Abstract
Two studies investigated the maintenance of a memory strategy following training. Maintenance was compared in two groups of preschoolers. The first group was taught the strategy in a situation where it produced large improvements in performance from pretrials to training. These children were more likely to maintain it than those taught the strategy in a situation in which improvements were small. It was concluded that the size of the improvement in memory was a determinant of strategy maintenance, although the second study showed that the size of the improvement did not influence transfer of the strategy to a different task. The implications of this finding are discussed in relation to other intervention studies in memory development, and to young children's ability to monitor their own memory performance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
