Webometric analysis of departments of librarianship and information science

Abstract

This paper describes a webometric analysis of the linkages (or ‘sitations’) to websites associated with departments of librarianship and information science (LIS). Some of the observed sitation counts appear counter-intuitive and there is only a very limited correlation with peer evaluations of research performance, with many of the sitations being from pages that are far removed in subject matter from LIS. Our conclusions are that sitation data are not well suited to the quantitative evaluation of the research status of LIS departments and that departments can best boost their web visibility by hosting as wide a range of types of material as possible.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

[1] E. Garfield , Citation Indexing: Its Theory and Applications in Science, Technology and the Humanities ( Wiley, New York , 1979).

[2] B. Cronin , The Citation Process: the Role and Significance of Citations in Scientific Communication ( Taylor Graham, London , 1984).

[3] M. Liu , The complexities of citation practice: a review of citation studies , Journal of Documentation 49 (1993) 370-408 .

[4] L.M. Baird and C. Oppenheim , Do citations matter? Journal of Information Science 20 (1994) 2-15 .

[5] B. Cronin and K. Overfeld , Citation-based auditing of academic performance , Journal of the American Society for Information Science 45 (1994) 64-72 .

[6] C. Oppenheim , The correlation between citation counts and the 1992 research assessment exercise ratings for British research in genetics, anatomy and archaeology , Journal of Documentation 53 (1997) 417-487 .

[7] S.J. Bradley , P. Willett and F.E. Wood , A publication and citation analysis of the Department of Information Studies, University of Sheffield, 1980-1990 , Journal of Information Science 18 (1991) 225-232 .

[8] L.B. Seng and P. Willett , The citedness of publications by United Kingdom library schools , Journal of Information Science 21 (1994) 68-71 .

[9] C. Oppenheim , The correlation between citation counts and the 1992 research assessment exercise ratings for British library and information science university departments , Journal of Documentation 51 (1995) 18-27 .

10.

[10] R. Rousseau , Sitations: An Exploratory Study. Available at URL: http://www.cindoc.csic.es/cybermetrics/articles/vol1iss1.html (site visited 16 May 2000).

11.

[11] T.C. Almind and P. Ingwersen , Informetric analyses on the World Wide Web: methodological approaches to ‘Webometrics’ , Journal of Documentation 53 (1997) 404-426 .

12.

[12] R.R. Larson , Bibliometrics of the World Wide Web: an exploratory analysis of the intellectual structure of cyberspace . In: S. Hardin (ed.), Global Complexity: Information, Chaos and Control. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Conference of the American Society for Information Science (American Society for Information Science, Baltimore, MD, 1996).

13.

[13] P. Ingwersen , The calculation of web impact factors , Journal of Documentation 54 (1998) 236-243 .

14.

[14] B. Cronin , H.W. Snyder , H. Rosenbaum , A. Martinson and E. Callahan , Invoked on the web , Journal of the American Society for Information Science 49 (1998) 1319-1328 .

15.

[15] H. Snyder and H. Rosenbaum , Can search engines be used as tools for Web-link analysis? A critical review , Journal of Documentation 55 (1999) 375-384 .

16.

[16] A.G. Smith , A tale of two Web search spaces: comparing sites using Web impact factors , Journal of Documentation 55 (1999) 577-592 .

17.

[17] M. Thelwall , Web impact factors and search engine coverage , Journal of Documentation 56 (2000) 185-189 .

18.

[18] O. Thomas, Bibliometrics of the WWW: An Exploratory Study of the Web Presence of LIS Schools (MSc dissertation) (University of Sheffield, 1999).

19.

[19] J. Elkin and D. Law , The 1996 Research Assessment Exercise: the Library and Information Management Panel , Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 29 (1997) 131-141 .

20.

[20] S. Nicholson , Raising reliability of Web search tool research through replication and chaos theory , Journal of the American Society for Information Science 51 (2000) 724-729 .

21.

[21] R. Rousseau , Daily Time Series of Common Single Word Searches in AltaVista and NorthernLight. Available at URL: http://www.cindoc.csic.es/cybermetrics/vol2iss1.html (site visited 5 August 2000).

22.

[22] J.M. Budd and C.A. Seavey , Productivity of US library and information science faculty: the Hayes study revisited , Library Quarterly 66 (1996) 1-20 .

23.

[23] L. Leydesdorff , Theories of citation? Scientometrics 43 (1998) 5-25 .

24.

[24] D.O. Case and G.M. Higgins , How can we investigate citation behaviour? A study of reasons for citing literature in communication , Journal of the American Society for Information Science 51 (2000) 635-645 .

25.

[25] S. Lawrence and C.L. Giles , Accessibility of information on the Web , Nature 400 (1999) 107-109 .

26.

[26] Available at URL: http://www.isinet.com

27.

[27] Available at URL: http://www.scit.wlv.ac.uk/ukinfo/uk.map.html

28.

[28] Available at URL: http://www.shef.ac.uk/%7Eis/publications/worldlist/wlist1.html

29.

[29] Private communication from the AltaVista online support team to O. Thomas on 12 May 1999, stating that the search engine returns an approximation of results, with the best recall being obtained between 0300 and 1300 hours Greenwich Mean Time (GMT).

30.

[30] Available at URL: http://www.niss.ac.uk/education/hefc/rae96/1_96/t61.html