This study considers what factors influence whether decision-makers in an organization will accept a decision aid. Specifically, the study considered the information gathering and planning systems used to support resource allocation decisions in a higher education college. The main finding was that the aid was accepted due to the college’s ability to sustain an earlier pattern of resource allocation. Also the external funding process left the college with limited choice in how it organized its internal procedures. This combination of an external constraint and the ability to sustain an existing set of choices led to differences of opinion being played down and, as a result, the decision aid continuing to be used despite disagreement with both its structure and the resultant resource allocation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
[1] L.R. Beach , Image Theory: Decision Making in Personal and Organizational Contexts ( John Wiley, Chichester , 1990).
2.
[2] S.R. Watson , The presumption of prescription. In: O. Huber , J. Mumpower , J. van der Pligt and P. Koele (eds), Current Themes in Psychological Decision Research ( North Holland, Amsterdam , 1992).
3.
[3] R. Cook, Are Cognitive and Social Factors sufficient to explain the Acceptance of Decision Aiding Processes within Organisations? (Unpublished PhD thesis, Open University Business School, 2001).
4.
[4] D. Timmermans and C. Vlek , Multi-attribute decision support and complexity: an evaluation and process analysis of aided versus unaided decision making. In: O. Huber , J. Mumpower , J. van der Pligt and P. Koele (eds), Current Themes in Psychological Decision Research ( North Holland, Amsterdam , 1992).
5.
[5] R. Brown and A. Vari , Towards a research agenda for prescriptive decision science: the normative tempered by the descriptive. In: O. Huber , J. Mumpower , J. van der Pligt and P. Koele (eds), Current Themes in Psychological Decision Research ( North Holland, Amsterdam , 1992).
6.
[6] S.Y. Chan , The use of graphs as decision aids in relation to information overload and managerial decision quality , Journal of Information Science27(6) (2001) 427-438 .
7.
[7] J.H. Kerstholt and J.G.W. Raaijmakers , Decision making in dynamic task environments. In: R. Ranyard , W.R. Crozier and O. Svenson (eds), Decision Making: Cognitive Models and Explanations ( Routledge, London , 1997).
8.
[8] J.G. March , A Primer on Decision Making: How Decisions Happen ( Free Press, New York , 1994).
9.
[9] J.W. Payne , J.R. Bettman and E.J. Johnson , The Adaptive Decision Maker ( Cambridge University Press, Cambridge , 1993).
10.
[10] L.R. Beach , H. Jungermann and E.E.J. De Bruyn , Imagination and planning. In: L.R. Beach (ed.), Decision Making in the Workplace: a Unified Perspective ( Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey , 1996).
11.
[11] B. Rohrmann , Evaluating the usefulness of decision aids: a methodological perspective. In: B. Brehmer , H. Junger-mann , P. Lourens and G. Suvón (eds), New Directions in Research on Decision Making ( North Holland, Amsterdam , 1986).
12.
[12] G.E. Kersten and G.R. Mallory , Supporting problem representations in decisions with strategic interactions , European Journal of Operations Research46 (1990) 200-215 .
13.
[13] S. Alter , Why persist with DSS when the real issue is improving decision making? In: T. Jelassi , M.R. Klein , and W.M. Mayon-White (eds), Decision Support Systems: Experiences and Expectations ( IFIP Transactions, Amsterdam , 1992).
14.
[14] K. van der Heijden , Scenarios: the Art of Strategic Conversation ( John Wiley, Chichester , 1996).
15.
[15] R.K. Reger and T.B. Palmer , Managerial categorisation of competitors: using old maps to navigate new environments , Organisational Science7 (1996) 22-39 .
16.
[16] R.K. Reger , Managerial thought structures and competitive positioning. In: A.S. Huff (ed.), Mapping Strategic Thought ( John Wiley, Chichester , 1990).
17.
[17] K. Daniels , G. Johnson and L. de Chernatony , Differences in managerial cognitions of competition , British Journal of Management (Special Issue) 5 (1994) 21-29 .
18.
[18] P. Hodgkinson , The cognitive analysis of competitive structures: a review and a critique , Human Relations50(6) (1997) 625-654 .
19.
[19] R.K. Yin , Case Study Research: Design and Methods ( Sage, London , 1994).
20.
[20] M. Jenkins , The theory and practice of comparing causal maps. In: C. Eden and J.C. Spender (eds), Managerial and Organizational Cognition: Theory, Methods and Research ( Sage, London , 1998).
