The convergence of digital libraries and the peer-review process

Abstract

Pre-print repositories have seen a significant increase in use over the past fifteen years across multiple research domains. Researchers are beginning to develop applications capable of using these repositories to assist the scientific community above and beyond the pure dissemination of information. The contributions set forth by this paper emphasize a deconstructed publication model in which the peer-review process is mediated by an Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (OAI-PMH) peer-review service. This peer-review service uses a social-network algorithm to determine potential reviewers for a submitted manuscript and for weighting the influence of each participating reviewer's evaluations. This paper also suggests a set of peer-review specific metadata tags that can accompany a pre-print's existing metadata record. The combinations of these contributions provide a unique repository-centric peer-review model that fits within the widely deployed OAIPMH framework.

Keywords

pre-print repositories peer-review process Open Archives Initiative OAI-PMH

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Los Alamos National Laboratory Archive. Available at: http://xxx.lanl.gov (accessed 16 September 2005).

J. Garner , L. Horwood and S. Sullivan , The place of eprints in scholarly information delivery , Online Information Review 24(4) (2001) 250–256 .

Open Archives Initiative. Available at: www.openarchives.org (accessed 16 September 2005).

C.A. Lynch , Institutional repositories: essential infrastructure for scholarship in the digital age , ARL Bimonthly Report 226 (2003) 1–7 .

The Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting(2004). Available at: www.openarchives.org/OAI/openarchivesprotocol.html (accessed 16 September 2005).

R.E. Luce , E-prints intersect the digital library: inside the Los Alamos arXiv , Issues in Science and Technology Leadership 29 (2001).

B. Gitanjali , Peer review – process, perspectives, and the path ahead , Journal of Postgraduate Medicine 47(3) (2001) 210–214 .

S. Harnad , Implementing peer review on the Net: scientific quality control in scholarly electronic journals. In: R. Peek and G. Newby (eds), Scholarly Publication: The Electronic Frontier( MIT Press, Cambridge, MA , 1996) 103–108.

Thomson ISI. Available at: www.isinet.com (accessed 16 September 2005).

10.

E. Garfield , Journal impact factor: a brief review , Canadian Medical Association Journal 161(8) (1999) 979–980 .

11.

Not-so-deep impact , Nature 435(23) (2005) 1003–1004 . [Editorial]

12.

P. Ginsparg , Can peer review be better focused? Science and Technology Libraries 22(3/4) (2004) 5–17 .

13.

H.E. Roosendaal and P.A.T.M. Geurts , Forces and functions in scientific communication: an analysis of their interplay. In: The Proceedings of the Cooperative Research Information Systems Physics (CRISP '97) ( Oldenburg , 1997).

14.

H.V.d. Sompel , S. Payette , J. Erickson , C. Lagoze and S. Warner , Rethinking scholarly communication: building the systems that scholars deserve , D-Lib Magazine 10(9) (2004). Available at: www.dlib.org/dlib/september04/vandesompel/09vandesompel/html (accessed 20 December 2005).

15.

U. Pöschl , Interactive journal concept for improved scientific publishing and quality assurance , Learned Publishing 17(2) (2004) 105–113 .

16.

Berkeley Electronic Press. Available at: www.bepress.com (accessed 16 September 2005).

17.

Interjournal: a Self-Organizing Peer-Review Journal. Available at: www.interjournal.org (accessed 16 September 2005).

18.

M.E.J. Newman , Scientific collaboration networks . I. Network construction and fundamental results , Physical Review 64 (2001).

19.

M.E.J. Newman , Scientific collaboration networks . II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality , Physical Review 64 (2001).

20.

Biomedical Digital Libraries. Available at: www.bio-diglib.com (accessed 16 September 2005).

21.

H.V.d. Sompel , M.L. Nelson , C. Lagoze and S. Warner , Resource harvesting within the OAI-PMH framework , D-Lib Magazine 10(12) (2004).

22.

OpCit Project. Available at: http://opcit.eprints.org (accessed 16 September 2005).

23.

J. Bollen , H.V.d. Sompel , J. Smith and R. Luce , Toward alternative metrics of journal impact: a comparison of download and citation data , Information Processing and Management 41(6) (2005) 1419–1440 .

24.

X. Liu , J. Bollen , M.L. Nelson and H.V.d. Sompel , Coauthorship networks in the digital library research community , Information Processing and Management 41(6) (2005) 1462–1480 .

25.

C.N. Ziegler and G. Lausen , Spreading activation model for trust propagation . In: The Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on e-Technology, e-Commerce and e-Service (EEE '04)(IEEE Computer Society, Taipei, 2004) 83–97 .

26.

S. White and P. Smyth , Algorithms for estimating relative importance in networks. In: L. Getor et al. (eds), The Proceedings of the Ninth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining( ACM Press, Washington, DC , 2003) 266–275.

27.

arXiv Pre-Print Repository. Available at: http://arxiv.org (accessed 16 September 2005).

28.

D. Schauder , Electronic publishing of professional articles: attitudes of academics and implications for the scholarly communication industry , Journal of the American Society for Information Science 45(2) (1994) 73–100 .

29.

DBPL Bibliography. Available at: www.informatik.uni-trier.de/%7Eley/db/ (accessed 16 September 2005).

30.

S. Brin and L. Page , The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine , Computer Networks 30 (1998) 107–117 .

31.

S. Alston and J. Bollen, Mapping implicit author relationships in online journals(Masters Thesis, Computer Science Department, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia, 2005).

32.

T. Riggs and R. Wilensky , An algorithm for automated rating of reviewers . In: The Proceedings of the 1st ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (ACM Press, Roanoke, VA, 2001) 381–387 .

33.

Journal of Memetics. Available at: www.jom-emit.org/ (accessed 16 September 2005).