Knowledge Creation: Individual and Organizational Perspectives

Abstract

A comprehensive model that delineates the interrelationships among ‘user involvement’, ‘knowledge cognition’, ‘organizational mechanisms’, and ‘knowledge creation’ is absent. This study aims to fill this void. Unlike previous research, this study examined the issues of effective knowledge management from two perspectives: individuals, i.e. user involvement and knowledge cognition, and organizations, i.e. organizational mechanisms. In our framework, we argued that the composite effect of ‘user involvement’, ‘knowledge cognition’, and ‘organizational mechanisms’ influences the result of knowledge creation. In order to test the feasibility of this framework, we conducted an empirical study. This study employed a survey instrument to collect data from 500 organizations in manufacturing, trade, transportation, service industries, and academic institutions. A total of 271 useable responses were analyzed. The major contributions of this research are to: (a) develop a knowledge management framework based on individual and organizational perspectives; and (b) identify the impact of user involvement, knowledge cognition, and organizational mechanisms on knowledge creation. The implications of the study are provided, and further research directions are proposed.

Keywords

knowledge creation models knowledge cognition user involvement organizational mechanisms knowledge management organizations surveys

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

[1] I. Nonaka and H. Takeuchi , The Knowledge-Creating Company ( O.U.P., New York , 1995).

[2] I. Nonaka , R. Toyama , and N. Konno , SECI, ba, and leadership: a unified model of dynamic knowledge creation Long Range Planning (32) (2000) 5-34 .

[3] H. Barki and J. Hartwick , Rethinking the concept of user involvement , MIS Quarterly 13(1) (1989) 53-63 .

[4] W.R. King and D. Ko , Evaluating knowledge management and the learning organisation: an information/knowledge value chain approach , Communications of the Association for Information Systems 5(14) (2001) 1-26 .

[5] B. Debrabander and A. Edstrom , Successful information systems development projects , Management Science 24(2) (1977) 191-199 .

[6] B. Ives and M.H. Olson , User involvement and MIS success: a review of research , Management Science 30(5) (1984) 586-603 .

[7] R.F. Powers and G.W. Dickson , MIS project management: myths, opinions, and reality , California Management Review 15(3) (1973) 147-156 .

[8] M. Alavi and D.E. Leidner , Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues , MIS Quarterly 25(1) (2001) 107-136 .

[9] G.P. Huber , Organisation learning: the contributing processes and the literature , Organisation Science 2(1) (1991) 88-115 .

10.

[10] S. Nambisan , R. Agarwal , and M. Tanniru , Organisational mechanisms for enhancing user innovation in information technology , MIS Quarterly 23(3) (1999) 365-395 .

11.

[11] I. Nonaka and N. Konno , The concept of ‘ba’: building foundation for knowledge creation , California Management Review 40(3) (1998) 40-54 .

12.

[12] C.U. Ciborra , From thinking to tinkering: the grassroots of strategic information systems . In: J.I. DeGross , I. Benbasat , G. DeSanctis , and C.M. Beath (eds), Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Information Systems (New York, 1991).

13.

[13] C.W. Sherif , M. Sherif , and R.E. Nebergall (eds), Attitude and Attitude Change ( Saunders, Philadelphia , 1965).

14.

[14] H.E. Krugman , The measurement of advertising involvement , Public Opinion Quarterly (30) (1967) 583-596 .

15.

[15] E.E. Lawler and D.T. Hall , Relationship of job characteristics to job involvement, satisfaction, and intrinsic motivation , Journal of Applied Psychology 54(4) (1970) 305-312 .

16.

[16] W.M. Cohen and D.A. Levinthal , Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation , Administrative Science Quarterly 35(1) (1990) 128-152 .

17.

[17] W.R. King and T. Teo , Facilitators and inhibitors for the strategic use of information technology , Information and Management 27(2) (1994) 71-81 .

18.

[18] E. Druy , An evaluation of data processing steering committees , MIS Quarterly (8) (1984) 257-265 .

19.

[19] M. Subramani , S. Lacono , and J.C. Henderson , Bridging the IS-line interface: the role of the relationship manager . In: Proceeding of the First Americas Conference on Information Systems (Pittsburgh, 1995).

20.

[20] R.W. Zmud , Building relationships throughout the corporate entity. In: J.J. Elam et al. (eds), Transforming the IS Organisation ( ICIT Press, Washington DC , 1988).

21.

[21] S. Nilakanta and R.W. Scamell , The effect of information sources and communication channels on the diffusion of innovation in a database development environment , Management Science 36(1) (1990) 24-40 .

22.

[22] J.C. Nunnally (ed.), Psychometric Theory ( McGraw-Hill, New York , 1978).

23.

[23] H. Jain , K. Ramamurthy , H. Rhy , and M. Yasai-Ardekani , Success of data resource management in distributed environments: an empirical investigation , MIS Quarterly 22(1) (1998) 1-29 .

24.

[24] J.F. Hair , R.E. Anderson , R.L. Tatham , and W.C. Black , Multivariate Data Analysis ( PPC Books, Tulsa , 1998).

25.

[25] T.S. Raghunathan , Impact of the CEO’s participation on information systems steering committees , Journal of Management Information Systems 8(4) (1992) 83-96 .

26.

[26] H. Barki and J. Hartwick , Measuring user participation, user involvement, and user attitude , MIS Quarterly 18(1) (1994) 59-82 .