The effects of topic complexity and familiarity on cognitive and physical moves in a thesaurus-enhanced search environment

Abstract

This paper presents an evaluation of the effects of search topic characteristics on cognitive and physical search moves within the interface of a thesaurus-enhanced information retrieval environment. Topic characteristics examined here are topic complexity, topic familiarity, search type and prior topic search experience. The data gathering techniques adopted in this investigation included pre- and post-search questionnaires, transaction logs and post-session interviews. Thirty academic staff and postgraduate researchers from the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine at the University of Glasgow participated in this study. Each participant conducted three searches based on their research information needs. The results show that complex topics are associated with significantly more cognitive and physical moves. However, it is perhaps equally important to note that the results indicate that variation in the other topic characteristics did not demonstrate any significant difference in the number of cognitive or physical moves.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

[1] M. Beaulieu, Experiments of interfaces to support query expansion , Journal of Documentation 53(1) (1997) 8–19 .

[2] G. Brajnik, S. Mizzaro and C. Tasso, Evaluating user interfaces to information retrieval systems: a case study on user support. In: Proceedings of the 19th Annual International ACM/SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, ( Hartung-Gorre Verlag Konstanz, Germany , 1996), pp. 128–136.

[3] R. Fidel, Searchers’ selection of search keys: III. Searching styles , Journal of the American Society for Information Science 42(7) (1991) 515–527 .

[4] A. Shiri, C. Revie and G. Chowdhury, Thesaurusenhanced search interfaces . Journal of Information Science 28(2) (2002) 111–122 .

[5] E.N. Efthimiadis, Interactive query expansion: a userbased evaluation in a relevance feedback environment , Journal of the American Society for Information Science 51(12) (2000) 1–25 .

[6] I. Hsieh-Yee, Effects of search experience and subject knowledge on the search tactics of novice and experienced searchers , Journal of the American Society for Information Science 44(3) (1993) 161–174 .

[7] A.G. Sutcliffe, M. Ennis, and S.J. Watkinson, Empirical studies of end-user information searching , Journal of the American Society for Information Science 51(13) (2000) 1211–1231 .

[8] P. Vakkari, Cognition and changes of search terms and tactics during task performance: a longitudinal case study. In: RIAO 2000 Content-based Multimedia Information Access, Paris (12–14 April 2000), pp. 894–907.

[9] A. Spink, Term relevance feedback and mediated database searching: implications for information retrieval practice and systems design , Information Processing and Management 31(2) (1994) 161–171 .

10.

[10] A. Spink and T. Saracevic, Interaction in information retrieval: selection and effectiveness of search terms , Journal of the American Society for Information Science 48(8) (1997) 741–761 .

11.

[11] R. Fidel, Searchers’ selection of search keys: III . Searching styles, Journal of the American Society for Information Science 42(7) (1991) 515–527 .

12.

[12] S. Jones, M. Gatford, S. Robertson, M. Hancock-Beaulieu, J. Secker and S. Walker, Interactive thesaurus navigation: intelligence rules Ok? Journal of the American Society for Information Science 46(1) (1995) 52–59 .

13.

[13] C.F. McMath,, R.S. Tamaru and R. Rada, A graphical thesaurus-based information retrieval system , International Journal of Man–Machine Studies 31 (1989) 121–147 .

14.

[14] M. Agosti, G. Gradenigo and P.G. Marchetti, A hypertext environment for interacting with large textual databases , Information Processing and Management 28(3) (1992) 371–387 .

15.

[15] N.J. Belkin, P.G. Marchetti and C. Cool, BRAQUE: design of an interface to support user interaction in information retrieval , Information Processing and Management 29(3) (1993) 325–344 .

16.

[16] E. Johnson and P. Cochrane, A hypertextual interface for a searcher’s thesaurus. In: Digital Libraries ‘95 : Proceedings of the Second Annual Conference on the Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries, Austin, TX (11–13 June 1995).

17.

[17] R. Pollard, A hypertext-based thesaurus as subject browsing aid for bibliographic database , Information Processing and Management 29(3) (1993) 345–357 .

18.

[18] A.S. Pollitt, G.P. Ellis and M.P. Smith, HIBROWSE for bibliographic databases , Journal of Information Science 20(6) (1994) 413–426 .

19.

[19] X. Lin, Visual MeSH . Proceedings of 22nd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and development in Information Retrieval, Berkeley, CA, 15–19 August 1999 (ACM, New York, 1999), pp. 317–318 .

20.

[20] M. Hearst and C. Karadi, Cat-a-Cone: an interactive interface for specifying searches and viewing retrieval results using a large category hierarchy. In: SIGIR ‘97 : Proceedings of the 20th Annual International ACM/ SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 27–31 July 1997 (ACM, New York, 1997), pp. 246–255 .

21.

[21] C. L. Borgman, S.G. Hirsh and J. Hiller, Rethinking online monitoring methods for information retrieval systems: from search product to search process Journal of the American Society for Information Science 47(7) (1996) 568–583 .

22.

[22] P. Hansen, User interface design for IR interaction: a task-oriented approach . In: T. Saracevic, P. Ingwersen and P. Vakkari (eds), CoLIS 3. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on the Conceptions of the Library and Information Science, Dubrovnik, Croatia (23–26 May 1999), pp. 191–205 .

23.

[23] K. Bystrom and K. Jarvelin, Task complexity affects information seeking and use , Information Processing and Management 31(2) (1995) 191–213 .

24.

[24] J. Kristensen, J. and K. Jarvelin, The impact of query structure and query expansion on retrieval performance . In: W.B. Croft, A. Moffat, C.J. van Rijsbergen, R. Wilkinson and J. Zobel (eds), SIGIR’98: Proceedings of the Association for Computing Machinery Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval (ACM/SIGIR) 21st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Melbourne (ACM Press, New York, 1998), pp. 130–137 .

25.

[25] B. Jansen, The effect of query complexity on Web searching results, Information Research, 6(1) Available at: http://InformationR.net/ir/6-1/paper87.html (2000).

26.

[26] T. Saracevic, P. Kantor, A. Chamis and D. Trivison, A study of information seeking and retrieving. I. background and methodology , Journal of the American Society for Information Science 39(3) (1988) 161–176 .

27.

[27] D. Kelly and C. Cool, The effects of topic familiarity on information search behaviour . In: Proceedings of Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL) (13–17 July 2002), pp. 74–77 .

28.

[28] A. Shiri, C. Revie and G. Chowdhury, Assessing the impact of user interaction with thesaural knowledge structures: a quantitative analysis framework . In: Challenges in Knowledge Representation and Organization for the 21st Century: Integration of Knowledge Across Boundaries: Proceedings of the 7th International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO) Conference, Granada, Spain (10–13 July 2002), pp. 493–499 .

29.

[29] C. Meadow, J. Wang and W. Yuan, A study of user performance and attitudes with information retrieval interfaces , Journal of the American Society for Information Science 46(7) (1995) 490–505 .

30.

[30] A.G. Sutcliffe, M. Ennis and S.J. Watkinson, Empirical studies of end-user information searching , Journal of the American Society for Information Science 51(13) (2000) 1211–1231 .

31.

[31] J. Greenberg, Optimal query expansion (QE) processing methods with semantically encoded structures thesauri terminology , Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 52(6) (2001) 487–498 .

32.

[32] P. Borlund and P. Ingwersen, The development of a method for the evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems , Journal of Documentation 53(3) (1997) 225–250 .

33.

[33] M. Bates, Information search tactics Journal of the American Society for Information Science 30(4) (1979) 205–214 .

34.

[34] R. Fidel, Moves in online searching , Online Review 9(1) (1985) 61–74 .

35.

[35] G. Marchionini, C. Meadow, S. Dwiggins, X. Lin, J. Wang and W. Yuan, A study of user interaction with information retrieval interfaces: progress report , The Canadian Journal of Information Science 16(4) (1991) 42–59 .

36.

[36] G. Marchionini, Information-seeking strategies of novices using a full-text electronic encyclopedia , Journal of the American Society for Information Science 40(1) (1989) 54–66 .

37.

[37] H. Fowkes and M. Beaulieu, Interactive searching behaviour: Okapi experiment for TREC-8 . In: The BCS/ IRSG 22nd Annual Colloquium on Information Retrieval Research, Cambridge (5–7 April 2000), pp. 47–56 .