The purpose of this study was to assess the ways in which a sample group of companies discuss information and knowledge. Quantitative and qualitative content analyses were used to survey the way that companies present and value information and knowledge, based on the annual reports of the FTSE 100. A novel content analysis approach is used, based on a set of categories proposed by Oppenheim, Stenson and Wilson. Many of the companies analysed made explicit the importance of information and knowledge, through either discussion in the text of the annual report or through an attempt to assign a monetary value to information assets. Where the importance of information and knowledge was not made explicit, the study revealed links between successful performance and effective use of information assets. Different categories of information assets were identified within the annual reports. Information and knowledge are demonstrably important to FTSE 100 companies, although the specific term ‘knowledge’ does not appear to have a special significance in the companies’ lexicon; certain sectors mention information and knowledge more than others.
Capgemini, The Information opportunity report: Harnessing information to enhance business performance (2008). Available at: www.uk.capgemini.com/for_you_to_use/thought_leadership/the_information_opportunity_report_2008/ (accessed 28 October 2008).
2.
M.J. Huang , M.Y. Chen and K. Yieh, Comparing with your main competitor: the single most important task of knowledge management performance measurement , Journal of Information Science33(4) (2007) 416-434.
3.
J. Rowley and R. Hartley, Organizing Knowledge: an Introduction to Managing Access to Information (Ashgate, Aldershot, 2008).
4.
C. Oppenheim , J. Stenson, and R. Wilson, Studies on information as an asset I: definitions, Journal of Information Science29(3) (2003) 159-166.
5.
M. Sakalaki and S. Kazi, How much is information worth? Willingness to pay for expert and non-expert informational goods compared to material goods in lay economic thinking, Journal of Information Science33(3) ( 2007) 315-325.
6.
G. Holmes, A. Sugden and P. Gee, Interpreting Company Reports and Accounts (FT Prentice Hall, London, 2004).
7.
FTSE, FTSE 100 Index Factsheet (2008). Available at: www.ftse.com/Indices/UK_Indices/Downloads/FTSE_100_Index_Factsheet.pdf (accessed 28 October 2008).
8.
J.J. Eaton and D. Bawden, What kind of resource is information? International Journal of Information Management11(2) (1991) 156-165.
9.
T.H. Davenport and L. Prusak, Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA, 2000).
10.
P. Checkland and S. Holwell, Information , Systems and Information Systems: Making Sense of the Field (Wiley, Chichester , 1998).
11.
P. Yates-Mercer and D. Bawden, (2002) Managing the paradox: the valuation of knowledge and knowledge management, Journal of Information Science28(1) (2002) 19-29.
12.
C. Oppenheim , J. Stenson and R. Wilson, Studies on information as an asset II: repertory grid, Journal of Information Science29(5) (2003) 419-432.
13.
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, IAS Plus International Accounting Standards: IAS 38, Intangible Assets (2008). Available at: www.iasplus.com/standard/ias38.htm (accessed 1 June 2008).
14.
IASB (International Accounting Standards Board)Intangible Assets (2007). Available at: www.iasb.org/NR/rdonlyres/6A1793C3-81F3-4A62-B0D4-EC9BF7A5772F/0/IntangibleassetsprojectupdateDec07.pdf (accessed 1 June 2008).
15.
E. Orna, Information policies: yesterday, today, tomorrow, Journal of Information Science34(4) (2008) 547- 565.
16.
R.M.S. Wilson and J.A. Stenson, Valuation of information assets on the balance sheet: The recognition and approaches to the valuation of intangible assets, Business Information Review25(3) (2008) 167-182.
17.
A. Turner and A. Holmes, Mind your business language (Unpublished white paper, Young Samuel Chambers (YSC Limited), London, 2008).
18.
J. Cummins, Accounting for information: information and knowledge in the annual reports of FTSE 100 companies (Unpublished MSc dissertation, Centre for Information Science, City University, London, 2009).
19.
K. Krippendorff , Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology ( Sage, Newbury Park CA, 2003).
20.
J. Harris, Wordcount (2003). Available at: http://wordcount.org/about.html (accessed 28 October 2008).
21.
London Stock Exchange plc, Prices (2009). Available at: www.londonstockexchange.com/en-gb/pricesnews/prices/ (accessed 4 January 2009).
22.
D. Bawden and L. Robinson, Pharmaceutical information; a 30-year perspective on the literature, Annual Reviews of Information Science and Technology (2010) in press.
23.
Man Group plc, Annual Report 2008 (2008). Available at: www.mangroupplc.com/Investor/Annual%20Report/AnnualReport2008.pdf (accessed 8 December 2008).
24.
3i Group plc, General Industrial (2008). Available at: www.3i.com/sectors/general-industrial.html (accessed 22 November 2008).
25.
Shuaa Capital PSC, Petrofac Equity Research (2006). Available at: www.ameinfo.com/shuaa_pdf/EquityResearch/2006-07-14.pdf (accessed 22 November 2008).
26.
F. Bouthillier and K. Shearer, Understanding knowledge management and information management: the need for an empirical perspective, Information Research8(1) (2002) paper no. 141. Available at: http://informationr.net/ir/8-1/paper141.html (accessed 28 October 2008).
27.
M. Sakalaki and S. Kazi, Valuing and representing information: the paradox of undervaluing information and overvaluing information producers , Journal of Information Science35(2) (2009) 153-164.
