Abstract
Perceived control over school performances is often assessed by means of attributions of performance to "controllable" or "non-controllable" causes. We assume that this assessment method is not reliable, because it is not possible to make a general distinction between controllable and non-controllable causes. Both developmental level and experience influence the perceived controllability of the causes. Also external attributions may be perceived as controllable. Our hypotheses are: (1) that children frequently perceive failures caused by "lack of competence", "task difficulty", and "insufficient explanation by the teacher" as controllable; and (2) that children with problems in learning and concentration perceive failures caused by "effort" as non-improvable more often than control children. Both hypotheses are confirmed. This implies that assessing perceived control by assessing attributions for school performances is not a reliable method. In addition, attribution-training should not focus merely on increasing the rate of attributions to "controllable" causes, but also on the translation of these "controllable" attributions to concrete behaviour.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
