Abstract
Referring specifically to early education programs this paper outlines the principal features of two broad paradigms of action research. The first, emphasizing summative evaluation through quantitative group comparisons of intelligence and achievement scores, characterized earlier action research efforts. The second, stressing formative evaluation, process-oriented observational methods, and qualitative information, has emerged more recently. The perspectives comprising this paradigm are discussed in the light of parallel developments in psychology, together with implications for international researchers, funding agencies, and policy-makers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
