Subjectivity is discussed in the context of information processing, and its properties are considered in relation to Popper’s three Worlds model of information. The uncertainties that subjectivity creates are seen as central to some problematic issues of information handling, including classification and retrieval. An appreciation of problems relating to subjectivity also has relevance in several subject areas of interest to information science, including understanding, relevance and significance, knowledge management, and creativity.
[1] B. Lee , Talking Heads: Language, Metalanguage, and the Semiotics of Subjectivity ( Duke University Press, Durham and London , 1997).
2.
[2] J. Palmer , Scientists and information: I. Using cluster analysis to identify information style , Journal of Documentation47(2) (1991) 105–129 .
3.
[3] J. Palmer , Scientists and information: II , Journal of Documentation47 (3) (1991) 254–275 .
4.
[4] J. Heinström , The impact of personality and approaches to learning on information behaviour , Information Research5(3) (2000) Available at http://informationr.net/ir/5-3/paper.78.html (accessed 29 September 2003).
5.
[5] K. R. Popper , Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach ( Clarendon Press, Oxford , 1972).
6.
[6] B. C. Brookes , The foundations of information science. Part 1 . Philosophical aspects, Journal of Information Science2(3–4) (1980) 125–133 .
7.
[7] D. Bawden , The three worlds of health information , Journal of Information Science28(1) (2002) 51–62 .
8.
[8] S. Z. Shariq , How does knowledge transform as it is transferred? Speculations on the possibility of a cognitive theory of knowledgescapes , Journal of Knowledge Management3(4) (1999) 243–251 .
9.
[9] R. Abbott , Information transfer and cognitive mismatch: a Popperian model for studies of public understanding , Journal of Information Science23(2) (1997) 129–137 .
10.
[10] C. Johnson and M. D. Dunlop , Subjectivity and notions of time and value in interactive information retrieval , Interacting with Computers10 (1998) 67–75 .
11.
[11] S. S. Intner , Objectifying subjectivity , Technicalities21(1) (2001) 3–7 .
12.
[12] P. Enser , Visual image retrieval: seeking the alliance of concept-based and content-based paradigms , Journal of Information Science26(4) (2000) 199–210 .
13.
[13] P. Berinstein , Do you see what I see?Image indexing principles for the rest of us, Online March/April (1999) 85–88.
14.
[14] P. B. Heidorn , Image retrieval as linguistic and nonlinguistic visual model matching , Library Trends48(2) Fall (1999) 303–325 .
15.
[15] E. Panofsky , Meaning in the Visual Arts ( Doubleday Anchor Books, Garden City, New York , 1955).
16.
[16] B. Quinn , Recent theoretical approaches in classification and indexing . Knowledge Organization21(3) (1994) 140–147 .
17.
[17] F. W. Lancaster , Indexing and Abstracting in Theory and Practice ( Library Association Publishing, London , 3rd edition, 2003).
18.
[18] M. A. Spasser , The enacted fate of undiscovered public knowledge , J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci.48(8) (1997) 707–717 .
19.
[19] D. Bawden , Information systems and the stimulation of creativity , Journal of Information Science12 (1986) 203–216 .
20.
[20] E. Z. Rothkopf , Incidental memory for location of information in text , 20 Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior (1971) 608–613 .
21.
[21] D. O. Case , Conceptual organization and retrieval of text by historians: the role of memory and metaphor , J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci.42(9) (1991) 657–668 .
22.
[22] M. Gladwell , The Tipping Point: how little things can make a big difference ( Little, Brown, London , 2000).
23.
[23] E. P. Geyser , Human factors in the interaction process between man and the user friendly information retrieval system , S. Afr. J. Libr. Inf. Sci.60 (3) (1992) 167–173 .
24.
[24] N. J. Belkin , Anomalous states of knowledge as a basis for information retrieval , The Canadian Journal of Information Science5 (1980) 133–143 .
25.
[25] W. J. Wilbur , Human subjectivity and performance limits in document retrieval , Information Processing and Management32(5) (1996) 515–527 .
26.
[26] P. Wilson , Public Knowledge Private Ignorance: Toward a Library and Information Policy ( Greenwood Press, Westport, Connecticut , 1977).
27.
[27] B. Quinn , Overcoming psychological obstacles to optimal online search performance , Electronic Library21(2) (2003) 142–153 .
28.
[28] J.-A. Johannessen , B. Olsen , and J. Olaisen , Aspects of innovation theory based on knowledge-management , International Journal of Information Management19 (1999) 121–139 .
29.
[29] T. D. Wilson , The nonsense of knowledge management , Information Research8(1) (2002), Paper No.144. Available at: http://InformationR.net/ir/8-1/paper144.html (accessed 17 October 2003).
30.
[30] D. R. Swanson , Medical literature as a potential source of new knowledge , Bulletin of the Medical Library Association78 (1990) 29–37 .
31.
[31] V. John-Steiner , Notebooks of the Mind: Explorations of Thinking ( Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford , 1997).
32.
[32] A. Foster and N. Ford , Serendipity and information seeking: an empirical study , Journal of Documentation59(3) (2003) 321–340 .
33.
[33] K. Williamson , Discovered by chance: the role of incidental information acquisition in an ecological model of information use , Library and Information Science Research20(1) (1998) 23–40 .
34.
[34] S. D. Neill , The dilemma of the subjective in organisation and retrieval , Journal of Documentation43(3) (1987) 183–211 .
35.
[35] I. Nonaka , The knowledge-creating company, Harvard Business Review, November–December (1991) 96– 104.
36.
[36] N. Ford , Information retrieval and creativity: towards support for the original thinker , Journal of Documentation55(5) (1999) 528–542 .
37.
[37] B. Hoyt , Early warning: the art of inference , Competitive Intelligence Magazine5(1) January–February (2002) 10– 14 .
38.
[38] R. Salmon and Y. de Linares , Competitive Intelligence: Scanning the Global Environment ( Economica, London , 1999) p. 99-99.
39.
[39] E. Bonabeau , Predicting the unpredictable, Harvard Business Review March (2002) 109–116.
40.
[40] R. Mathews and W. Wacker , The Deviant’s Advantage: how fringe ideas create mass markets ( Random House Business Books, London , 2003).
