Knowledge management (KM) is now widely recognized to be important to the success or failure of business management. Seeking to better understand the determinants of the evolution of KM, this study focuses on two main problems: (1) whether firms change their KM processes over time to improve KM effectiveness as well as develop their KM practices, and (2) whether socio-technical support results in more mature KM practices. This study draws on the previous literature to identify key dimensions of KM process (knowledge acquisition, knowledge conversion, knowledge application and knowledge protection), KM effectiveness (individual-level and organizational-level KM effectiveness) and socio-technical support (organizational support and information technology diffusion). The evolution of these dimensions is studied in the form of a stage model of KM that includes initiation, development, and mature stages. Data gathered from 141 senior executives in large Taiwanese organizations were employed to test the propositions. The results show that different stages of KM evolution can be distinguished across dimensions of KM process, KM effectiveness, and socio-technical support. Implications for organizations are also discussed.
C.C. Lee and J. Yang, Knowledge value chain, Journal of Management Development19(9) (2000) 783—93.
2.
R. Jones, Measuring the benefits of knowledge management at the Financial Services Authority: a case study, Journal of Information Science29(6) (2003) 475—87.
3.
Y. Jarrar , Knowledge management: learning for organizational experience, Managerial Auditing Journal17(6) (2002) 322—8.
4.
I. Nonaka , A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation, Organization Science15(1) (1994) 14—37.
5.
M. Horwitch and R. Armacost, Helping knowledge management be all it can be, Journal of Business Strategy23(3) (2002) 26—31.
6.
I. Nonaka and H. Takeuchi, The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation (Oxford University Press, New York, 1995).
7.
G.D. Bhatt , Knowledge management in organizations: examining the interaction between technologies, techniques, and people, Journal of Knowledge Management5(1) (2001) 68—75.
8.
A.H. Gold , A. Malhotra and A.H. Segars, Knowledge management: an organizational capabilities perspective, Journal of Management Information Systems18(1) (2001) 185—214.
9.
A.S. Cui , D.A. Griffith and S.T. Cavusgil, The influence of competitive intensity and market dynamism on knowledge management capabilities of multinational corporation subsidiaries, Journal of International Marketing13(3) ( 2005) 32—53.
10.
T.L. Ju , B. Lin and H.J. Kuo , TQM critical factors and KM value chain activities , Total Quality Management and Business Excellence17(3) (2006) 373—93.
11.
H.F. Lin and G.G. Lee , Impact of organizational learning and knowledge management factors on e-business adoption, Management Decision43(2) ( 2005) 171—88.
12.
W. Cohen and D. Levinthal, Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation , Administrative Science Quarterly35(1) (1990) 128—52.
13.
S.A. Zahra and G. George, Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension , Academy of Management Review27(2) (2002) 185—203.
14.
A. Inkpen and A. Dinur, Knowledge management processes and international joint ventures, Organization Science9(4) (1998) 454—68.
15.
G.P. Huber, Organizational learning: the contributing processes and literatures , Organization Science2(1) (1991), 88—114.
16.
C. O'Dell and C. Grayson, If only we knew what we know: identification and transfer of internal best practices, California Management Review40(3) (1998) 154—74.
17.
A. Kankanhalli , B.C.Y. Tan and K.K. Wei , Understanding seeking from electronic knowledge repositories: an empirical study, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology56(11) (2005) 1156—66.
18.
T. Davenport and P. Klahr, Managing customer support knowledge , California Management Review40(3) (1998) 195—208.
19.
R. Bose, Knowledge management capabilities and infrastructure for e-commerce , Journal of Computer Information Systems42(5) (2002) 40—49.
20.
G. Widen-Wulff and M. Ginman, Explaining knowledge sharing in organizations through the dimensions of social capital, Journal of Information Science30(5) (2004) 448—58.
21.
J. Proter-Liebskind , Knowledge, strategy, and the theory of the firm , Strategic Management Journal17(2) (1996) 93—107.
22.
B. Kogut and U. Zander, Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology, Organization Science3(3) (1992) 383—97.
23.
R.M. Grant , Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: organizational capability as knowledge integration, Organization Science7(4) (1996) 375—87.
24.
I. Becerra-Fernandez and R. Sabherwal, Organizational knowledge management: a contingency perspective, Journal of Management InformationSystems18(1) (2001) 23—55.
25.
M.Y. Chen and A.P. Chen, Integrating option model and knowledge management performance measures: an empirical study, Journal of Information Science31(5) (2005) 381—93.
26.
T.C. Chou , P.L. Chang, C.T. Tsai and Y.P. Cheng, Internal learning climate, knowledge management process and perceived knowledge management satisfaction , Journal of Information Science31(4) (2005) 283—96.
27.
A.K. Gupta and V. Govindarajan, Knowledge management's social dimension: lessons from Nucor Steel, Sloan Management Review42(1) (2000) 71—80.
28.
R. Sabherwal and I. Becerra-Fernandez, An empirical study of the effect of knowledge management processes at individual, group, and organizational levels, Decision Sciences34(2) (2003) 225—60.
29.
C.M. Fiol , Consensus, diversity, and learning in organizations , Organization Science5(3) (1994) 403—20.
30.
J. Xu and M. Quaddus, A six-stage model for the effective diffusion of knowledge management systems, Journal of Management Development24(4) ( 2005) 362—73.
31.
J.H. Lee and Y.G. Kim , A stage model of organizational KM: a latent content analysis, Expert Systems with Applications20(4) (2001) 299—311.
32.
P. Gottschalk , Expert systems at stage IV of the knowledge management technology stage model: the case of police investigations, Expert Systems with Applications31(3) (2006) 617—28.
33.
H.F. Lin and G.G. Lee , Effects of socio-technical factors on organizational intention to encourage knowledge sharing, Management Decision44(1) ( 2006) 74—88.
34.
S. Moffett , R. McAdam and S. Parkinson, Technology and people factors in knowledge management: an empirical analysis, Total Quality Management14(2) ( 2003) 215—24.
35.
Y.J. Yeh , S.Q. Lai and C.T. Ho , Knowledge management enablers: a case study , Industrial Management and Data Systems106(6) (2006) 793—810.
36.
S.Yahya and W.K. Goh, Managing human resources toward achieving knowledge management, Journal of Knowledge Management6(5) (2002) 457—68.
37.
A. Jantunen , Knowledge-processing capabilities and innovative performance: an empirical study, European Journal of InnovationManagement8(3) (2005) 336—49.
38.
G. Bhatt, J.N.D. Gupta and F. Kitchens, An exploratory study of groupware use in the knowledge management process, The Journal of EnterpriseInformation Management18(1) ( 2005) 28—46.
39.
A. Daghfous , Absorptive capacity and the implementation of knowledge-intensive best practices , S.A.M. Advanced Management Journal69(2) (2004) 21—7.
40.
P. Gottschalk , Predictors of IT support for knowledge management in the professions: an empirical study of law firms in Norway, Journal ofInformation Technology15(1) (2000) 69—78.
41.
S.H. Liao, Knowledge management technologies and applications — literature review from 1995 to 2002, Expert Systems with Applications25(2) ( 2003) 155—64.
42.
K. Kautz and K. Thaysen, Knowledge, learning and IT support in a small software company, Journal of Knowledge Management15(4) (2001) 349—57.
43.
J.C. Anderson and D.W. Gerbing, An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment, Journal of Marketing Research25(2) (1988) 186—92.
44.
K.G. Joreskog and D. Sorbom, LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling (Scientific Software International, Chicago, 1996).
45.
R.P. Bagozzi and Y. Yi , On the evaluation of structural equation models , Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science16(1) (1988) 74—94.
46.
J.F. Hair, R.L. Anderson and W.C. Tatham, Multivariate Data Analysis withReading ( Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1998).
47.
H. Lee and B. Choi, Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: an integrative view and empirical examination , Journal of Management Information Systems20(1) (2003) 179—228.
48.
W.Y. Wu and H.J. Tsai, Impact of social capital and business operation mode on intellectual capital and knowledge management, International Journal of TechnologyManagement30(1) (2005) 147—71.
49.
G.W. Bock , R.W. Zmud and Y.G. Kim , Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate, MIS Quarterly29(1) (2005) 87—111.
50.
G.F. Templeton , B.R. Lewis and C.A. Snyder, Development of a measure for the organizational learning construct, Journal of Management InformationSystems19(2) ( 2002) 175—218.
51.
T.S.H. Teo and Y. Pian, A model for Web adoption, Information and Management41(4) (2004) 457—68.
52.
C.J. Chen , The effects of knowledge attributes, alliance characteristics, and absorptive capacity on knowledge transfer performance , R&D Management34(3) (2004) 311—21.
