This paper explores frame theory as a tool for making the value systems that underpin our understandings of information policy more explicit. Some empirical evidence is presented which suggests that the dominant discourse in information policy has been framed by political economy. The limitations of the political economy frame are considered, particularly in the light of alternative, non-market, conceptions of information, and the emergence of human rights legislation. These issues are discussed with special reference to aspects of copyright law, including moral rights, principles of proportionality and fairness, and rewards for creativity. Finally, the implications for policy makers are considered, notably the tendency to Popperian incrementalism and its ability to accommodate paradigm shifts.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
[1] I. Rowlands , Understanding information policy: concepts, frameworks and research tools , Journal of Information Science22(1) (1996) 13-25 .
2.
[2] C. Oppenheim , An agenda for action to achieve the information society in the UK , Journal of Information Science22(6) (1996) 407-421 .
3.
[3] S. Braman , The unique characteristics of information policy and their US consequences. In: V. Blake and R. Tsoumas (eds), Information Literacies for the Twenty-first Century ( Hill, Boston , 1990), pp. 47-77.
4.
[4] P. Turner , Overview [of information policy concepts]. In: I. Rowlands (ed.), Understanding Information Policy ( Bowker-Saur, London , 1997), pp. 19-26.
5.
[5] D.A. Schon and M. Rein , Frame Reflection: Towards a Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies ( Basic Books, New York , 1994).
6.
[6] J. Rose , The Intellectual Life of the British Working Classes ( Yale University Press, New Haven , 2001).
7.
[7] I. Rowlands , Some compass bearings for information policy orienteering , Aslib Proceedings50(8) (1999) 230-237 .
8.
[8] P. Hernon and H.C. Relyea , Information policy. In: A. Kent and H. Lacour (eds), Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science ( Dekker, New York , 1968).
9.
[9] N. Moore , Neo-liberal or dirigiste? Policies for an information society. In: I. Rowlands (ed.), Understanding Information Policy ( Bowker-Saur, London , 1997), pp. 89-100.
10.
[10] S. Braman , Defining information: an approach for policymakers , Telecommunications Policy13(3) (1989) 233-242 .
11.
[11] S. Roivas , Citizenship in the Information Society,Department of Social Policy, University of Tampere (www.uta.fi/laitokset/seminars/rights/roivas.htm, accessed 12 October 2001).
12.
[12] UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act (CDPA 88), Sections 77-84.
13.
[13] UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act (CDPA 88), Sections 79-92.
14.
[14] UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act (CDPA 88), Section 87.
15.
[15] Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, Article 6 bis, latest amendment Paris, 1971 (WIPO, Geneva, 1886).
16.
[16] UK Patents Act (PA 77), Section 13.
17.
[17] UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act (CDPA 88), Section 16(3a).
18.
[18] Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, Article 9(2), latest amendment Paris, 1971 (WIPO, Geneva, 1886).
19.
[19] Kern River Gas Transmission Co vs Coastal Corporation 1990, 899 F.2d.1458 (5th Cir 1990). Cited in: G. Cho, Geographic Information Systems and the Law (John Wiley, Chichester, 1998), pp. 194-195.
20.
[20] UK Patents Act (PA 77), Section 60(5a, b).
21.
[21] J. Ziman , Down which river is academic science being sold?Conference paper presented at Corruption of Scientific Integrity, British Academy, London (2 May 2001).
22.
[22] K.R. Popper , The Open Society and its Enemies, 5th edn ( Routledge & Kegan Paul, London , 1966).
23.
[23] M. Jarvie and S. Pralong (eds), Popper’s Open Society After Fifty Years ( Routledge, London , 1999).
24.
[24] M.A. Notturno , Science and the Open Society: The Future of Karl Popper’s Philosophy ( Central European Press, Budapest , 2000).
25.
[25] L. Robinson and D. Bawden , Libraries, information and knowledge in open societies , Nordinfonytt2 (2000) 21-30 .
26.
[26] L. Robinson and D. Bawden , Libraries and open society: Popper, Soros and digital information , Aslib Proceedings53(5) (2000) 167-178 .
27.
[27] W. Parsons , Public Policy: an Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis ( Edward Elgar, Aldershot , 1995).
28.
[28] M. Browne , The field of information policy: (1) Fundamental concepts , Journal of Information Science23(4) (1997) 261-275 .
29.
[29] D.R. Swanson , Evolution, libraries and national information policy , Library Quarterly50(1) (1980) 76-93 .
30.
[30] D. Bawden , The nature of prediction and the information future: Arthur C. Clarkes’s Odyssey vision , Aslib Proceedings49(3) (1997) 57-60 .
