This paper describes research that aims to define the information needs of mobile individuals, to implement a mobile information system that can satisfy those needs, and finally to evaluate the performance of that system with end-users. First a review of the emerging discipline of geographic information retrieval (GIR) is presented as background to the more specific issue of mobile information retrieval. Following this, a user needs study is described evaluating the requirements of potential users of a mobile information system; the study finds that there is a strong geographic component to users' information needs. Next, four geographic post-query filters are described which attempt to represent the region of space associated with an individual's query made at some specific spatial location. These filters are spatial proximity (distance in space), temporal proximity (travel time), speed-heading prediction surfaces (likelihood of visiting locations) and visibility (locations that can be seen). Two of these filters — spatial proximity and speed-heading prediction surfaces — are implemented in a mobile information system and subsequently evaluated with users in an outdoor setting. The results of evaluation suggest that retrieved information to which post-query geographic filters have been applied is considered more relevant than unfiltered information, and that users find information sorted by spatial proximity to be more relevant than that sorted by a prediction surface of likely future locations. The paper closes with a discussion of the wider implications of these results for developers of mobile information systems and location-based services.
F. Cairncross , The death of distance: how the communication revolution will change our lives, American Quarterly51(1) (1999) 160.
2.
S. Bates, The death of geography, the rise of anonymity and the internet, International Information Communication andEducation19(1) (2000) 122—6.
3.
M.P. Kwan, Gender differences in space-time constraints, AreaInstitute of British Geographers32(2) (2000) 145—56.
4.
B. Lenntorp, A time-geographic simulation model of individual activity programmes. In: T. Carlstein, D. Parkes and N. Thrift (eds), Timing Space and Spacing Time Volume 2: Human Activity and Time Geography (Edward Arnold, London, 1978).
5.
S. Openshaw and J. Goddard, Some implications of the commodification of information and the emerging information economy for applied geographical analysis in the United Kingdom, Environment and Planning A19 (1987) 1423—39.
6.
P.A. Longley , M.F. Goodchild, D.J. Maguire and D.W. Rhind, Systems, science, and study. In: D.W. Rhind (ed.), Geographical Information Systems and Science (John Wiley , Chichester, 2001).
7.
M.J. Silva , B. Martins, M. Chaves, A.P. Afonso and N. Cardoso, Adding geographic scopes to web resources, ComputersEnvironment and Urban Systems30(4) (2006) 378—99.
8.
M.F. Goodchild , Towards a geography of geographic information in a digital world, Computers Environment and Urban Systems21(6) ( 1997) 377—92.
9.
C. Jones, H. Alani and D. Tudhope, Geographical terminology servers — closing the semantic divide. In: M. Goodchild, M. Duckham and M. Worboys (eds), Perspectives on Geographic Information Science, (Taylor and Francis, London, 2002) 201—18.
10.
C.B. Jones, R. Purves, A. Ruas, M. Sanderson, M. Sester, M. van Kreveld and R. Weibel, Spatial information retrieval and geographical ontologies: an overview of the SPIRIT project. In: The Proceedings of SIGIR'02 (ACM, Tampere, Finland, 2002) 387—8.
11.
Google, Google Local (2006). Available at http://local.google.co.uk/ (accessed 10 April 2006).
12.
A. Helal, B. Haskell, J.L. Carter, R. Brice, D. Woelk and M. Rusinkiewicz (eds), Any Time, Anywhere Computing: Mobile Computing Concepts and Technology ( Kluwer, Boston, 1999).
13.
S. Brewster , Overcoming the lack of screen space on mobile computers, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing6(3) (2002) 188—205.
14.
L. Passani , Building usable wireless applications for mobile phones, Lecture Notes in Computer Science2411 (2002) 9—20.
15.
J. Ostrem, Palm OS User Interface Guidelines (2002). Available at www.palmos.com/dev/support/docs/ui/UIGuide_Front.html (accessed 10 Apr 2006).
16.
M. Kulju and E. Kaasinen, Route guidance using a 3D city model on a mobile device. In: Mobile HCI02 Workshop: Mobile Tourism Support Systems ( Pisa, Italy, 2002). Available at www.mguides.info (accessed 8 January 2007).
17.
D. Chincholle , M. Goldstein, M. Nyberg and M. Eriksson, Lost or found? a usability evaluation of a mobile navigation and location-based service, Lecture Notes in Computer Science2411 (2002) 211—24.
18.
J. Kjeldskov , `Just-in-place' information for mobile device interfaces, Lecture Notes in Computer Science2411 (2002) 271—5.
19.
A. Brimicombe and Y. Li , Mobile space-time envelopes for location-based services, Transactions in GIS10(1) (2006) 5—23.
20.
Open Geospatial Consortium, Open Location Services — OpenLS (2005). Available at www.opengeospatial.org/functional/?page=ols (accessed 10 August 2006).
21.
E. Amitay, N. Har-El, R. Sivian and A. Soffer, Finding the geographic focus of web-pages. In: R. Purves and C. Jones (eds) Workshop on Geographic Information Retrieval, SIGIR 2004 (Sheffield University, Sheffield, 2004). Available at www.geo.unizh.ch/~rsp/gir/index.html (accessed 8 January 2007).
22.
R. Jose, A. Moreira, H. Rodrigues and N. Davies, The AROUND architecture for dynamic location-based services, Mobile Networks and Applications8(4) (2003) 377—87.
23.
D.M. Mountain , Exploring Mobile Trajectories: an Investigation of Individual Spatial Behaviour and Geographic Filters for Information Retrieval (City University, London, 2005).
24.
J.F. Raper, Geographic relevance. In: Meeting on Fundamental Questions in GIScience (Palace Hotel, Manchester, 2001).
25.
C.W. Cleverdon , J. Mills and E.M. Keen, Factors Determining the Performance of Indexing Systems, Vol. 1: Design (Cranfield University, Cranfield, 1966).
26.
A. Spink , H. Greisdorf and J. Bateman, From highly relevant to not relevant: examining different regions of relevance, Information Processing and Management34(5) (1998) 599—621.
27.
P. Vakkari and N. Hakala, Changes in relevance criteria and problem stages in task performance, Journal of Documentation56(5) (2000) 540—62.
28.
P. Ingwersen , Cognitive perspectives of information retrieval interaction: elements of a cognitive IR theory, Journal of Documentation52(1) (1996) 3—50.
29.
P. Borlund and P. Ingwersen, The development of a method for the evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems, Journal of Documentation53(3) (1997) 225—50.
30.
T. Saracevic , Relevance reconsidered. In: Information science: Integration in perspectives. Proceedings of the Second Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science (CoLIS 2), Copenhagen, Denmark, 1996 (Royal School of Librarianship, Copenhagen, 1996) 201—18.
31.
T. Saracevic , Interactive models in information retrieval (IR): a review and proposal. In: S. Hardin (ed.), Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 1996 (ASIS, Silver Spring, 1996) 3—9.
32.
M. Sanderson and J. Kohler, Analyzing geographic queries. In: R. Purves and C. Jones (eds) Workshop on Geographic Information Retrieval, SIGIR 2004 (Sheffield University, Sheffield, 2004). Available at www.geo.unizh.ch/~rsp/gir/index.html (accessed 8 January 2007 ).
33.
M. Nissim, C. Matheson and J. Reid, Recognising geographic entities in Scottish historical documents. In: R. Purves and C. Jones (eds) Workshop on Geographic Information Retrieval, SIGIR 2004 (Sheffield University, Sheffield, 2004). Available at www.geo.unizh.ch/~rsp/gir/index.html (accessed 8 January 2007 ).
34.
F.C. Gey and K. Carl, Geotemporal access to multilingual documents. In: R. Purves and C. Jones (eds) Workshop on Geographic Information Retrieval, SIGIR 2004 (Sheffield University, Sheffield, 2004). Available at www.geo.unizh.ch/~rsp/gir/index.html (accessed 8 January 2007).
35.
M. Worboys and M. Duckham (eds), GIS: a Computing Perspective ( CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2004).
36.
T. Sagara and M. Kitsuregawa, Yellow page driven method of collecting and scoring spatial web documents . In: R. Purves and C. Jones (eds) Workshop on Geographic Information Retrieval, SIGIR 2004 (Sheffield University, Sheffield, 2004). Available at www.geo.unizh.ch/~rsp/gir/index.html (accessed 8 January 2007 ).
37.
N. Davies, K. Cheverst, K. Mitchell and A. Friday, Caches in the air: disseminating tourist information in the GUIDE system. In: Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, WMCSA `99 ( IEEE, New Orleans, 1999) 11—19.
38.
A. Edwardes, D. Burghardt and R. Weibel, WebPark — location based services for species search in recreation areas . In: 21st International Cartographic Conference & 12th General Assembly of the International Cartographic Association , Durban, 10—16 August 2003. [Available on CD ROM]
39.
L. Hill, M.F. Goodchild and G. Janee, Research directions within the georeferenced IR based on the Alexandria Digital Library Project. In: R. Purves and C. Jones (eds) Workshop on Geographic Information Retrieval, SIGIR 2004 ( Sheffield University, Sheffield, 2004). Available at www.geo.unizh.ch/~rsp/gir/index.html (accessed 8 January 2007).
40.
P. Clough, Extracting metadata for spatially-aware information retrieval on the internet . In: Workshop on Geographic Information Retrieval, SIGIR 2005 Bremen, Germany (ACM Press, New York, 2005) 25—30.
41.
R. Purves, P. Clough and H. Joho, Identifying imprecise regions for geographic information retrieval using the web. In: R. Billen et al. (eds), GIS Research UK Conference (University of Glasgow , Glasgow, 2005) 313—18.
42.
C.B. Jones, A.I. Abdelmoty, D. Finch, G. Fu and S. Vaid, The SPIRIT spatial search engine: architecture, ontologies and spatial indexing, Lecture Notes in Computer Science3234 (2004) 125—39.
43.
A. Arampatzis , M. van Kreveld, I. Reinbacher, C.B. Jones, S. Vaid, P. Clough, H. Joho and M. Sanderson, Web-based delineation of imprecise regions, ComputersEnvironment and Urban Systems30(4) (2006) 436—59.
44.
R. Larson and P. Frontiera, Ranking and representation for geographic information retrieval. In: R. Purves and C. Jones (eds) Workshop on Geographic Information Retrieval, SIGIR 2004 ( Sheffield University, Sheffield, 2004). Available at www.geo.unizh.ch/~rsp/gir/index.html (accessed 8 January 2007).
45.
S.E. Robertson and K. Sparck-Jones, Relevance weighting of search terms , Journal of the American Society for Information Science27(3) ( 1976) 129—46.
46.
M. van Kreveld , I. Reinbacher, A. Arampatzis and R. van Zwol, Multi-dimensional scattered ranking methods for geographic information retrieval, Geoinformatica9(1) ( 2005) 61—84.
47.
K. Beard and V. Sharma, Multidimensional ranking for data in digital spatial libraries, International Journal on Digital Libraries1(2) (1997) 153—60.
48.
D.M. Mountain and J.F. Raper, Positioning techniques for location-based services: characteristics and limitations of proposed solutions, Aslib Proceedings53(10) (2001) 404—12.
49.
J. Jose and S. Downes, Evaluation of mobile information retrieval strategies. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, Denver (ACM, New York , 2005) 411.
50.
H.I. Myrthaug , N. Whitehead, A. Goker, T.E. Faegri and T.C. Lech, Ambiesense a system and reference architecture for personalised context-sensitive information services for mobile users. In: P. Markopoulos et al. (eds), Ambient Intelligence: Second European Symposium, EUSAI 2004, Eindhoven, 8—11 November 2004. Volume 3295 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Springer, 2004) 327—38.
51.
WebPark, Geographically Relevant Information for Mobile Users in Protected Areas (2005). Available at www.webparkservices.info (accessed 27 April 2005).
52.
Camineo, Create Your Mobile Multimedia Location Guide (2006). Available at www.camineo.com (accessed 27 June 2006).
53.
K. Krug, W. Abderhalden and R. Haller, Analysis and Definition of User Needs Report (2002). Available at www.webparkservices.info/pdfs/WP_D221_Analysis_and_Definition_of_User_Needs_v03.pdf (accessed 8 January 2007).
54.
A. Spink , B.J. Jansen, D. Wolfram and T. Saracevic, From e-sex to e-commerce: web search changes, Computer35(3) (2002) 107—9.
55.
Yell Group, The UK's Local Search Engine (2005). Available at www.yell.com (accessed 27 April 2005).
56.
Vodafone, Vodafone: The Company (2005). Available at www.vodafone.co.uk (accessed 28 July 2005).
57.
D.M. Mountain , A. Goncalves and A. Rodrigues, Geographic knowledge discovery and spatial agent interfaces for location-based services. In: J. Wood (ed.) GIS Research UK ( City University, London, 2003) 206—9.
58.
C. Nothegger , S. Winter and M. Raubal, Selection of salient features for route directions, Spatial Cognition and Computation4(2) (2004) 113—36.
59.
K. Krug and W. Abderhalden, Report on Testing and Validation (2004). Available at www.webparkservices.info/pdfs/WP_D621_Testing_and_Validation_SNP_2004_v05.pdf (accessed 8 January 2007).
60.
G.M. Giaglis , Towards a classification framework for mobile location services. In: B.E. Mennecke and T.J. Strader (eds), Mobile Commerce: Technology, Theory and Applications (Idea Group Publishing , Hershey, PA, 2003) 67—85.
61.
upmystreet.com, upmystreet.com (2005). Available at www.upmystreet.com (accessed 29 July 2005).
62.
P. Fisher and J. Wood, What is a mountain? or the Englishman who went up a Boolean geographical concept but realised it was fuzzy, Geography83(360) (1998) 247—56.
63.
P. Fisher , J. Wood and T. Cheng, Where is Helvellyn? Fuzziness of multi-scale landscape morphometry, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers29(1) (2004) 106—28.
64.
Berg Insight AB, The Structure Of The European LBS Market 2005 (Berg Insight AB, Dublin, 2005).
