The IL-HUMASS survey on information literacy has been designed, based on and aimed to be applied to a population of students, teachers and librarians holding various degrees in social sciences and humanities at Spanish and Portuguese universities. The case-study method, experts’ opinions, and a literature review were used to prepare an initial version that was refined through student focus groups, interviews with librarians, and academics’ reports. A final version contained 26 items grouped into four categories (information search, assessment, processing and communication/dissemination) and three self-reporting dimensions (motivation, self-efficacy and favourite source of learning). The self-reporting nature of the IL-HUMASS survey involves a self-assessment approach that has until now been proposed rarely and only in a limited way. This will enable a better understanding of user groups through a mixed analysis including two quantitative dimensions (motivation and self-efficacy) and one qualitative dimension (the preferred source of learning).
G.J. Leckie and A. Fullerton, Information literacy in science and engineering undergraduate education: faculty attitudes and pedagogical practices , College & Research Libraries60(1) (1999) 9-29.
2.
C. Kuhlthau , Inside the search process: information seeking from the user’s perspective, Journal of the American Society for Information Science42(5) (1991) 361-71.
3.
D.P. Maughan , Assessing information literacy among undergraduates: a discussion of the literature and the University of California-Berkeley assessment experience, College & Research Libraries61(1) (2001) 71-85.
4.
S. Corrall , Benchmarking strategic engagement with information literacy in higher education: towards a working model, Information Research12(4) (2007) 328. Available at: http://Informationr.net/ir/12-4/paper328.html (accessed 22 July 2008).
5.
J. Sandberg , Understanding human competences at work: an interpretative approach, Academy of Management Journal43(1) (2000) 9-17.
6.
R. Barnett, Higher Education: A Critical Business (Open University Press, Buckingham, 1997).
7.
US Department of Labor, Employment & Training Administration, Knowledge Skill and Abilities. Available at: http://www.doleta.gov/jobs/Federal_Application_Process/Knowledge_Skills_Abilities/ (accessed 26 April 2009).
8.
B.S. Bloom and D.R. Krathwohl, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: the Classification of Educational Goals, by a Committee of College and University Examiners. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain (New York, Longmans, Green , 1956).
9.
J.V. Wertsch , Vygotsky and the Social Formation of Mind ( Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1985).
10.
R.V. Small , N. Zakaria and H. El-Figuigui, Motivational aspects of information literacy skills instruction in community college libraries, College & Research Libraries65(2) (2004) 96-121.
11.
C. McGuiness , What faculty think - exploring the barriers to information literacy development in undergraduate education, The Journal of Academic Librarianship32(6) (2006) 573-82.
12.
A. Bandura, Self-efficacy. In: V.S. Ramachaudran (ed.), Encyclopedia of Human Behaviour, 4 ( Academic Press, New York: 1994). (Reprinted in H. Friedman [ed.], Encyclopedia of Mental Health (Academic Press, San Diego , 1998) 71-81.
13.
S. Cassidy and P. Eachus, Developing the computer self-efficacy (CSE) scale: investigating the relationship between CSE, gender and experience with computers, Journal of Educational Computing Research26(2) (2002) 133-53.
14.
S.S. Kurbanoglu ; B. Akkoyunlu and A. Umay, Developing the information literacy self-efficacy scale, Journal of Documentation62(6) (2006) 730-43.
15.
F. Pajares, Overview of social cognitive theory and of self-efficacy. Available at: http://www.des.emory.edu/mfp/eff.html (accessed 24 July 2008).
16.
W.S. Brockman , L. Neumann, C.L. Palmer and T.J. Tidline, Scholarly Work in the Humanities and the Evolving Information Environment (Digital Library Federation, Council on Library and Information Resources, Washington DC, 2001).
17.
H.B. Rader, Information literacy 1973-2002: a selected literature review - Bibliography , Library Trends51(2) (2002) 141-3.
18.
C. Bruce, Seven Faces of Information Literacy (Auslib Press, Adelaide, 1997).
19.
S. Virkus .Information literacy in Europe: a literature review, Information Research8(4) (2003). Available at: http://InformationR.net/ir/8-4/paper159.html (accessed 12 September 2008).
20.
S. Webber and B. Johnston, Conceptions of information literacy: new perspectives and implications, Journal of Information Science26(6) (2000) 381-97.
21.
S. Webber and B. Johnston, Working towards the information literate university. In: G. Walton and A. Pope (eds), Information Literacy: Recognizing the Need, (Chandos, Oxford, 2006 ).
22.
M. Pinto , Cyberabstracts: a portal on the subject of abstracting designed to improve information literacy skills, Journal of Information Science34(5) (2008) 667-79.
23.
L. Limberg and O. Sundin, Teaching information seeking: relating information literacy education to theories of information behaviour, Information Research12(1) (2006) paper 280. Available at: http://InformationR.net/ir/12-1/paper280.html
24.
C. Maybe , Undergraduate perceptions of information use: the basis for creating user-centered student information literacy instruction , Journal of Academic Librarianship32(1) (2006) 79-85.
25.
M. Lupton , The getting of wisdom: reflections of a teaching librarian, Australian Academic and Research Libraries, 33(2) (2002).
26.
J. Kirk, Information literacy in an information studies undergraduate course. In: D. Booker (ed.), The Learning Link: Information Literacy in Practice (Auslib Press, Adelaide, 1995) 1-9.
27.
A. Lloyd , Information literacy landscapes: an emerging picture, Journal of Documentation62(5) (2006) 570-83.
28.
K. Tuominen , R. Savolainen and S. Talja, Information literacy as a sociotechnical practice, Library Quarterly75(3) (2005) 329-45.
29.
ACRL (Association of College Research Libraries), Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education (2000). Available at: http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlstandards/informationliteracycompetency.htm (accessed 22 July 2008).
30.
SCONUL (Society of College, National and University Libraries), Information Skills in Higher Education: A SCONUL Position Paper ( 1999). Available at: http://www.sconul.ac.uk/groups/information_literacy/seven_pillars.html (accessed 12 September 2008).
31.
A. Bundy (ed.), Australian and New Zealand Information Literacy Framework: Principles, Standards and Practices (2nd edn) (ANZII, Adelaide, 2004).
32.
A. Walsh , Information literacy assessment: Where do we start?, Journal of Librarianship and Information Science41(1) (2009) 19-28.
33.
D. Latham and M. Gross, Better than average: information literacy skill levels, self-estimates of performance and library anxiety (conference presentation at LOEX, San Diego, 2007).
34.
R. Catts, Information Skills Survey for Assessment of Information Literacy in Higher Education (CAUL, Canberra, 2003).
35.
ETS release ICT literacy standards for the iSkillsTM assessment . Available at: http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/Ets-825083.html (accessed 24 April 2009).
36.
T.P. Mackey and J. Ho , Implementing a convergent model for information literacy: combining research and web literacy, Journal of Information Science31(6) (2005) 541-55.
37.
D. Sales , Towards a student-centred approach to information literacy learning: A focus group study on the information behaviour of translation and interpreting students, Journal of Information Literacy2(1) ( 2008) 41-60. Available at: http://jil.lboro.ac.uk/ojs/index.php/JIL/article/view/RA-V2-I1-2008-3 (accessed 12 September 2008)
38.
M.D. Myers , Qualitative research in information systems , MIS Quarterly21(2) (1997) 241-2.
39.
R.K. Yin , Case Study Research: Design and Methods ( Sage, Newbury Park, CA, 1984).
40.
R. Stake, The Art of Case Research (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1995).
41.
A.L. George and A. Bennett.Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences ( MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2005).
42.
S.K. Soy , The case study as a research method (Unpublished manuscript, University of Texas at Austin, 1997 ). Available at: http://www.gslis.utexas.edu/~ssoy/usesusers/l391d1b.htm (accessed 12 September 2008).
43.
S. Andretta, Information Literacy: A Practitioner’s Guide (Chandos , Oxford, 2005).
44.
D. Bawden, Information and digital literacies: a review of concepts, Journal of Documentation57(2) (2001) 218-59.
45.
S. Behrens, A conceptual analysis and historical overview of information literacy, College and Research Libraries55 ( 1994) 309-322.
46.
C. Doyle, Information Literacy in an Information Society: A Concept for the Information Age (ERIC, Syracuse, NY, 1994).
47.
T.W. Goad, Information Literacy and Workplace Performance (Quorum Books, Westport, CT, 2002).
48.
E.S. Grassian and J.R. Kaplowitz, Information Literacy Instructs: Theory and Practice (Neal-Shuman, New York , 2001).
49.
M. Hepworth , Approaches to providing information literacy training in higher education: challenges for librarians, The New Review of Academic Librarianship6 ( 2000) 21-34.
50.
J. Kapoun , Teaching undergrads WEB evaluation: A guide for library instruction, C&RL News59(7) (1998) 522-3.
51.
M. Pinto and D. Sales, Knowledge transfer and information skills for student-centered learning in Spain, Portal: Libraries and the Academy8(1) (2008) 53-74.
52.
M. Pinto , A. Fernandez and A.V. Doucet, Measuring students’ information literacy skills through abstracting, College and Research Libraries69(2) (2008) 132-54.
53.
I.F. Rockman and G.W. Smith, Information and communication technology literacy: New assessments for higher education, C&RL News66(8) ( 2005) 587-9.
54.
B.J. Scales and E.B. Lindsay, Qualitative assessment of student attitudes toward information literacy, Portal: Libraries and the Academy5(4) ( 2005) 513-26.
55.
K.L. Spitzer , M.B. Eisenberg and C.A. Love, Information Literacy: Essential Skills for the Information Age (ERIC, Syracuse, NY, 1998),
56.
N.P. Thomas, Information Literacy and Information Skills Instruction : Applying Research to Practice in the School Library Media Center (Libraries Unlimited, Westport, CT, 1999).
57.
H.M. Thompson and S.A. Henley, Fostering Information Literacy.Connecting NationalStandards, Goals 2000, and the SCANS Report (Libraries Unlimited, Englewood, CO, 2000).
58.
Portal e-COMS. Available at: http://www.mariapinto.es/e-coms (accessed 12 September 2008). Portal Alfin-EEES. Available at: http://www.mariapinto.es/alfineees/AlfinEEES.htm (accessed 12 September 2008). Portal ALFAMEDIA. Available at: http://www.mariapinto.es/alfamedia/index.htm (accessed 12 September 2008). Portal IMATEC. Available at: http://www.mariapinto.es/imatec (accessed 12 September 2008).
59.
ALA (American Library Association), Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education (2004). Available at: http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlstandards/standards.pdf (accessed 18 June 2008).
60.
ACRL (Association of College Research Libraries), Analysis of Instructional Environments. ACRL Instruction Section (2007). Available at: http://www.library.uiuc.edu/training/aie/Analysis%20of%20Instructional%20Environments%20final%202.pdf (accessed 2 May 2008).
61.
ACRL (Association of College Research Libraries), Characteristics of Programs of Information Literacy that Illustrate Best Practices: A Guideline, ACRL’s Institute for Information Literacy (2003). Available at: http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlstandards/characteristics.htm (accessed 2 May 2008).
62.
ACRL (Association of College Research Libraries), Objectives for Information Literacy Instruction: A Model Statement for Academic Librarians (2001). Available at: http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlstandards/objectivesinformation.cfm (accessed 2 May 2008).
63.
CAUL (Council of Australian University Librarians), Information Literacy Standards (CAUL, Camberra, 2001).
64.
F.W. Horton, Understanding Information Literacy: A Primer (UNESCO, The Information Society Division, Communication and Information Sector, Paris, 2007).
65.
Aahe, Principles of Good Practice for Assessing Student Learning, AAHE Assessment Forum. Available at: http://ultibase.rmit.edu.au/Articles/june97/ameri1.htm#9 (accessed 12 September 2008).
66.
G.D. Kuh , Assessing what really matters to student learning: inside the National Survey of Student Engagement, Change33(3) (2001) 10-66.
67.
A.E. Mark and P.D. Boruff-Jones, Information literacy and student engagement: what the national survey of student engagement reveals about your campus, College and Research Libraries64(6) (2003) 480-93.
68.
Project SAILS: Standardized Assessment of Information Literacy Skills. Available at: http://www.projectsails.org (accessed 16 June 2008).
69.
C.J. Radcliff , J.A. Salem, L.G. O’Connor and J.A. Gedeon, Project SAILS Skill Sets for the 2007-2008 Academic Year (2007). Available at: http://www.projectsails.org/abouttest/samples.php (accessed 12 September 2008).
70.
ANECA (Agencia Nacional de Evaluación de la Calidad y Acreditación).Plan Nacional de Evaluación de la Calidad. Available at: http://www.aneca.es/ingles/homei.asp (accessed 9 May 2008).
71.
LibQUAL+, Charting Library Service Quality, Defining and promoting library service quality. Available at: http://www.libqual.org/About/Information/index.cfm (accessed 7 September 2008).
72.
D. Morgan, Focus Groups as Qualitative Research (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1997).
73.
D. Williams and C. Wavell, The Impact of the School Library Resource Centre on Learning. A Report on Research Conducted for Resource: The Council for Museums, Archives and Libraries (The Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, 2001).
74.
H. Morrison, Information literacy skills: an exploratory focus group study of student perceptions , Research Strategies15(1) (1997) 4-17.
