Derived from actual librarians’ e-mail replies to clients’ queries, this study investigated the clients’ understanding of technical terms commonly used by librarians during reference interviews. Two sample groups of clients were used for the study. The first group consisted of clientele of the National Reference Library of Singapore. The second group, comprising acquaintances of the staff from the Library Support Services of the National Library Board of Singapore, might be potential or actual library clients. The participants were asked to complete a multiple-choice questionnaire, consisting of 20 technical terms, each accompanied by one correct and three incorrect definition options. The findings revealed that the participants were able to define the technical terms correctly three-quarters of the time. However, 65% of the participants faced difficulty in defining at least one technical term. The reasons underlying the participants’ choices included the appearance of the term in the chosen option and greater familiarity with the selected definition. The methods that were frequently used by the participants to derive the answers were guessing and knowing the meaning in another context. It is recommended that librarians adopt a balanced approach towards the use of technical terms when communicating with clients. While there is no need to refrain from using technical language totally, librarians should exercise discretion and care when communicating.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
[1] D.J. Parus , The reference interview: communication and the patron . The Katherine Sharp Review [online], (1996) (2). Available from: edfu.lis.uiuc.edu/review/winter1996/parus.html (access date: 11 August 1998).
2.
[2] P. Dewdney and G. Michell , Oranges and peaches: communication accidents in the reference interview . Reference Quarterly35(4) (1986) 520-536 .
3.
[3] B. Albsmeyer , Barriers to good reference service . Illinois Libraries73(6) (1991) 529-531 .
4.
[4] D. Issacson , Pleasures and pitfalls that can make or break a reference encounter . The Reference Librarian59 (1997) 59-65 .
5.
[5] E.G. Abels , The e-mail reference interview . Reference Quarterly35(3) (1996) 345-358 .
6.
[6] L.C. Peterson , Effective question negotiation in the reference interview . Current Studies in Librarianship21(1-2) (1997) 22-34 .
7.
[7] T. Hoskisson , Making the right assumptions: know your user and improve the reference interview . The Reference Librarian59 (1997) 67-75 .
8.
[8] R.S. Taylor , Question-negotiation and information seeking in libraries . College and Research Libraries29 (1968) 182-183 .
9.
[9] D. Dillon , Some straight talk (and a few lies) at the reference desk . Wilson Library Bulletin61(6) (1987) 23-25 .
10.
[10] M.L. Radford , Communication theory applied to the reference encounter: an analysis of critical incidents . The Library Quarterly66(2) (1996) 123-137 .
11.
[11] R. Naismith and J. Stein , Library jargon: student comprehension of technical language used by librarians . College and Research Libraries50(5) (1989) 543-552 .
12.
[12] J. Stevenson , Dictionary of Library and Information Management, Peter Collin: Cambridge (1997).
13.
[13] Association of College and Research Libraries and American Library Association Instruction Section [online]. Available from: www.lib.utexas.edu/is/ (access date: 14 February 1999).
14.
[14] University of Florida Glossary or Library Lingo [on-line]. Available from: nervm.nerdc.ufl.edu/%7Ehsswww/instruct/glossar.html (access date: 14 February 1999).
15.
[15] Thomas G.Carpenter Library Library Glossary [on-line]. Available from: nervm.nerdc.ufl.edu/%7Ehsswww/instruct/glossary.html (access date: 14 February 1999).
