Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Previous research has found that young children characteristically draw what they know rather than what they see; they do not routinely draw viewercentred representations. The aim of the first experiment was to investigate the way subjects represent one object totally occluded by another. Although some of the younger children included what they could not see, most subjects aged 5 to 9 years and adults drew only what they could see. There was also a tendency among the younger children to differentiate in their drawings between the inside and the behind relationships in the scene. The second experiment investigated the subjects' interpretation of the main types of picture produced in experiment 1 by asking them to arrange the objects as they would have appeared to the artist. Most subjects matched their view of the objects to that shown in the picture, but the picture did not necessarily elicit the same object arrangement in experiment 2 as the artist in experiment 1 had seen.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bremner, J. G. (1985). Provoked use of height in picture as a depth cue in young children's drawings . British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 3, 95-98 .

Clark, A. (1897). The child's attitude towards perspective problems. In E. Barnes (Ed.), Studies in education, Vol. 1. Stanford: Stanford University Press .

Cox, M. V. (1978). Spatial depth relationships in young children's drawings . Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 26, 551-554 .

Cox, M. V. (1981). One thing behind another: Problems of representation in children's drawings . Educational Psychology, 1, 275-287 .

Cox, M. V. (1985). One object behind another: children's use of array-specific or view-specific representations. In N. H. Freeman & M. V. Cox (Eds), Visual order: The nature and development ofpictorial representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

Davis, A. M. (1983). Contextual sensitivity in young children's drawings . Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 35, 478-486 .

Freeman, N. H. (1980). Strategies of representation in young children. New York: Academic Press .

Freeman, N. H. , Eiser, C. , & Sayers, J. (1977). Children's strategies in producing 3-D relationships on a 2-D surface . Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 23, 305-314 .

Freeman, N. H. & Janikoun, R. (1972). Intellectual realism in children's drawings of a familiar object with distinctive features . Child Development, 43, 1116-1121 .

10.

Light, P. H. & MacIntosh, E. (1980). Depth relationships in young children's drawings . Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 30, 79-87 .

11.

Luquet, G. H. (1927). Le dessin enfantin. Paris: Alcan .

12.

Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B. (1956). The child's conception of space. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul .

13.

Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B. (1969). The psychology of the child. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul .

14.

Willats, J. (1977). How children learn to draw realistic pictures . Quarterly Journal to Experimental Psychology, 29, 367-382 .

Young Children's Viewer-centred Representations: Drawings of a Cube Placed Inside or Behind a Transparent or Opaque Beaker

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References