This study explores the extent to which `French theory' (Bourdieu, Derrida, Foucault et al.) has left its mark on the scholarly literature of information studies. A bibliometric analysis reveals which theorists (and which works) have been most highly cited over the course of the last four decades. The study also identifies the information studies journals and scholars who have been the most frequent citers of French theorists.
F. Cusset, French Theory: How Foucault, Derrida, Deluze & Co. Transformed the Intellectual Life of the United States, translated by J. Fort (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 2008).
2.
S. Fish, French Theory in America. Available at: http://fish.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/04/06/french-theory-in-america/ (accessed 6 April 2008).
3.
S. Lotringer and S. Cohen (eds), French Theory in America (Routledge , New York, 2001).
4.
J.P. Mathy, The resistance to French theory in the United States: a cross-cultural enquiry , French Historical Studies19(2) (1995) 331-347.
5.
J. Derrida, Deconstructions: the im-possible. In: S Lotringer and S. Cohen (eds), French Theory in America (Routledge, New York, 2001) 13-31.
6.
R. Wolin, America's tolerance for French radicalism, Chronicle of Higher Education (13 June 2008) B14-B15.
7.
A. Sokal and J. Bricmont, Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals' Abuse of Science (Picador, New York, 1997).
8.
R. Kohler, Moral economy, material culture, and community in Drosophila genetics. In: M. Biagioli (ed.), The Science Studies Reader (Routledge, London , 1999) 243-57.
9.
M. Lamont , How to become a dominant French philosopher: the case of Jacques Derrida, American Journal of Sociology3 (1987) 584-622.
10.
K.E. Pettigrew and L.E.F. McKechnie, The use of theory in information science research, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology52(1) (2001) 62-73.
11.
R.E. Day , Poststructuralism and information studies. In: B. Cronin (ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology39 (2005) 575-609.
12.
A.K. Pyati , Critical theory and information studies: a Marcusean infusion, Policy Futures in Education4(1) (2006) 83-89.
13.
B. Cronin , The sociological turn in information science , Journal of Information Science34(4) (2008) 465-475.
14.
H.F. Moed, Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (Springer, Dordrecht, 2005).
15.
M. Biagioli, From difference to blackboxing: French theory versus science studies' metaphysics of presence. In: S. Lotringer and S. Cohen (eds), French Theory in America (Routledge, New York, 2001) 271-287.
16.
B. Cronin and L.I. Meho, The shifting balance of intellectual trade in information studies, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology59(4) (2008) 551-564.
17.
S. Talja , K. Tuominen and R. Savolainen, `Isms' in information science, Journal of Documentation61(1) (2005) 79-101.
18.
J. Buschman , Transgression or stasis? Challenging Foucault in LIS theory, Library Quarterly77(1) (2007) 21-44.
19.
R. Kling, Critical Professional Education about Information and Communication Technologies . Available at: http://rkcsi.indiana.edu/archive/CSI/WP/WP02-06B.html (accessed 17 August 2008).
