This paper explores the connections between two historical lines of research: social informatics in the United States, and sociotechnical studies in the United Kingdom. The author discusses samples of work from three long established UK research sites, at Manchester, Edinburgh and the London School of Economics, to give the reader a sense of sociotechnical work at different historical periods. Though the US and UK traditions share a common interest in the production of technology, and work with complementary concepts and methods, formal links between the two have not been strong for much of the historical period under review. However, there are signs of fusion in the work of a current generation of researchers on both sides of the Atlantic.
K. Horton , E. Davenport and T.W. Wood-Harper, Exploring sociotechnical interaction with Rob Kling: five `big' ideas, Information, Technology and People18(1) (2005) 50-67.
2.
R. Kling and W. Scacchi, The web of computing, Computing technology and social organization, Advances in Computers21 (1982) 3-90.
3.
R. Kling, Defining the boundaries of computing across complex organizations. In: R. Boland and R. Hirschheim (eds), Critical Issues in Information Systems (John Wiley, New York, 1987) 307-362.
4.
R. Kling, What is social informatics and why does it matter?DLIB Magazine5(1) ( 1999). Available at: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january99/kling/01kling.html (accessed 6 January 2008). Reprinted in The Information Society23 (2007) 205-220.
5.
R. Day , Kling and the `critical': social informatics and critical informatics, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology58(4) (2007) 575-582.
6.
B. Wellman and R. Hiltz, Sociological Rob: how Rob Kling brought computing and sociology together, The Information Society20 (2004) 91-95.
7.
S. Sawyer and K. Eschenfelder, Social informatics: perspectives, examples and trends. In B. Cronin (ed.), Annual Review of Science and Technology36, (Information Today, Medford, NJ, 2002) 427-425.
8.
S. Sawyer and A. Tapia, From findings to theories: institutionalising social informatics, The Information Society23 (2007) 263-275.
9.
R. Hirschheim , in: D. Avison, N. Bjørn-Andersen, E. Coakes, G.B. Davis, M.J. Earl, A. Elbanna, G. Fitzgerald, R.D. Galliers, R. Hirschheim, J. Iivari, H.K. Klein, F. Land, M. de Marco, A.M. Pettigrew, J. Porra, B.C. Stahl, C. Sørensen, B. Wood and T. Wood-Harper, Enid Mumford: a tribute, Information Systems Journal16(4) (2006) 343-382.
10.
T. Gieryn , City as truth spot, Social Studies of Science36(1) (2006) 5-38.
11.
E. Mumford and O. Banks, The Computer and the Clerk (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1967).
12.
E. Mumford, Living with a Computer (Institute of Personnel Management , London, 1964).
13.
E. Mumford and M. Weir, Computer Systems in Work Design - the ETHICS Method (Associated Business Press, London, 1979).
14.
E. Mumford, Managerial expert systems and organizational change: some critical research issues. In R.J. Boland and R.A. Hirschheim (Eds), Critical Issues in Information Systems Research (John Wiley, New York, 1987) 135-155.
15.
D.E. Avison and A.T. WoodHarper, Multiview - an exploration in information systems development, Australian Computer Journal18(4) (1986) 174-179.
16.
R. Singh , B. Wood and T. Wood-Harper, Socio-technical design of the 21st century. In: T. McMaster, D. Wastell, E. Ferneley and J.I. DeGross (eds), Organizational Dynamics of Technology-based Innovation: Diversifying the Research Agenda (International Federation for Information Processing, Vol. 235, Springer, Berlin, 2007) 503-406.
17.
T.D. Wilson, Professor Tom Wilson - a (mainly) professional biography. Available at: http://informationr.net/tdw/biog.html (accessed 19 December 2007).
18.
D. Avison, N. Bjørn-Andersen, E. Coakes, G.B. Davis, M.J. Earl, A. Elbanna, G. Fitzgerald, R.D. Galliers, R. Hirschheim, J. Iivari, H.K. Klein, F. Land, M. de Marco, A.M. Pettigrew, J. Porra, B.C. Stahl, C. Sørensen, B. Wood and T. Wood-Harper, Enid Mumford: a tribute, Information Systems Journal16 (2006) 343-382.
19.
E. Mumford, The story of socio-technical design: reflection on its successes, failures, and potential, Information Systems Journal16(4) (2006) 317-342.
20.
D. Mackenzie , B. Barnes, S. Jasanoff and M. Lynch, Life's work, love's work. Four tributes to David Edge (1932-2003), EASST Review22(1/2) ( 2003).
21.
D. Bloor, Knowledge and Social Imagery (Routledge, London, 1976).
22.
T. Pinch and W. Bijker, The social construction of facts and artefacts: or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other, Social Studies of Science14(3) (1984) 399-441.
23.
L. Winner , Upon opening the black box and finding it empty: social constructivism and the philosophy of technology, Science Technology & Human Values18(3) (1993) 362-378.
24.
R. Mansell and E. Steinmuller, Mobilizing the Information Society, Strategies for Growth and Opportunity (Oxford University Press, Oxford , UK, 2000).
25.
W. Dutton , The web of technology and people: challenges for economic and social research, Prometheus17(1) (1999) 5-20.
26.
R. Williams and D. Edge, The social shaping of technology, Research Policy25 (1996) 865-899.
27.
S. Russell and R. Williams, Social shaping of technology: frameworks, findings and implications for policy with Glossary of social shaping concepts. In K. Sorensen and R. Williams (eds), Shaping Technology, Guiding Policy (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, 2002) 37-131.
28.
J. Fleck and J. Howells, Technology, the technology complex and the paradox of technological determinism, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management13(4) (2001) 523-532.
29.
J. Fleck , Innofusion or Diffusation? The Nature of Technological Development in Robotics (Edinburgh PICT Working Paper No. 7, Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, UK, 1988).
30.
J. Fleck , Learning by trying: the implementation of configurational technology, Research Policy23 (1994) 637-652.
31.
R. Williams , Public choices and social learning; the new multimedia technologies in Europe, The Information Society16 (2000) 251-262.
32.
N. Pollock, The promise organisation and the market for ICT (Presented at the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK, 14 December 2007).
33.
N. Thrift, Knowing Capitalism (Sage, London , 2005).
34.
K. Vann and G. Bowker, Interest in production: on the configuration of technology-bearing labours for epistemic IT. In C. Hine (ed.), New Infrastructures for Knowledge Production: Understanding E-Science (InformationScience Publishing, London, 2006) 71-79.
35.
R. Williams, The social shaping of information and communications technologies. In: H.Kubicek, W. Dutton and R. Williams (eds), The Social Shaping of Information Superhighways: European and American Roads to the Information Society (St Martin's Press, New York, 1997) 299-338.
36.
B. Kahin and D. Foray (eds), Advancing Knowledge in the Knowledge Economy (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2006).
37.
E. Davenport , Minding the Galison gap, The Information Society (in press).
38.
F. Land, A historical analysis of implementing IS at J. Lyons. In: W. Currie and R. Galliers (eds), Rethinking Management Information Systems (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1999) 310-325.
39.
W. Currie and R. Galliers (eds), Rethinking Management Information Systems (Oxford University Press, Oxford , UK, 1999).
40.
C. Avgerou, C. Ciborra and F. Land, The Social Study of IT (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2004).
41.
B. Stahl , The obituary as bricolage: the Mann Gulch disaster and the problem of heroic rationality, European Journal of Information Systems14 (2005) 487-491.
42.
C. Ciborra, The Labyrinths of Information: Challenging the Wisdom of Systems ( Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2002).
43.
S. Zuboff , Ciborra disclosed: aletheia in the life and scholarship of Claudio Ciborra, European Journal of Information Systems14 (2005) 470-473.
44.
E. Whitley , Understanding participation in entrepreneurial organizations: some hermeneutic readings, Journal of Information Technology14 (1999) 193-202.
45.
B. Latour, On using ANT for studying information systems: a (somewhat) Socratic dialogue . In: C. Avgerou, C. Ciborra and F. Land (eds), The Social Study of Information and Communication Technology ( Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2004) 61-76.
46.
A. Micakova and E. Whitley, Configuring peer-to-peer software: an empirical study of how users react to the regulatory features of software, European Journal of Information Systems13 (2006) 95-102.
47.
E. Whitley and M. Darking, Object lessons and invisible technologies, Journal of Information Technology21 (2006) 176-184.
48.
C. Ciborra, Digital Technologies and the Duality of Risk (CARR, the London School of Economics, London, UK, 2004).
49.
B. Flyvberg, N. Bruzelius and W. Rothengatter , Megaprojects and Risk: an Anatomy of Ambition (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge , UK, 2003).
50.
C. Sauer and L. Willcocks, Unreasonable expectations - NHS IT, Greek choruses and the games institutions play around mega-programmes, Journal of Information Technology22 (2007) 195-201.
51.
P. Dunleavy, H. Margetta, S. Bastow and J. Tinkler, Digital Era Governance: IT Corporations, the State and E-Government (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2006).
52.
E. Whitley , I.R. Hosein, I. Angell and S. Davies, Reflections on the academic policy analysis process and the UK identity cards scheme, The Information Society23 (2007) 51-58.
53.
E. Whitley and I. Hosein, Departmental Influences on Policy Design: how the UK is Confusing Identity Fraud with Other Policy Agendas ( Department of Management, Information Systems Group, Working Paper Series160, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK, 2007).
54.
E. Whitley and I. Hosein, Policy Engagement as Rigorous and Relevant Information Systems Research: the Case of the LSE Identity Project (Department of Management, Information Systems Group, Working Paper Series159, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK, 2007).
55.
J. Kallinikos , Farewell to constructivism: technology and context-embedded action. In: C. Avgerou, C. Ciborra and F. Land (eds), The Social Study of Information and Communication Technology (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2004) 140-161.
56.
B. Cronin , Journal of Information Science34(4) (2008) in press.
57.
B. Cronin and D. Shaw, Peers and spheres of influence: situating Rob Kling, The Information Society23 (2007) 221-234.
