In this article, theories of human judgement and decision making are reviewed and their use by library and information science researchers examined. A different perspective on judgement and decision making is offered by the field of naturalistic decision making (NDM) and the implications of this approach are considered for an expanded understanding of how judgements and decisions are made during information seeking. This discussion is illustrated by a case from a recent empirical investigation into how judgements of enough information are made in the workplace. The article concludes with a critical evaluation of the NDM approach. It is argued that NDM, a recent development in decision theory, offers a new perspective from which to investigate judgements and decisions during information seeking.
E.F. Harrison , The Managerial Decision-Making Process (5th edition) (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA,1999).
2.
L. Zach, When is `enough' enough? Modeling the information-seeking and stopping behaviour of senior arts administrators, Journal of the American Society for Information Science56(1) (2005) 23—35.
3.
J.M. Berryman , What defines `enough' information? How policy workers make judgements and decisions during information seeking: preliminary results from an exploratory study, Information Research11(4) (2006) Paper 266. Available at http://InformationR.net/ir/11—4/paper266.html (accessed 13 March 2007).
4.
C.C. Kuhlthau , Seeking Meaning: a Process Approach to Library and Information Services (2nd edition) ( Libraries Unlimited, Westport, CT, 2004).
5.
D. Hardman and L. Macchi (eds), Thinking: Psychological Perspectives on Reasoning, Judgment and Decision Making (Wiley, Chichester, 2003).
6.
D.E. Agosto, Sound, colour and action: bounded rationality and satisficing in young people's examination of world wide web resources (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick , 2001).
7.
H. Jungermann , The two camps on rationality. In: T. Connolly et al. (eds), Judgment and Decision Making: an Interdisciplinary Reader (2nd edition) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge , 2000) 575—91.
8.
M. Browne, Organizational Decision Making and Information (Ablex, Norwood, NJ, 1993).
J. Kerstholt and P. Ayton, Should NDM change our understanding of decision making?, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making14(5) (2001) 370—71.
11.
P.B. Kantor , A model for the stopping behaviour of users of online systems, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology38(3) (1987) 211—14.
12.
J.G. March, A Primer on Decision Making: How Decisions Happen (Free Press, New York, 1994).
13.
T. Tyszka, Information and evaluation processes in decision making. In: N. Eisenberg et al. (eds), Social and Moral Values (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1989) 175—93.
14.
C.W. Choo, The Knowing Organization: How Organizations Use Information to Construct Meaning, Create Knowledge, and Make Decisions (Oxford University Press, New York, 1998).
15.
B.A. Mellers , A. Schwartz and A.D.J. Cooke, Judgment and decision making, Annual Review of Psychology49(1) (1998) 447—77.
16.
B.R. Newell, Re-visions of rationality? Trends in Cognitive Science9(1) (2005) 11—15.
H.A. Simon, A behavioural model of rational choice, Quarterly Journal of Economics69(1) (1955) 99—118.
19.
H.A. Simon, On the concept of organizational goal, Administrative Science Quarterly9(1) (1964) 1—23.
20.
H.A. Simon, Models of Thought (Yale University Press, New Haven, 1979).
21.
G. Marchionini , Information Seeking in Electronic Environments (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge /New York, 1995).
22.
D.H. Kraft and W.G. Waller, A Bayesian approach to user stopping rules for information retrieval systems , Information Processing and Management17(6) (1981) 349—60.
23.
D.R. Morehead and W.B. Rouse, Models of human behavior in information seeking tasks, Information Processing and Management18(4) (1982) 193—205.
24.
A. Tversky and D. Kahneman, Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. In: T. Connolly et al. (eds), Judgment and Decision Making: an Interdisciplinary Reader (2nd edition) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000) 35—52.
25.
P.M. Todd and G. Gigerenzer, Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart (1999). Available at www.abc.mpibberlin.mpg.de/users/ptodd/SimpleHeuristics.BBS/ (accessed 14 October 2003).
26.
D.E. Agosto , Bounded rationality and satisficing in young people's web-based decision making, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology53(1) (2001) 16—27.
27.
B. Perrin , M.B.J. Barnett, L. Walrath and J.D. Grossman, Information order and outcome framing: an assessment of judgement bias in a naturalistic decision making context , Human Factors43(2) (2001) 227.
28.
P. Vakkari , Task-based information seeking, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology37 (2003) 413—64.
29.
G.F. Smith, Managerial problem-solving: a problem-centred approach. In: C.E. Zsambok and G. Klein (eds), Naturalistic Decision Making ( Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 1997) 371—380.
30.
R. Lipshitz and O. Ben Shaul, Schemata and metal models. In: C. E. Zsambok and G. Klein (eds), Naturalistic Decision Making (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates , Mahwah, NJ, 1997) 293—303.
31.
T. Maqsood, A.D. Finegan and D.H.T. Walker, Biases and heuristics in judgment and decision making: The dark side of tacit knowledge. Proceedings of the Informing Science + Information Technology Education Joint Conference. Rockhampton , Qld, June 25—28 2004 (2004).
32.
L.R. Beach , Broadening the definition of decision making: The role of prechoice screening of options, Psychological Science4(4) (1993) 215—220.
33.
R. Lipshitz , G. Klein, J. Orasanu and E. Salas, Focus article: taking stock of naturalistic decision making, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making14(5) (2001) 331—352.
34.
P. Meso, M.D. Troutt and J. Rudnicka, A review of naturalistic decision making research with some implications for knowledge management, Journal of Knowledge Management6(1) (2002) 63—73.
35.
M.R. Endsley , The role of situation awareness in naturalistic decision making. In: C. E. Zsambok and G. Klein (eds), Naturalistic Decision Making (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 1997) 269—283.
36.
M.S. Feldman , Order without design: Information production and policy making (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, 1989).
M. Considine , Public policy: a critical approach ( Macmillan, Melbourne, 1994).
39.
R. Gualtieri , Impact of the emerging information society on the policy development process and democratic quality. 1999 , OECD Public Management Service. Public Management Committee : Paris. Available at http://www.olis.oecd.org/olis/1998doc.nsf/LinkTo/PUMA(98)15 (accessed 30 April 2007)
40.
H.A. Simon , Administrative decision making, Public Administration Review25(1) (1965) 31—37.
41.
R. Lipshitz , G. Klein, J. Orasanu and E. Salas, Rejoinder: A welcome dialogue — and the need to continue, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making14(5) ( 2001) 385—389.
42.
D. Kahneman, P. Slovic and A. Tversky, Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1982 ).
43.
H. Jungermann , One mode of decision making (Research) — no less, no more, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making14(5) (2001) 367—370.
44.
B. Flyvbjerg , Five misunderstandings about case study research , Qualitative Inquiry12(2) (2006) 219—245.
45.
G. Whyte , Perspectives on naturalistic decision making from organizational behavior, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making14(5) (2001) 383—384.
46.
G. Gigerenzer and D.G. Goldstein, Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality, Psychological Review103(4) (1996) 650—669.
47.
H. Mintzberg and F. Westley, Decision making: It's not what you think , MIT Sloan Management Review42(3) (2001) 89—93.
48.
T. Anderson, Relevance as process: Judgements in the context of scholarly research, Information Research10(2) (2005) Paper 226. Available at http://informationr.net/ir/10—2/paper226.html (accessed 13 April 2007).
49.
N. Parker and J.M. Berryman, The role of affect in judging what is enough? In: D. Nahl and D. Bilal (eds), Information and Emotions: The Emergent Affective Paradigm in Information Behavior Research and Theory (Information Today Inc., Medford, NJ, in press).
