The ability to abstract information is a basic competency in today's knowledge society, characterized by the mass diffusion of information and the need to manage and access it effectively. Yet abstracting is not an easy task, and requires a specific learning process. This paper examines the process of abstracting information from the perspective of competencies and skills-based learning of students of information and documentation. The competencies and skills necessary in this process, which are drawn from European sources on library science and documentation, are identified by analysing in detail the various stages and processes involved in writing an abstract. The general skills required for the whole process, as well as the specific skills for each stage, are determined. Guidelines and recommendations are put forward to facilitate the learning of these skills in the context of abstracting.
C. Mouraby , Apprendre à transmettre: un nouvel élément de l'identité du bibliothécaire, Bulletin Bibliothèques de France50(6) ( 2005) 80-89.
2.
C.S. Bruce, Information Literacy as a Catalyst for Educational Change: a Background Paper. White Paper prepared for UNESCO, the US National Commission on Libraries and Information Science, and the National Forum on Information Literacy, for use at the Information Literacy Meeting of Experts, Prague, The Czech Republic (2002 ). Available at: www.nclis.gov/libinter/infolitconf&meet/papers/bruce-fullpaper.pdf (accessed 16 October 2007).
3.
S. Andretta, Information Literacy: a Practitioner's Guide (Chandos, Oxford, 2005).
4.
J. Elmborg , Critical information literacy: implications for instructional practice, Journal of Academic Librarianship32(2) ( 2006) 192-9.
5.
A. Lloyd, Information literacy landscapes: an emerging picture, Journal of Documentation62(5) (2006) 570-83.
6.
C. Gibson (ed.), Student Engagement and Information Literacy (Association of College and Research Libraries, American Library Association, Chicago, 2006).
7.
S. Webber and B. Johnston, Information Literacy: Definitions and Models (2003). Available at: http://dis.shef.ac.uk/literacy/definitions.htm (accessed 16 October 2007).
8.
Association of College and Research Libraries , Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education (ACRL, Chicago, 2000). Available at: www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlstandards/standards.pdf (accessed 16 October 2007).
9.
American Association of School Librarians and Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Information Literacy Standards for Student Learning: Standards and Indicators (1996). Available at: http://slisweb.sjsu.edu/courses/250.loertscher/modelaasl.html (accessed 16 October 2007).
10.
Sconul, Information Skills in Higher Education: a SCONUL Position Paper (Society of College, National and University Libraries, London , 1999). Available at: www.sconul.ac.uk/groups/information_literacy/papers/Seven_pillars2.pdf (accessed 16 October 2007).
11.
A. Bundy (ed.), Australian and New Zealand Information Literacy Framework: Principles, Standards and Practice, 2nd Edition (Australian and New Zealand Institute for Information Literacy, Adelaide, 2004). Available at: www.caul.edu.au/info-literacy/InfoLiteracyFramework.pdf (accessed 16 October 2007).
12.
M. Pinto, El resumen documental: paradigmas, modelos y método (Fundación Germán Sánchez Ruipérez, Madrid, 2001).
13.
J. Hartley and M. Benjamin, An evaluation of structured abstracts in journals published by the British Psychological Society, British Journal of Educational Psychology68(3) ( 1998) 443-56.
14.
M. Pinto, M. Mitre, A.V. Doucet and M.J. Sanchez, Aprendiendo a resumir: prontuario y resolución de casos ( Trea, Gijón, 2005).
15.
F.W. Lancaster , Indexing and Abstracting in Theory and Practice (Facet Publishing, London, 2003).
16.
H. Borko and M. Bernier, Abstracting Concepts and Methods (Academic Press, New York, 1975).
17.
E.T. Cremmins , The Art of Abstracting ( ISI Press, Philadelphia, 1982).
18.
J. Hutchins, Summarization: some problems and methods. In: K. Jones (ed.) Meaning: the Frontier of Informatics, (Aslib, London, 1997) 151-73. [Informatics, Volume 9]
19.
M. Pinto , Documentary abstracting: toward a methodological model, Journal of the American Society for Information Science46(3) ( 1995) 225-34.
20.
I. Monday , Les processus cognitifs et la rédaction de résumés , Documentation et Bibliothèques42(2) (1996) 55-63.
21.
S. Waller, L'analyse documentaire: une approche méthodologique (ADBS , Paris, 1999).
22.
D.B. Cleveland and A.D. Cleveland, Introduction to Indexing and Abstracting (Libraries Unlimited, Englewood, CO, 1990).
23.
M.W. Aulls, Development and Remedial Reading in the Middle Grades ( Allyn & Bacon, Boston, 1978).
24.
A.J. Harris and E.R. Sipa, How to Increase Reading Ability: a Guide to Developmental and Remedial Methods (Longman, New York, 1980).
25.
P.N. Winograd , Strategic difficulties in summarizing texts , Reading Research Quarterly19(4) (1984) 404-25.
26.
R. Petitjean , La transformation de texte ( Cedic, Paris, 1984).
27.
W. Kintsch and T.A. VanDijk, Toward a model of text comprehension and production, Psychological Review, 85(5) (1978) 363-94.
28.
D. Armogathe , La synthèse de documents ( Bordas, Paris, 1998).
29.
Oecd, The Definition and Selection of Key Competencies: Executive Summary (2005). Available at: https://www.pisa.oecd.org/dataoecd/47/61/35070367.pdf (accessed 16 October 2007).
30.
C. Denecker, Les compétences documentaires: des processus mentaux à l'utilisation de l'information (Presses de l'ENSSIB, Villeurbanne , 2003).
31.
Agencia Nacional de Evaluación de la Calidad y Acreditación, Libro blanco: título de grado en información y documentación (ANECA, Madrid, 2004). Available at: www.aneca.es/activin/docs/libroblanco_jun05_documentacion.pdf (accessed 16 October 2007).
32.
Relación de eurocompetencias en información y documentación (SEDIC, Madrid, 2000).
33.
M. Pinto, Portal Alfin-EEES (2006). Available at: www.mariapinto.es/alfineees (accessed 16 October 2007).
34.
M. Pinto , A. Fernández-Ramos and A.V. Doucet, Measuring students' information literacy skills through abstracting: a case study from a library and information science perspective, College and Research Libraries69(2) (forthcoming).
35.
M. Pinto , Cyberabstracts: a portal on the subject of abstracting designed to improve information literacy skills, Journal of Information Science (forthcoming).
36.
G. Cotentin-Rey , Le résumé (Editions Clé International , Paris, 1992).
37.
N. Wormeli, Summarization in Any Subject: 50 Techniques to Improve Student Learning (Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, VA, 2004).
38.
H.D. Lasswell , Estructura y función de la comunicación en la sociedad. In: M. de Moragas (ed.), Sociología de la comunicación de masas, II, estructura, funciones y efectos (Gustavo Pili, Barcelona, 1985).
39.
E.L. Thomas and H.A. Robinson, Duplicator Master for Improving Reading in Every Class ( Allyn & Bacon, Boston, 1979).
40.
J.D. Novack, Learning, Creating, and Using Knowledge : Concept Maps as Facilitative Tools for Schools and Corporations (Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 1998).
41.
J. Elliott, Action Research for Educational Change (Open University Press, Buckingham, 1991).
