This paper explores the history of `the social' in information science. It traces the influence of social scientific thinking on the development of the field's intellectual base. The continuing appropriation of both theoretical and methodological insights from domains such as social studies of science, science and technology studies, and socio-technical systems is discussed.
B. Cronin , Some reflections on citation habits in psychology , Journal of Information Science2(6) (1980) 309-11.
2.
A.J. Meadows , Communication in Science ( Butterworths, Seven Oaks, 1974).
3.
B. Cronin, The Citation Process: the Role and Significance of Citations in Scientific Communication (Taylor Graham, London , 1984).
4.
B. Cronin, The Hand of Science: Academic Writing and Its Rewards ( Scarecrow Press, Lanham, MD, 2005 ).
5.
B. Cronin and L.I. Meho, The Shifting Balance of Intellectual Trade in Information Studies, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology59(4) 551-64.
6.
I.S. Farkas-Conn , From Documentation to Information Science: the Beginnings and Early Development of the American Documentation Institute - American Society for Information Science (Greenwood Press , Westport, CO, 1990).
7.
J. Warner , W(h)ither information science?/!Library Quarterly, 71(2) (2001) 243-55.
8.
G. Wersig, Information science and theory: a weaver bird's perspective. In: P. Vakkari and B. Cronin (eds), Conceptions of Library and Information Science: Historical, Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives ( Taylor Graham, London, 1992) 201-17.
9.
P. Butler, An Introduction to Library Science (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1933).
10.
B. Cronin , Pierce Butler's An Introduction to Library Science: a tract for our times? Journal of Librarianship and Information Science36(4) (2004) 183-8.
11.
M. Egan and J. Shera, Foundations of a theory of bibliography, Library Quarterly22(2) ( 1952) 125-37.
12.
J. Furner , `A brilliant mind': Margaret Egan and social epistemology, Library Trends52(4) (2004) 792-809.
13.
D. Fallis , Social epistemology and information science , Annual Review of Information Science and Technology40 (2006) 475-519.
14.
N. Roberts , Social considerations towards a definition of information science, Journal of Documentation32(4) (1976) 249-57.
15.
T.D. Wilson , Sociological aspects of information science , International Forum on Information and Documentation6(2) (1981) 13-18. Available at: http://informationr.net/tdw/publ/papers/socasp81.html (accessed 11 August 2007).
16.
R. Kling , What is social informatics and why does it matter?D-Lib Magazine5(1) (1999). Available at: www.dlib.org:80/dlib/january99/kling/01kling.html (accessed 11 August 2007).
17.
A. Robbin and R. Day, On Rob Kling: the Theoretical, the Methodological, and the Critical (2006). Available at: https://scholarworks.iu.edu/dspace/bitstream/2022/183/1/Robbin-Day.pdf (accessed 11 August 2007).
18.
D. Bell, The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: a Venture in Social Forecasting (Basic Books, New York, 1999).
19.
M. Castells , The Rise of the Network Society2nd edn (Blackwell, Oxford, 2000 ).
20.
F. Webster, Theories of the Information Society2nd edn (Routledge, London, 2002).
21.
E. Mumford, Systems Design: Ethical Tools for Ethical Change (Macmillan, London, 1996).
22.
C.L. Borgman and R.E. Rice, The convergence of information science and communication: a bibliometric analysis, Journal of the American Society for Information Science43(6) (1992) 397-411.
23.
P.G.W. Keen , MIS research: reference disciplines and a cumulative tradition. In: E.R. McLean (ed.), First International Conference on Information Systems (AIS, Philadelphia, 1980) 9-18.
24.
A. Lockett and A. Williams, The balance of trade between disciplines: do we effectively manage knowledge ? Journal of Management Inquiry14(2) (2005) 139-50.
25.
S. Miyamoto , N. Midorikawa and K. Nakayama, A view on studies on bibliometrics and related studies in Japan. In: C.L. Borgman (ed.), Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics (Sage, Newbury Park, CA, 1990) 73-83.
26.
L. Wittgenstein , Philosophical Investigations [translated by G.E.M. Anscombe] (Prentice Hall, London, 1999).
27.
J.L. Austin , How to Do Things with Words ( Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1975).
28.
G. Ryle, The Concept of Mind (Hutchinson, London, 1949).
29.
B. Russell, Mysticism and Logic (Routledge, London, 1949).
30.
E. Gellner, Words and Things (Pelican, London , 1968).
31.
J. Knowlson and E. Knowlson (eds), Beckett Remembering, Remembering Beckett: a Centenary Celebration (Arcade, New York, 2006).
32.
R. Barthes , The death of the author, Aspen5/6 ( 1967). Available at: www.ubu.com/aspen/aspen5and6/threeEssays.html#barthes (accessed 11 August 2007).
33.
A. Kernan, In Plato's Cave (Yale University Press, New Haven, 1999).
34.
H. Bloom, The Western Canon: the Books and School of the Ages ( Harcourt Brace, New York, 1994).
35.
G.P. Radford , Positivism, Foucault, and the fantasia of the library: conceptions of knowledge and the modern library experience, Library Quarterly62(4) (1992) 408-24.
36.
R.E. Day , Poststructuralism and information studies, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology39 (2005) 575-609.
37.
B. McConachie , Doing things with image schemas: the cognitive turn in theater studies and the problem of experience for historians, Theatre Journal53(4) (2001) 569-94.
38.
R. Kimball, The Rape of the Masters: How Political Correctness Sabotages Art ( Encounter, New York, 2004).
39.
I. Cornelius , Theorizing information for information science , Annual Review of Information Science and Technology36 (2002) 393-425.
40.
G. Stigler , The economics of information, Journal of Political Economy69(3) (1961) 213-25.
41.
B.A. Nardi , Coda and Response to Christine Halverson, Computer Supported Cooperative Work11 (2002) 269-75.
42.
L. Menand , Dangers within and without, Profession8 (2005) 10-17.
43.
T. Eagleton , After Theory (Basic Books , New York , 2005).
44.
F. Fukuyama , The end of history?National Interest16(Summer) (1989) 3-18.
45.
Z. Leader, The Life of Kingsley Amis (Pantheon Books, New York, 2006).
46.
K.E. Fisher, S. Erdelez and E.F. McKechnie (eds), Theories of Information Behavior (Information Today, Medford, NJ, 2005).
47.
S. Talja , K. Tuominen, and R. Savolainen, `Isms' in information science: constructivism, collectivism and constructionism, Journal of Documentation61(1) ( 2005) 79-101.
48.
H. Rosenbaum , The death of the user. In: Proceedings of the 66th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science (Information Today, Medford, NJ, 2003). Presentation available at: www.slis.indiana.edu/hrosenba/www./Pres/asist_03/index.htm (accessed 11th August 2007).
49.
G. Downey , Human geography and information studies, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology41 (2007) 683-727.
50.
B. Cronin, Warm bodies, cold facts: the embodiment and emplacement of knowledge claims . In: P. Ingwersen and B. Larsen (eds), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics (Karolinska University Press, Stockholm , 2005) 1-12.
51.
P. Turner and E. Davenport (eds), Spaces, Spatiality and Technology (Springer, Dordrecht, 2005).
52.
J. Raper , J. Dykes, J. Wood, D. Mountain, A. Krause and D. Rhind, A framework for evaluating geographical information, Journal of Information Science28(1) (2002) 39-50.
53.
R. Skare, N.W. Lund and A. Våerheim (eds), A Document (Re)Turn: Contributions from a Research Field in Transition (Peter Lang, Frankfurt, 2007).
54.
C.W. Cleverdon , J. Mills and E.M. Keen, Factors Determining the Performance of Indexing Systems (Aslib Cranfield Research Project, College of Aeronautics , Cranfield, 1966) [Volume 1: Design; Volume 2: Results].
55.
D.K. Harman and E.M. Voorhees, TREC: an overview, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology40 (2006) 113-55.
56.
S. Robertson , Salton Award lecture: on theoretical argument in information retrieval, ACM SIGIR Forum34(1) (2000) 1-10.
57.
D. Ellis, Paradigms and proto-paradigms in information retrieval research. In: P. Vakkari and B. Cronin (eds), Conceptions of Library and Information Science: Historical, Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives ( Taylor Graham, London, 1992) 165-86.
58.
K. Järvelin , An analysis of two approaches to information retrieval: from frameworks to study designs. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology58(7) (2007) 971-86.
59.
F. Åstrom, Changes in LIS research front: time-sliced cocitation analysis of LIS journal articles, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology58(7) (2007) 947-57.
60.
N. Belkin, Anomalous states of knowledge as a basis for information retrieval , Canadian Journal of Information Science5(May) (1980), 133-43.
61.
P. Ingwersen and K. Järvelin, The Turn: Integration of Information Seeking and Retrieval in Context (Springer, Dordrecht, 2005).
62.
B. Hjorland , Information Seeking and Subject Representation: an Activity-Theoretical Approach to Information Science ( Greenwood Press, Westport, CT, 1997).
63.
H.D. White and K.W. McCain , Visualizing a discipline: an author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-95, Journal of the American Society for Information Science49(4) 327-55.
64.
E. Hutchins , Cognition in the Wild ( MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1995).
65.
E. von Hippel , Democratizing innovation: the evolving phenomenon of user innovation. In: B. Kahin and D. Foray (eds), Advancing Knowledge and the Knowledge Economy (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2006) 237-55.
66.
B.C. Brookes , Bradford's law and the bibliography of science , Nature224 ( 1969 ) 953-6.
67.
D.J. de SollaPrice, Citation measures of hard science, soft science, technology, and nonscience. In: C.E. Nelson and D.K. Pollock (eds), Communication Among Scientists and Engineers ( Heath Lexington , Massachusetts, 1970) 3-22.
68.
P. Mählck and O. Persson, Socio-bibliometric mapping of intra-departmental networks, Scientometrics49(1) (2000) 81-91.
69.
A. Zuccala , Modeling the invisible college, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology57(2) (2006) 152-68.
70.
N. van House , Science and technology studies and information studies, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology38 (2004) 3-86.
71.
Frohmann, B. , Deflating Information: from Science Studies to Documentation ( Toronto University Press, Toronto, 2004).
72.
C.L. Palmer and M.H. Cragin, Scholarship and disciplinary practices , Annual Review of Information Science and Technology , 43 (2008) (165-212).
73.
T.D. Wilson , Activity theory and information seeking, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology43 (2008) (in press).
74.
B. Nardi, Activity theory and human-computer interaction. In: B. Nardi (ed.), Context and Consciousness: Activity theory and Human-Computer Interaction (MIT Press , Cambridge, MA, 1996) 8-16.
75.
W.D. Garvey and B.C. Griffith, Communication and information processing within scientific disciplines: empirical findings for psychology , Information Storage and Retrieval8(3) (1972) 123-36.
76.
H.-J. Rheinberger , `Discourses of circumstance': a note on the author in science. In: M. Biagioli and P. Gallison (eds), Scientific Authorship: Credit and Intellectual Property in Science ( Routledge, New York, 2003) 309-23.
77.
R.K. Merton , The normative structure of science. In: R.K. Merton, The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations ( University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1973) 267-278. [Edited and with an introduction by N.W. Storer]
78.
H.F. Moed, Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (Springer , Dordrecht, 2005).
79.
H.D. White, Author co-citation analysis: overview and defense. In: C.L. Borgman (ed.), Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics (Sage, Newbury Park, CA, 1990) 84-106.
80.
H. Rosenbaum and I. Kouper, Borrowing from Sociology: a Study of the Importation of Theory into Information Science (forthcoming).
