Organizations, national governments and supranational bodies have all been active in formulating measures to regulate access to internet content. This paper reports the findings of a documentary analysis of such measures adopted over a 10-year period by the European Union. The investigation took place from a perspective of concern for the potential impact of such initiatives on freedom of expression and freedom of enquiry. On a theoretical level, the study adopted Lessig's models of direct and indirect regulation as an analytical framework. The Habermasian concept of the erosion of the Public Sphere was used as an analogy for the issues posed by the regulation of speech on the internet. It is argued that the findings of the study suggest that the democratizing potential of the internet is indeed being constrained by measures imposed in an attempt to control the perceived dangers posed by the medium.
C.R. Hughes and G. Wacker (eds), China and the Internet: Politics of the Digital Leap Forward (RoutledgeCurzon, London, 2003).
2.
L. Tsui, The panopticon as the antithesis of a space of freedom: control and regulation of the internet in China, China Information17(2) (2003) 65—82.
3.
J. Lacharite , Electronic decentralisation in China: a critical analysis of internet filtering policies in the People's Republic of China , Australian Journal of Political Science37(2) (2002) 333—46.
4.
N. Hachigian , China's cyber-strategy, Foreign Affairs80(2) (2001) 118—33.
5.
G.L. Taubman , State-sanctioned surfing, limited connectivity, and varied access to cyberspace in non-democracies, Asian Perspective [S. Korea]27(2) (2003) 105—40.
6.
L. Lessig, Code and otherLaws of Cyberspace (Basic Books, New York, 1999).
7.
I. Rowlands , Understanding information policy: concepts, frameworks and research tools, Journal of Information Science22(1) ( 1996) 13—25.
8.
I. Rowlands and P. Turner, Models and frameworks for information policy work. In: I. Rowlands (ed.), Understanding Information Policy (Bowker Saur, London, 1997) 83—8.
9.
J. Milton, Areopagitica: for the Liberty of Unlicensed Printing ( Clarendon, Oxford, 1973). [Originally published 1644]
10.
J. Habermas , The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere (Polity, Cambridge, 1989).
11.
W. Outhwaite , Habermas: a Critical Introduction ( Polity, Cambridge, 1994).
12.
M. Dean, Governmentality : Power and Rule in Modern Society ( Sage, London, 1999).
13.
S. Cohen, Folk Devils and Moral Panic: the Creation of the Mods and Rockers (Martin Robertson, Oxford, 1980).
14.
A. Newey, Freedom of expression: censorship in private hands. In: Liberty (eds), Liberating Cyberspace: Civil Liberties, Human Rights and the Internet (Pluto, London, 1999) 13—43.
15.
I. de Sola Pool , Technologies of Freedom: on Free Speech in an Electronic Age (Belknap, Cambridge, MA, 1983).
16.
N. Moore, Introduction .In: I. Rowlands and S. Vogel, Information Policies: a Sourcebook (Taylor Graham, London , 1991) 1—5.
17.
K.A. Hill and J.E. Hughes, Cyberpolitics : Citizen Activism in the Age of the Internet (Rowman & Littlefield, Oxford , 1998).
18.
S. Green , A plague on the panopticon: surveillance and power in the global information economy, Information, Communication and Society2(1) (1999) 26—44.
19.
J. Slevin, The Internet and Society (Polity, Cambridge, 2000).
20.
S. Davies, A year after 9/11: where are we now? Communications of theACM45(9) (2002) 35—9.
21.
Office for National Statistics, 2004 e-commerce Survey of Business (2005). Available at: www.statistics.gov.uk/downloads/theme_economy/ecommerce_report_2004.pdf (accessed 6 January 2006).
22.
S.E. Ebersole , On their own: students' academic use of the commercialized Web, Library Trends53(4) (2005) 530—38.
23.
T. Jordan, Cyberpower: the Culture and Politics of Cyberspace and the Internet (Routledge, London, 1999 ).
24.
A.C. Clarke, Voices from the Sky (Harper & Row, New York, 1965).
25.
M. Castells, The Power of Identity (Oxford, Blackwell, 1997).
26.
M. Castells, The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business and Society (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001).
27.
R. Woolnough , Web driver issues free ticket to ride, Times Higher Education Supplement (30 March 2001) 17.
28.
K.C. Laudon, Ethical concepts and information technology, Communications of theACM38(12) (1995) 33—9.
29.
D. Wall, Policing the Internet: maintaining law and order on the cyberbeat. In: Y. Akdeniz, C. Walker and D. Wall (eds), The Internet, Law and Society (Pearson, Harlow, 2000) 154—74.
30.
D. Burt, In defence of filtering, American Libraries28(7) (1997) 46—7.
31.
E. Volokh, Freedom of speech, shielding children and transcending balance, Supreme Court Review141 (1997) 141—97.
32.
H. Auld, Filters work: get over it, American Libraries34(2) (2003) 38—42.
33.
Datamonitor, Internet Filtering: Preventing Porn and Pushing Productivity (2002). Available at: www.commentwire.com/commwire_story.asp?commentwire_ID=3647 (accessed 5 July 2004).
34.
J.B. Pierce, Blaise Cronin: defender of CIPA, American Libraries34(2) (2003) 41.
35.
J.D. Lasica , Censorship devices on the Internet, American Journalism Review19(7) (1997) 56.
36.
P. Fine, Cyber Patrol halts student, Times Higher Education Supplement (23 November 2001) 56.
37.
Epic, Filters and Freedom 2.0: Free Speech Perspectives on Internet Content Controls (EPIC, Washington, DC, 2001).
38.
J. Frechette , Cyber-democracy or Cyber-hegemony? Exploring the political and economic structures of the Internet as an alternative source of information, Library Trends53(4) (2005) 555—75.
39.
P. Resnick and H.R. Varian (eds), Recommender systems, Communications of the ACM, 40(3) (1997) Special Section 56—89. [CACM Special Issue.]
40.
Aclu, Fahrenheit 451.2: Is Cyberspace Burning? How Rating and Blocking Proposals May Torch Free Speech on the Internet (1997). Available at: http://archive.aclu.org/issues/cyber/burning.html (accessed 5 July 2004).
41.
C.R. Sunstein, Democracy and filtering , Communications of theACM47(12) (2004) 57—9.
42.
D. Stoker , Filtering out minorities (editorial), Journal of Librarianship and Information Science31(1) (1999) 3—6.
43.
A.L. Shapiro , The Control Revolution: How the Internet is Putting Individuals in Charge and Changing the World We Know (Century Foundation/Public Affairs, New York, 1999).
44.
L. Lessig , The law of the horse: what cyberlaw might teach, HarvardLaw Journal113 (1999) 501—46.
45.
M. Bangemann et al, Europe and the Global Information Society: Recommendations to the European Council High Level Group on the Information Society (European Council, Brussels , 1994).
46.
B. Mahon, European information policy: the role of institutional factors. In: I. Rowlands (ed.), Understanding Information Policy (Bowker Saur, London, 1997) 101—13.
47.
J. Dearnley and J. Feather, The Wired World: an Introduction to the Theory and Practice of the Information Society (Library Association, London , 2001).
48.
A. Charlesworth , The governance of the Internet in Europe. In: Y. Akdeniz, C. Walker and D. Wall (eds) The Internet, Law and Society (Pearson, Harlow, 2000) 47—8.
49.
P. Campbell and E. Machet, European policy on regulation of content on the Internet. In: Liberty (eds), Liberating Cyberspace: Civil Liberties, Human Rights and the Internet (Pluto, London, 1999) 140—58.
50.
European Commission, Communication on the Implications of the Information Society for European Union Policies — Preparing the Next Steps. COM (96) 395.
51.
P. Cincera, The European Union content regulation in the converged communication environment . In: K.A. Eliassen and M. Sjovaag (eds), European Union Telecommunications Liberalisation (Routledge, London , 1999) 74—90.
52.
European Commission, Treaty on European Union, Cm.1394 (Stationery Office, London, 1992). Available at: http://europa.eu.int/abc/treaties_en.htm (accessed 12 January 2006).
53.
Y. Akdeniz and C. Walker, Whisper who dares: encryption, privacy rights and the new world disorder. In: Y. Akdeniz, C. Walker and D. Wall, The Internet, Law and Society (Pearson, Harlow, 2000) 317—48.
54.
European Commission, Communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Illegal and Harmful Content on the Internet. COM (96) 487.
55.
European Parliament, Multiannual Community Action Plan on promoting safer use of the Internet by combating illegal and harmful content on global networks, Official Journal of the European Communities L336 (1999) 1.
56.
C. Kuner, Judgement of the Munich court in the Compuserve case: translation and commentary (n.d.). Available at: www.kuner.com/data/reg/somm.html (accessed 12 January 2006).
57.
C. Gringras, The Laws of the Internet (Butterworths LexisNexis, London, 2003).
58.
European Commission, Green Paper on the Protection of Minors and Human Dignity in Audiovisual and Information Services. COM (96) 483.
59.
European Commission, Illegal and harmful content on the Internet: interim report on initiatives in EU Member States with respect to combating illegal and harmful content on the Internet , Info 2000, version 7 (4 June 1997).
60.
European Commission, Communication to the European Parliament, the Council and the Economic and Social Committee on the Follow-up to the Green Paper on the Protection of Minors and Human Dignity in Audiovisual and Information Services including a Proposal for a Recommendation. COM (97) 570 final (18 November 1997).
61.
Council of Europe, Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ( Council of Europe, Strasbourg, 1950 ). Available at: http://conventions.coe.int/treaty/en/Treaties/Html/005.htm (accessed 19 January 2006).
62.
Legal and Advisory Board, Response to the Green Paper on the Protection of Minors and Human Dignity in Audiovisual and Information Services (Legal and Advisory Board, Brussels, 1997).
63.
European Commission, Proposal for a Recommendation on the Protection of Minors and Human Dignity and the Right of Reply in Relation to the Competitiveness of the European Audiovisual and Information Services Industry. COM (2004) 341.
64.
European Parliament, The Internet — tackling pornography and other abuses: consultation procedure [A4—0234/98-Schmid], Session News: the Week (1998) Brussels, 1—2 July, 9—10.
65.
European Parliament, Promoting safe use of the Internet: co-decision procedure — second reading [A4—0377/98-Schmid], Session News: Strasbourg Briefing (1998) Strasbourg, 16—20 November, 18.
66.
European Commission, Communication from the Commission on the Follow-up to the Multiannual Community Action Plan on Promoting Safer Use of the Internet by Combating Illegal and Harmful Content on Global Networks. COM (2002 ) 152.
67.
European Economic and Social Committee, Protection of Children on the Internet, Press Release 37/2003 (EESC, Brussels, 2003).
68.
European Commission, Decision No. 115/2003/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Decision No. 276/1999/EC adopting Multiannual Community Action Plan on Promoting Safer Use of the Internet by Combating Illegal and Harmful Content on Global Networks, Official Journal of the European Union L162 (2003) 1.
69.
European Commission, Decision No 854/2005/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 establishing a Multiannual Community Programme on Promoting Safer Use of the Internet and New Online Technologies (2005). Available at: http://europa.eu.int/information_society/activities/sip/programme/index_en.htm (accessed 2 February 2006).
70.
European Parliament, Council, Commission , Interinstitutional Agreement on better law-making, Official Journal of theEuropean UnionC321 (2003) 1.
71.
L. Senden , Soft law, self-regulation and co-regulation in European law: where do they meet? Electronic Journal of Comparative Law9(1) (2005). Available at: www.ejcl.org/91/art91—3.PDF (accessed 24 July 2006).
72.
J.R. Reidenberg , Governing networks and rule-making in cyberspace . In: B. Kahin and C. Nesson, Borders in Cyberspace (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1997) 84—105.
73.
C.J. Bennett and C.D. Raab, The Governance of Privacy: Policy Instruments in Global Perspective (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2006).
74.
W.H. Dutton and M. Peltu, The Emerging Internet Governance Mosaic: Connecting the Pieces. Forum Discussion Paper No. 5 (Oxford Internet Institute, Oxford, 2005).
75.
D. MacKenzie and J. Wajcman, The Social Shaping of Technology (Open University Press, Buckingham, 1999).
76.
I. Hosein, P. Tsiavos and E. Whitley, Regulating Architecture and Architectures of Regulation: Contributions from Information Systems. 17th BILETA Annual Conference , Amsterdam, 2002. Available at: www.bileta.ac.uk/02papers/hosein.html (accessed 26 July 2006).
77.
B. Latour , When things strike back: a possible contribution of science studies to the social sciences, British Journal of Sociology51(1) (2000) 107—24.
78.
Internet censorship: US legislates as Britain volunteers , Library Association Record100(9) (1998) 457.
79.
R. Collins and C. Murroni, New Media, New Policies: Media and Communications Strategies for the Future (Polity, Cambridge, 1996).
80.
J. Klobas, Wikis: Tools for Information Work and Collaboration (Chandos , Oxford, 2006).
