A bibliometric analysis of author keywords in articles from nine Korean theological journals published from 2000 to 2008 found 10 clusters that represent the intellectual structure of Korean theology. Three main streams of Korean theology studies were identified: Reformed theology, general theology, and evangelicalism. The intellectual structures of the representative journal for each stream were examined in depth. To visualize these intellectual structures, we used co-word analysis and a Pathfinder network (PFnet) algorithm. The Pathfinder network was constructed by two approaches: first-order cosine coefficients and second-order correlation coefficients. Semantic review of the results suggests that second-order correlation coefficients more effectively present the intellectual structure of a domain by PFnet.
KimSW. The impact of the Christianity on the Economic Growth of South Korea. Faith and Scholarship2010; 15(3): 7–45.
2.
Statistics Korea. ‘Population Census’, http://kostat.go.kr (2005, accessed April 2010).
3.
MorrisSAVan der Veer MartensB. Mapping research specialties. ARIST2008; 42: 213–295.
4.
KesslerM. M.1963. Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation1963; 14(1): 10–25.
5.
GlänzelWCzerwonHJ. 1996. A new methodological approach to bibliographic coupling and its application to the national, regional and institutional level. Scientometrics1996; 37(2): 195–221.
6.
HuangMHChiangLYChenDZ. Constructing a patent citation map using bibliographic coupling: A study of Taiwan’s high-tech companies. Scientometrics2003; 58(3): 489–506.
7.
JarnevingB. A comparison of two bibliometric methods for the mapping of the research front. Scientometrics2005; 65(2): 245–263.
8.
SmallH. Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science1973; 24(4): 265–269.
9.
WhiteHDMcCainKW. Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science1998; 49(4): 327–355.
10.
ChenC. Visualizing semantic spaces and author co-citation networks in digital libraries. Information Processing and Management1999; 35(3): 401–420.
11.
ÅströmF. Changes in the LIS research front: Time-sliced cocitation analyses of LIS journal articles, 1990–2004. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology2007; 58(7): 947–957.
12.
CallonM. From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information1983; 22: 191–235.
13.
CallonMLawJRipA (eds). Mapping the dynamics of science and technology: sociology of science in the real world. London: Macmillan Press, 1986.
14.
TodorovR. Displaying content of scientific journals: A co-heading analysis. Scientometrics1992; 23(2): 319–334.
15.
MacainKW. R&D themes in information science: A preliminary co-descriptor analysis. Proceedings of the 5th biennial conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics, Pine Forest, IL, 7–10 June 1995, pp. 275–282.
16.
ReidEChenH. Mapping the contemporary terrorism research domain: Researchers, publications, and institutions analysis. In: KantorPMuresanGRobertsFZengDWangF-YChenHMerkleR (eds), Intelligence and security informatics. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin: Springer, 2005, pp. 322–339.
17.
YoonBParkY. A text-mining-based patent network: Analytical tools for high-technology trend. Journal of High technology Management Research2004; 15: 37–50.
18.
KostoffRNBlockJA. Factor matrix text filtering and clustering. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology2005; 56(9): 946–968.
19.
TsengYHLinCJLinYI. Text mining techniques for patent analysis. Information Processing and Management2007; 43(5): 1216–1247.
20.
JacobsN. Co-term network analysis as a means of describing the information landscapes of knowledge communities across sectors. Journal of Documentation2002; 58(5): 548–562.
21.
KimPJLeeJY. Descriptor profiling for research domain analysis. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management2007; 24(4): 285–303.
22.
KimHJLeeJY. Archiving research trends in LIS domain using profiling analysis. Scientometrics2009; 80(1): 75–90.
23.
LeeJYKimHJKimPJ. Domain analysis with text mining: Analysis of digital library research trends using profiling methods. Journal of Information Science2010; 36(2): 144–161.
24.
ParkHWLeydesdorffL. Korean journals in Science Citation Index: What do they reveal about the intellectual structure of S & T in Korea. Scientometrics2008; 75(3): 439–462.
25.
SeolSSParkJM. Knowledge sources of innovation studies in Korea: A citation analysis. Scientometrics, 2008; 75(1): 3–20.
26.
ChungJCLeeSBarnettGAKimJH. A comparative network analysis of the Korean Society of Journalism and Communication Studies (KSJCS) and the International Communication Association (ICA) in the era of hybridization. Asian Journal of Communication2009; 19(2): 170–191.
27.
JeongSLeeSKKimHG. Knowledge structure of Korean medical informatics: A social network analysis of articles in journal and proceedings. Healthcare Informatics Research2010; 16(10): 52–59.
28.
LeeBJeongYI. Mapping Korea’s national R&D domain of robot technology by using the co-word analysis. Scientometrics2008; 77(1): 3–19.
29.
KimYSKoJNDoMS. An exploratory study on the study trend of domestic entrepreneurship using co-word analysis method. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management2011; 28(3): 295–312.
30.
WhiteHDGriffithBC. Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science1981; 32(3): 163–171.
31.
WhiteHD. Pathfinder networks and author cocitation analysis: A remapping of paradigmatic information scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology2003; 54(5): 423–434.
32.
McCainKW. Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science1990; 41, 433–443.
33.
LeeJY. A study on the network generation methods for examining the intellectual structure of knowledge domains. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science2006; 40(2): 333–355.
34.
LeeJY. Improving the performance of document clustering with distributional similarities. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management2007; 24(4): 267–283.
35.
HanSH. A study on keyword extraction from a single document using term clustering. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science2010; 44(3): 155–173.
36.
RipACourtialJP. Co-word maps of biotechnology: An example of cognitive scientometrics. Scientometrics1984; 15(6): 381–400.
37.
SeglenPOAksnesDW. Scientific productivity and group size: A bibliometric analysis of Norwegian microbiological research. Scientometrics2000; 49(1): 125–143.
38.
ChenHFullerSSFriedmanCHershW (eds). Medical informatics: Knowledge management and data mining in biomedicine. London: Springer, 2005.
39.
AnaniadouSMcNaughtJ (eds). Text mining for biology and biomedicine. Norwood, MA: Artech House, 2006.
40.
FattoriMPedrazziGTurraR. Text mining applied to patent mapping: A practical business cases. World Patent Information2003; 25(4): 335–342.
41.
KostoffRNEberhartHJToothmanDR. Database tomography for technical intelligence: A roadmap of the near-earth space science and technology literature. Information Processing and Management1998; 34(1): 69–85.
42.
KostoffRN. Citation mining: integrating text mining and bibliometrics for research user profiling. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology2001; 52(13): 1148–1156.
43.
McCainKW. The use of bibliometric and knowledge elicitation techniques to map a knowledge domain: Software engineering in the 1990s. Scientometrics2005; 65(1): 131–144.
44.
PerssonO. The intellectual base and research fronts of JASIS 1986–1990. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology1994; 45(1): 31–38.
45.
DingYChowdhuryGFooS. Journal as markers of intellectual space: Journal co-citation analysis of Information Retrieval area, 1987–1997. Scientometrics2000; 47(1): 55–73.
46.
McCainKW. Mapping economics through the journal literature: An experiment in journal cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science1991; 42(4): 290–296.
47.
SullivanD. Document warehousing and text mining: Techniques for improving business operations, marketing, and sales. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2001.
48.
MillerTW. Data and text mining: A business applications approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2004.
49.
LeeJY. A novel clustering method for examining and analyzing the intellectual structure of a scholarly field. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management2006; 23(4): 215–231.
