The Internet culture is creating a new scientific communication system with new facilities that are competing with, and might replace, the present printed information sources. The use and non-use of these facilities by Nigerian academic scientists were investigated, using data collected from a survey of academic staff of selected disciplines in 10 universities. It was found that the scientists are still heavily dependent on printed information sources, especially journals, indexes and abstracts. The study reveals that 64.4% of them have a computer at their disposal, while 50.4% have access to, and are using, the Internet. Besides e-mail, very little use is made of other Internet facilities. Non-use of the Internet is attributable to problems of accessibility, ease of use and cost. Most of the non-users are aware of the information and communication potential of the Internet in their disciplines, and believe that the Internet will become indispensable in their research in the future.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
W.D. Garvey and B.C. Griffith , Communication and information processing within scientific disciplines: Empirical findings for psychology , Information Storage and Retrieval8 (1972) 123-126 .
2.
W.D. Garvey , N. Lin and C.E. Nelson , Communication in physical and social sciences. In: W.D. Garvey (ed.), Communication: the Essence of Science ( Pergamon, Oxford , 1979), pp. 280-299.
3.
F.A. Ehikhamenor , Aspects of the publication cycle of physical scientists in some Nigerian universities , Journal of Information Science16 (1990) 257-263 .
4.
J.D. Rogers , Internetworking and the politics of science: NSNET in Internet history , The Information Society14 (1998) 213-228 .
5.
M.J. Kovacs and D.K. Kovacs , The state of scholarly electronic conferencing , Electronic Networking: Research Applications and Policy1 (1991) 29-36 .
6.
M.T. Schaefermeyer and E.H. Sewell , Communicating by electronic mail , American Behavioral Scientist32 (1988) 112-123 .
7.
M.L. Mosier . The Internet as a reference tool: accessing scientific and technical information via the World Wide Web . In: The Internet: Flames, Firewalls and the Future. Proceedings for the 1995 Conference of the Council for Higher Education Computing Services (CHECS) (Roswell, NM, 8-10 November 1995).
8.
J. Tillotson , J. Cherry and M. Clinton , Internet use through the University of Toronto Library: demographics, destinations and users reactions , Information Technology and Libraries14 (1995) 190-198 .
9.
J. Rolinson , A. Meadows and H. Smith , Use of information technology by biological researchers , Journal of Information Science21(2) (1995) 133-139 .
10.
R. Savolainen , Use studies of electronic networks: a review of empirical research approaches and challenges for their development , Journal of Documentation54(3) (1998) 332-351 .
11.
H.J. Voorbij . Searching scientific information on the Internet: a Dutch academic user survey , Journal of the American Society for Information Science50(7) (1999) 598-615 .
12.
R. Kling and G. McKim , Scholarly communication and the continuum of electronic publishing , Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(10) (1999) 890-906 .
13.
M.D. Cooper , Usage patterns of a web-base library catalog , Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology52(2) (2001) 137-148 .
14.
Y. Zhang , Scholarly use of Internet-based electronic resources , Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology52(8) (2001) 628-654 .
15.
E. Abels , P. Liebscher and D. Denman , Factors that influence the use of electronic networks by science and engineering faculty at small institutions. Part 1. Queries , Journal of the American Society for Information Science47(2) (1996) 146-158 .
16.
D. Pullinger , Academics and the new information environments: the impact of local factors on use of electronic journals , Journal of Information Science25(2) (1999) 164-172 .
17.
C.L. Borgman , Digital libraries and the continuum of scholarly communication , Journal of Documentation56(4) (2000) 412-430 .
18.
D. Day , G. McKim , D. Orchard , A. Purcell , D. Wachsmann and E. Davenport , Agents for electronic document supply: who are the likely players?Aslib Proceedings45(7/8) (1993) 189-199 .
19.
S. Costa and J. Meadows , The impact of computer usage on scholarly communication among social scientists , Journal of Information Science26(4) (2000) 255-262 .
20.
C. McKnight , L. Yu , S. Harker and K. Phillips , Librarians in the delivery of journals: roles revisited , Journal of Librarianship and Information Science32(3) (2000) 117-134 .
21.
A. Mahe , C. Andrys and G. Chartron , How French research scientists are making use of electronic journals: a case study , Journal of Information Science26(5) (2000) 291-302 .
22.
S.P. Harter , Scholarly communication and electronic journals: an impact study , Journal of the American Society for Information Science49(6) (1998) 507-516 .
23.
D.L. Wiley , Will the Internet turn database producers into information providers?Business Information Alert8(9) (1996) 1-5 .
24.
R. Peek , J. Pomerantz and S. Paling , The traditional scholarly publishers legitimize the Web , Journal of the American Society for Information Science49(11) (1998) 983-989 .
25.
Reference Linking Service to Aid Scientists Conducting Online Research: Scientific and Scholarly Publishers Collaborate to Offer Ground-Breaking Initiative; www.academicpress.com/
26.
J.M. Hurd , Introduction and overview , Journal of the American Society for Information Science51(14) (2000) 1276-1278 .
27.
F.A. Ehikhamenor , Perceived state of science in Nigerian universities , Scientometrics13(5-6) (1988) 225-238 .
28.
P. Wei He , and T.E. Jacobson , What are they doing with the Internet? A study of user information seeking behaviors , Internet Reference Services Quarterly1(1), (1996) 31-51 .
29.
H. Bruce , User satisfaction with information seeking on the Internet , Journal of the American Society for Information Science49(6) (1998) 541-556 .
30.
J. K. MacKie-Mason and H. R. Varian , Economic FAQs about the Internet. In: L.W. McNight and J.P. Bailey (eds), Internet Economics ( The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA , 1997), pp. 27-62.
31.
C. Schwartz , Web search engines , Journal of the American Society for Information Science49(11) (1998) 973-982 .
32.
S.S. Lazinger , I. Barllan , and B.C. Peritz , Internet use by faculty in various disciplines: a comparative case study , Journal of the American Society for Information Science48 (1997) 508-518 .
33.
J.P. Walsh and T. Bayma , Computer networks and scientific work , Social Studies of Science26 (1996) 661-703 .
34.
R. Kling and G. McKim . Not just a matter of time: field differences and she shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication , Journal of the American Society for Information Science51(14) (2000) 1306-1320 .
35.
L.M. Covi , Material mastery: situating digital library use in university research practices , Information Processing and Management35 (May 1999), 293-316 .
36.
Data page: use of the Internet by scientists . Digital Publishing Strategies1(7) (March 1997) 14 . [From American Library Association, Machine-Assisted Reference Section Current User Research Bibliography, Working List; last update 31 July 2000; www.ala.org/education/index.html]
37.
H. Blume , Open Science Online , The American Prospect11 (10), (27 March-10 April 2000). Available at: www.prospect.org/
38.
C. M. Brown , Information seeking behavior of scientists in the electronic information age: Astronomers, chemists, mathematicians, and physicists , Journal of the American Society for Information Science50(10) (1999) 929-943 .
39.
Re-engineering peer review , The Economist (339 June 22) (1996) 78-79 .
40.
C. Brown , The evolution of preprints in the scholarly communication of physicists and astronomers , Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology52(3) (2001) 187-200 .
41.
R.G. Weiner , The Internet Culture: Transitions and Problems (1996), 14 pp.
42.
C. Griffith , Multimedia and the importance of books , Information Today14(1) 13 and 17 .
43.
W. White . Report of the Meeting on Tools for Ending Scientific Isolation: the WWW and Beyond (30 September-1 October 1996). Sponsored by the Office of International Affairs.
44.
P.G. Gerstberger and T.J. Allen , Criteria used by research and development engineers in the selection of an information source , Journal of Applied Psychology54(4) (1968) 272-279 .
45.
M.J. Culnan , The dimensions of perceived accessibility to information: implications for the delivery of information systems and services , Journal of the American Society for Information Science36 (1985) 302-308 .
46.
M. Slater , Types of use and users in industrial libraries: some impressions , Journal of Documentation19(March) (1963) 12-18 .
47.
T. Allen , Information flow in research and development laboratories , Administrative Science Quarterly14 (March) (1969) 12-19 .
48.
V. Rosenberg , Factors affecting the preferences of industrial personnel for information gathering methods , Information Storage and Retrieval3 (1967) 119-127 .
49.
J.B. Harris , Tailoring telecommunications innovations to fit educational environments , Educational Technology29 (November 1989) 7-11 .
50.
D. Nicholas and D. Fenton , The Internet and the changing information environment , Managing Information4 (January-February) (1997) 29-32 .
51.
Guidelines for E-Publishing for the DC Community; www.cityu.edu.hk/is/itdc/itdc.htm
52.
D.D. King , Some economic aspects of the Internet , Journal of the American Society for Information Science49(11) (1998) 990-1002 .
53.
C. J. Kenny , Expanding Internet access to the rural poor in Africa , Information Technology for Development9 (2000) 25-31 .
54.
D. Nahl , Learning the Internet and the structure of information behavior , Journal of the American Society for Information Science49(11) (1998) 1017-1023 .
