, pp. 53–64.
16.
BaptistaL. Framing and cognition. In: TreviñoA (ed.) Goffman’s legacy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2003, pp. 197–215.
17.
VaastE. Playing with masks: Fragmentation and continuity in the presentation of self in an occupational online forum. Information Technology and People2007; 20: 334–351.
18.
WhitworthA. Information obesity. Oxford: Chandos, 2009, pp. 49–50.
19.
WaggonerZ. My avatar, my self: Identity in video role-playing games. London: McFarland, 2009, p. 1.
20.
BakerAJ. Mick or Keith: Blended identity of online rock fans. Identity in the Information Society2009; 2: 7–21.
21.
GoffmanE. interaction Ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. New York: Pantheon Books, 1982, p. 18.
22.
DonathJ. Mediated faces. In: BeynonM (ed.) Cognitive technology: Instruments of the mind. Berlin: Springer, 2001 pp. 373–390.
23.
DucheneautNBody and mind: A study of avatar personalization in three virtual worlds. In: Proceedings of the 27th international conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI ‘09). New York: ACM Press, 2009, pp. 1151–1160.
24.
BailensonJNBeallAC. Transformed social interaction: Exploring the digital plasticity of avatars. In: SchroederRAxelssonRS (eds) Avatars at work and play: Collaboration and interaction in shared virtual environments. London: Springer, 2006, pp. 1–16.
25.
BoellstorffT. Coming of age in Second Life: An anthropologist explores the virtually human. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008.
26.
NakamuraL. Cybertypes: Race, ethnicity, and identity on the Internet. New York: Routledge, 2002, p. 14.
27.
JonesDE. I, avatar: Constructions of self and place in Second Life and the technological imagination. Gnovis, Journal of Communication, Culture and Technology2006; 6: 1–32.
HartleyJ. Case study research. In: CassellCSymonG (eds) Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research. London: Sage, 2004, pp. 323–333.
44.
PickardA. Access to electronic information resources: Their role in the provision of learning opportunities to young people – a constructivist inquiry. PhD thesis. University of Northumbria, Newcastle, 2002.
45.
BrymanA. Social research methods, 3rd edn.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
46.
Frankfort-NachmiasCNachmiasD. Research methods in the social sciences, 4th edn.London: Edward Arnold, 1992.
47.
StraussACorbinJ. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1990.
48.
MäkeläMTurcanRV. Handbook of qualitative research methods in entrepreneurship, NeergaardHUlhøiJP (eds). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2007.
49.
SilvermanD. A very short, fairly interesting and reasonably cheap book about qualitative research. London: Sage, 2007.
50.
MalabyTM. Making virtual worlds: Linden Lab and second life. London: Cornell University Press, 2009.
51.
LeeDImSTaylorCR. Voluntary self-disclosure of information on the internet: A multimethod study of the motivations and consequences of disclosing information on blogs. Psychology and Marketing2008; 25: 692–710.
52.
BarghJAMcKennaKYFitzsimonsGM. Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the ‘true self’ on the internet. Journal of Social Issues2002; 58: 33–48.
VasalouAJoinsonA. Me, myself and I: The role of interactional context on self-presentation through avatars. Computers in Human Behavior2009; 25: 510–520.
