The valuation of knowledge, and hence the assessment of the usefulness of approaches and programmes for managing knowledge, is a difficult, yet vital, task. This paper reviews some recent approaches, setting them in a context of wider philosophical and pragmatic issues. It identifies some paradoxical qualities of information and knowledge at the heart of this topic, and considers their implications.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
[1] C. Holtham , Valuation has its price , Library Association Record103(4) (2001) 232-233 .
2.
[2] J.J. Eaton and D. Bawden , What kind of resource is information? , International Journal of Information Management11(2) (1991) 156-165 .
3.
[3] D. Bawden , What kind of resource is information? , Computer Bulletin4(2) (1992) 6-7 .
4.
[4] D. Bawden , The shifting terminologies of information , Aslib Proceedings53(3) (2001) 93-98 .
5.
[5] C.T. Meadow and W. Yuan , Measuring the impact of information: defining the concepts , Information Processing and Management33(6) (1997) 697-714 .
6.
[6] P. Checkland and S. Holwell , Information, Systems and Information Systems - Making Sense of the Field ( Wiley, Chichester , 1998), Chapter 4.
7.
[7] E. Orna and C. Pettitt , Information Management in Museums, 2nd edn ( Gower, Aldershot , 1998), Chapter 2.
8.
[8] B.C. Brookes , The foundations of information science. Part 1: philosophical aspects , Journal of Information Science2 (1980) 125-133 .
9.
[9] N.J. Belkin , The cognitive viewpoint in information science , Journal of Information Science16 (1990) 11-15 .
10.
[10] K. Popper , Objective Knowledge, revised edition ( Oxford University Press, Oxford , 1979), Chapters 3 and 4.
11.
[11] D. Bawden , Information policy or knowledge policy. In: I. Rowlands (ed.), Understanding Information Policy ( Bowker Saur, London , 1997), pp. 74-80.
12.
[12] M. Polanyi , Personal Knowledge ( Routledge and Kegan Paul, London , 1958).
13.
[13] M. Polanyi , The Tacit Dimension ( Doubleday, Garden City, New York , 1966).
14.
[14] M. Polanyi , The tacit dimension. In: L. Prusak (ed.), Knowledge in Organizations ( Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, MA , 1997), pp. 135-146.
15.
[15] J.-A. Johannessen , J. Olaisen and B. Olsen , Mismanagement of tacit knowledge: the importance of tacit knowledge, the danger of information technology, and what to do about it , International Journal of Information Management21(1) (2001) 3-20 .
16.
[16] D. Bawden , Knowledge management: old solutions for new problems? , ASSIG nation16(1) (1998) 10-12 .
17.
[reprinted in R.L. Ruggles (ed.), Knowledge Management Tools ( Butterworth-Heinnemann, Boston, MA , 1997), pp. 79-101].
18.
[18] R. Davies , The creation of new knowledge by information retrieval and classification , Journal of Documentation, 45(4) (1989) 273-301 .
19.
[19] N. Ford , Information retrieval and creativity: towards support for the original thinker , Journal of Documentation55(5) (1999) 528-542 .
20.
[20] D. Streatfield and T. Wilson , Deconstructing ‘knowledge management’ , Aslib Proceedings51(3) (1999) 67-71 .
21.
[21] R.S. Taylor , Value-added Processes in Information Systems ( Ablex, Norwod, NJ , 1986).
22.
[22] D. Bawden , Value added information systems and services , Perspectives in Information Management2 (1990) 157-180 .
23.
[23] P.K. McPherson , Accounting for the value of information , Aslib Proceedings46(9) (1994) 203-215 .
24.
[24] J. Stenson , R.M.S. Wilson and C. OppenheimC, Valuation of Information Assets, Loughborough University Business School Research Series Paper 2000:2, Library and Information Commission Research Report 33 (2000).
25.
[25] KPMG , Information as an Asset: the Board Agenda (Hawley Report) ( KPMG Impact Group, London , 1994).
26.
[26] J. Stenson , R.M.S. Wilson and C. Oppenheim , The Valuing of Information Assets in UK Companies, Loughborough University Business School Research Series Paper 2000:3, Library and Information Commission Research Report 80 (2000).
27.
[27] P. Strassmann , The Economics and Politics of Information Management (June 1996) Available at: www.strassmann.com/pubs/econ-polim.html (accessed on 31 May 2001).
28.
[28] K.E. Sveiby , Frequently Asked Questions (January 2000). Available at: www.sveiby.com.au/FAQ.htm (accessed on 2 April 2001).
29.
[29] P.A. Strassmann , The Value Proposition: IP - A New Metric for the Information Age (January 2000). Available at: www.strassmann.com/pubs/ip-value-proposition.html (accessed on 6 August 2001).
30.
[30] T. Powell , Valuation of intellectual capital. In: CBI/IBM, Liberating Knowledge (Business Guide) ( Caspian Publishing Ltd, London , no date).
31.
[31] T.A. Stewart , Intellectual Capital ( Nicholas Brealey Publishing, London , 1998).
32.
[32] F.J. Contractor , Valuing corporate knowledge and intangible assets: some general principles , Knowledge and Process Management7(4) (2000) 242-255 .
33.
[33] Centre for Business Performance , Measuring capabilities and knowledge in the eEconomy (undated). Available at: www.cranfield.ac.uk/som/cbp/measuringcapabilities.html (accessed on 10 May 2001).
34.
[34] A. Neely and C. Adams , Perspectives on Performance: the Performance Prism (undated). Available at: www.cranfield.ac.uk/som/cbp/prismarticle.pdf (accessed on 3 August 2001).
35.
[35] F. Foster , Justifying knowledge management investments , Knowledge and Process Management6(3) (1999) 154-157 .
36.
[36] KPMG Consulting , eWorkforce: Turning Knowledge into Value, Available at: www.kpmgconsulting.co.uk/kpmgsite/research/othermedia/wf8_know.pdf (accessed 6 August 2001).
37.
[37] D.J. Skyrme , New metrics: does it all add up? In: C. Despres and D. Chauvel (eds), Knowledge Horizons: the Present and the Promise of Knowledge Management ( Butterworth-Heinemann , 2000), pp. 307-323.
38.
[38] P. Murray , Designing for business benefits from knowledge management. In: C. Despres and D. Chauvel (eds), Knowledge Horizons: the Present and the Promise of Knowledge Management ( Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston , 2000), pp. 171-194.
39.
[39] Cranfield University , The Cap Gemini/Cranfield Intranet Study: Intranet Benchmarking and Business Value, Summary Report ( Cap Gemini UK plc , 1999).
40.
[40] A. Andersen and The American Productivity and Quality Center , The Knowledge Management Assessment Tool: External Benchmarking Version (Winter 1996).
41.
[41] D. Young , An audit tale, CIO Magazine 1 May 2000. Available at: www.cio.com/archive/ (accessed 02 July 2001).
42.
[42] G. Coult and G. Smith , Knowledge management: preparation and measurement, Part 1 ; Managing Information7(9) (2000) 65-66 .
43.
[43] P.H. Gray , The effects of knowledge management systems on emergent teams: towards a research model , Journal of Strategic Information Systems9(2-3) (2000) 175-191 .
44.
[44] C.W. Holsapple and K.D. Joshi , An investigation of factors that influence the management of knowledge in organisations , Journal of Strategic Information Systems9(2-3) (2000) 235-261 .
45.
[45] D.A. Garvin , Building a learning organisation. In: Harvard Business Review on Knowledge Management ( Harvard Business Review , 1998) pp. 47-80.
46.
[46] R. Hull , R. Coombs and M. Peltu , Knowledge management practices for innovation: an audit tool for improvement , International Journal of Technology Management20(5-8) (2000) 633-656 .
47.
[47] D. Skyrme , Measuring Intellectual Capital: a Plethora of Methods, 1997. Available at: www.skyrme.com/insights/24kmeas.htm (accessed on 24 November 2000).
48.
[48] K.E. Sveiby , Methods of Measuring Intangible Assets (April 2001). Available at: www.sveiby.com.au/IntangibleMethods.htm (accessed on 30 May 2001).
49.
[49] W.J. Martin , Approaches to the measurement of the impact of knowledge management programmes , Journal of Information Science26(1) (2000) 21-27 .
50.
[50] A. Yakhlef and M. Salzer-Moerling , Intellectual capital: managing by numbers. In: C. Prichard , R. Hull , M. Chumer and H. Willmott (eds), Managing Knowledge: Critical Investigations of Work and Learning, ( Macmillan Press, Basingstoke , 2000), pp. 20-36.
51.
[51] R.S. Norton and D.P. Kaplan , The Balanced Scorecard ( Harvard Business School Press, Boston1996).
52.
[52] K.E. Sveiby , The Intangible Assets Monitor (December 1997). Available at: www.sveiby.com.au/IntangAss/CompanyMonitor.html (accessed on 30 May 2001).
53.
[53] K.E. Sveiby , The Balanced ScoreCard (BSC) and the Intangible Assets Monitor - a Comparison (April 2001) Available at: www.sveiby.com.au/IntangAss/BSCandIAM.html (accessed on 25 April 2001).
54.
[54] Skandia , Skandia Navigator Available at: www.skandia.com/capital/navigator/htm (accessed on 21 May 2001).
55.
[55] E. Truch , Mapping advances KM journey , Knowledge Management (April 2001) 33 .
56.
[56] L. Prusak , Making knowledge visible. In: D.A. Marchand and T.H. Davenport (eds) FT Mastering Information Management ( Financial Times/Prentice-Hall, London , 2000), pp. 182-185.
57.
[57] C. Hartz , S. Sammis , J. Hofer-Alfeis , K. Lopez , C. Raybourn and J.N. Wilson , Measurement for Knowledge Management ( American Productivity and Quality Center , February 2001). Available at: www.apqc.org/free/articles/dispArticle.cfm?ProductID=1307 (accessed on 2 August 2001).
58.
[58] L. Smith , Knowledge Management Metrics - a Learning Process. (undated, posted 1999). Available at: www.zigonperf.com/resources/pmnews/knowledgemetrics.html (accessed 1 August 2001).
59.
published in Communication Technology Decisions1 (Autumn/Winter 1999/2000).
60.
[60] P. Rajah , Executive Insights: Knowledge Management: Still in an Embryonic State, And IDC Research paper in association with Cap Gemini ( International Data Corporation ; www.capgemini.com).
