Standing Against Bullying: The Role of Teachers’ Support for Victims,and School Connectedness in Bystanders’ Defending Behavior

Abstract

Bystanders’ decision to intervene in defense of victims plays a fundamental role in reducing bullying. Previous research has demonstrated that teachers’ support for victims and school connectedness encourage bystanders’ defending behavior. This study examines the longitudinal associations among these variables within a comprehensive model testing for additive, partial, or fully mediated effects. A total of 363 adolescents (34% females; age M = 13.35; SD = 1.47) participated in a three-wave study. The findings highlight that teachers’ support for victims can indirectly increase bystanders’ actions to help victims, with this effect being fully mediated by students’ school connectedness. Implications for anti-bullying interventions are discussed.

Keywords

Bystanders’ defending behavior school connectedness teacher support for victims bullying bystanders’ intervention

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Acosta

Chinman

Ebener

Malone

P. S.

Phillips

Wilks

(2019). Understanding the relationship between perceived school climate and bullying: A mediator analysis. Journal of School Violence, 18(2), 200–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2018.1453820

Ahmed

(2008). ‘Stop it, that’s enough’: Bystander intervention and its relationship to school connectedness and shame management. Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies, 3(3), 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450120802002548

Aldridge

Ala’I

(2013). Assessing students’ views of school climate: Developing and validating the What’s Happening in This School? (WHITS) questionnaire. Improving Schools, 16(1), 47–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480212473680

Bandura

(1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall.

Bradshaw

C. P.

Waasdorp

T. E.

Debnam

K. J.

Johnson

S. L.

(2014). Measuring school climate in high schools: A focus on safety, engagement, and the environment. Journal of School Health, 84(9), 593–604. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12186

Brewer

S. L.

Jr Brewer

H. J.

Kulik

K. S.

(2018). Bullying victimization in schools: Why the whole school, whole community, whole child model is essential. Journal of School Health, 88, 794–802. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12686

Burger

Strohmeier

Kollerová

(2022). Teachers can make a difference in bullying: Effects of teacher interventions on students’ adoption of bully, victim, bully-victim or defender roles across time. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 51(12), 2312–2327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-022-01674-6

Burnham

K. P.

Anderson

D. R.

(2002). Model selection and multimodel inference: A practical information-theoretic approach. Springer.

Cappadocia

M. C.

Pepler

Cummings

J. G.

Craig

(2012). Individual motivations and characteristics associated with bystander intervention during bullying episodes among children and youth. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 27(3), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0829573512450567

10.

Carney

J. V.

Liu

Hazler

R. J.

(2018). A path analysis on school bullying and critical school environment variables: A social capital perspective. Children and Youth Services Review, 93, 231–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.07.029

11.

Davies

C. A.

Cordier

Graham

Littlefair

Speyer

Melo

(2025). Interventions to improve connectedness, belonging, and engagement in secondary schools: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Education Sciences, 15(5), 582. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15050582

12.

Dawes

Simpson

Lines

van den Berg

(2024). Interventions to support children after a parental acquired brain injury: A scoping review. Brain Injury, 38(10), 773–786. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2024.2347555

13.

Demaray

M. K.

Summers

K. H.

Jenkins

L. N.

Becker

L. D.

(2016). Bullying Participant Behaviors Questionnaire (BPBQ): Establishing a reliable and valid measure. Journal of School Violence, 15(2), 158–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2014.964801

14.

Devleeschouwer

Tolmatcheff

Galand

(2025). Classmates and teachers matter: Effects of class norms and teachers’ responses on bullying behaviors. International Journal of Bullying Prevention. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-025-00288-3

15.

Dorio

N. B.

Clark

K. N.

Demaray

M. K.

Doll

E. M.

(2020). School climate counts: A longitudinal analysis of school climate and middle school bullying behaviors. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 2, 292–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-019-00038-2

16.

Espelage

D. L.

Swearer

S. M.

(Eds.) (2010). A social-ecological model for bullying prevention and intervention: Understanding the impact of adults in the social ecology of youngsters. In Jimerson

S. R.

Swearer

S. M.

Espelage

D. L.

(Eds.), Handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective (pp. 61–72). Routledge; Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203842898

17.

Evans

C. B.

Smokowski

P. R.

(2015). Prosocial bystander behavior in bullying dynamics: Assessing the impact of social capital. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44(12), 2289–2307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0338-5

18.

Evans

C. B. R.

Fraser

M. W.

Cotter

K. L.

(2014). The effectiveness of school-based bullying prevention programs: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19(5), 532–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2014.07.004

19.

García-Díaz

Urbano-Contreras

Iglesias-García

M. T.

Álvarez-Blanco

(2023). Identification, witnessing and reaction to school bullying behaviour in secondary education. Child Indicators Research, 16(4), 1627–1641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-023-10023-3

20.

García-Moya

Bunn

Jiménez-Iglesias

Paniagua

Brooks

F. M.

(2019). The conceptualisation of school and teacher connectedness in adolescent research: A scoping review of literature. Educational Review, 71(4), 423–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2018.1424117

21.

Gutiérrez

Tomás

J. M.

Romero

Barrica

J. M.

(2017). Perceived social support, school engagement and satisfaction with school. Revista de Psicodidáctica (English ed.), 22(2), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicoe.2017.05.001

22.

Halliday

Gregory

Taylor

Digenis

Turnbull

(2021). The impact of bullying victimization in early adolescence on subsequent psychosocial and academic outcomes across the adolescent period: A systematic review. Journal of School Violence, 20(3), 351–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2021.1913598

23.

Harel-Fisch

Walsh

S. D.

Fogel-Grinvald

Amitai

Pickett

Molcho

Due

de Matos

M. G.

Craig

; Members of the HBSC Violence and Injury Prevention Focus Group. (2011). Negative school perceptions and involvement in school bullying: A universal relationship across 40 countries. Journal of Adolescence, 34(4), 639–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.09.008

24.

Hayes

A. F.

Scharkow

(2013). The relative trustworthiness of inferential tests of the indirect effect in statistical mediation analysis: Does method really matter? Psychological Science, 24(10), 1918–1927. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613480187

25.

Hirschi

(1969). Causes of delinquency. University of California Press.

26.

L.-t.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cut off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

27.

Hymel

McClure

Miller

Shumka

Trach

(2015). Addressing school bullying: Insights from theories of group processes. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 37, 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2014.11.008

28.

Jenkins

L. N.

Bogart

Miskimon

(2022). Contextual characteristics in relation to student intervention in bullying. Journal of Prevention and Health Promotion, 3(1), 97–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/26320770211063630

29.

Jenkins

L. N.

Troop-Gordon

(2020). Bystanders in bullying: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of School Psychology, 81, 47–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2020.07.002

30.

Jiménez

T. I.

León

Martín-Albo

Lombas

A. S.

Valdivia-Salas

Estévez

(2021). Transactional links between teacher–adolescent support, relatedness, and aggression at school: A three-wave longitudinal study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(2), 436. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020436

31.

Jungert

Piroddi

Thornberg

(2016). Early adolescents’ motivations to defend victims in school bullying and their perceptions of student-teacher relationships: A self-determination theory approach. Journal of Adolescence, 53, 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.09.001

32.

Kärnä

Voeten

Little

T. D.

Poskiparta

Kaljonen

Salmivalli

(2011). A large-scale evaluation of the KiVa antibullying program: Grades 4-6. Child Development, 82(1), 311–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01557.x

33.

Konishi

Hymel

Wong

T. K.

Waterhouse

(2021). School climate and bystander responses to bullying. Psychology in the Schools, 58(8), 1557–1574. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22512

34.

Lambe

L. J.

Craig

W. M.

(2020). Peer defending as a multidimensional behavior: Development and validation of the Defending Behaviors Scale. Journal of School Psychology, 78, 38–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2019.12.001

35.

Laninga-Wijnen

Pouwels

J. L.

Giletta

Salmivalli

(2024). Feeling better now? Being defended diminishes daily mood problems and self-blame in victims of bullying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 1294–1322. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12717

36.

Latané

Darley

J. M.

(1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help? Appleton-Century-Crofts.

37.

Little

T. D.

Preacher

K. J.

Selig

J. P.

Card

N. A.

(2007). New developments in latent variable panel analyses of longitudinal data. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31(4), 357–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025407077757

38.

T. L.

Meter

D. J.

Chen

W. T.

Lee

(2019). Defending behavior of peer victimization in school and cyber context during childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic review of individual and peer-relational characteristics. Psychological Bulletin, 145(9), 891. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000205

39.

McCabe

E. M.

Kaskoun

Bennett

Meadows-Oliver

Schroeder

(2024). Addressing school connectedness, belonging, and culturally appropriate care for newly immigrated students and families. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 38(2), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedhc.2023.10.001

40.

Menesini

Gini

(2000). Il bullismo come processo di gruppo. Adattamento e validazione del Questionario Ruoli dei Partecipanti alla popolazione italiana. Età Evolutiva, 66, 18–32. https://hdl.handle.net/11577/1348220

41.

Monahan

K. C.

Oesterle

Hawkins

J. D.

(2010). Predictors and consequences of school connectedness: The case for prevention. The Prevention Researcher, 17(3), 3. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A259750109/HRCA?u=anon~982466d5&sid=googleScholar&xid=dbe096b9

42.

Moore

S. E.

Norman

R. E.

Suetani

Thomas

H. J.

Sly

P. D.

Scott

J. G.

(2017). Consequences of bullying victimization in childhood and adolescence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World Journal of Psychiatry, 7(1), 60–72. https://doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v7.i1.60

43.

Muthén

B. O.

(1998–2010). Mplus users guide (6th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.

44.

Nappa

M. R.

Palladino

B. E.

Nocentini

Menesini

(2021). Do the face-to-face actions of adults have an online impact? The effects of parent and teacher responses on cyberbullying among students. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18(6), 798–813. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2020.1860746

45.

Nocentini

Menesini

Salmivalli

(2013). Level and change of bullying behavior during high school: A multilevel growth curve analysis. Journal of Adolescence, 36(3), 495–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.02.004

46.

Oldenburg

van Duijn

Veenstra

(2018). Defending one’s friends, not one’s enemies: A social network analysis of children’s defending, friendship, and dislike relationships using XPNet. PLOS ONE, 13(5), Article e0194323. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194323

47.

Olweus

(1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Blackwell Publishing.

48.

Peng

Low

(2025). We need a village: School connectedness empowers students to move beyond bystanding under an anti-bullying climate. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 55, 384–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-025-02249-x

49.

Prananto

Cahyadi

Lubis

F. Y.

Hinduan

Z. R.

(2025). Perceived teacher support and student engagement among higher education students—a systematic literature review. BMC Psychology, 13(1), Article 112. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02412-w

50.

Rivers

Poteat

V. P.

Noret

Ashurst

(2009). Observing bullying at school: The mental health implications of witness status. School Psychology Quarterly, 24(4), 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018164

51.

Salmivalli

Lagerspetz

Björkqvist

Österman

Kaukiainen

(1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1996)22:1<1::AID-AB1>3.0.CO;2-T

52.

Salmivalli

Voeten

Poskiparta

(2011). Bystanders matter: Associations between reinforcing, defending, and the frequency of bullying behavior in classrooms. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 40(5), 668–676. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2011.597090

53.

Strindberg

Horton

Thornberg

(2020). The fear of being singled out: Pupils’ perspectives on victimisation and bystanding in bullying situations. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 41(7), 942–957. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2020.1789846

54.

Thornberg

Tenenbaum

Varjas

Meyers

Jungert

Vanegas

(2012). Bystander motivation in bullying incidents: To intervene or not to intervene? The Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 13(3), 247–252. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2012.3.11792

55.

Troop-Gordon

Ladd

G. W.

(2015). Teachers’ victimization-related beliefs and strategies: Associations with students’ aggressive behavior and peer victimization. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-013-9840-y

56.

van der Zanden

P. J.

Denessen

E. J.

Scholte

R. H

. (2015). The effects of general interpersonal and bullying-specific teacher behaviors on pupils’ bullying behaviors at school. School Psychology International, 36(5), 467–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034315592754

57.

van Gils

F. E.

Colpin

Verschueren

Demol

ten Bokkel

I. M.

Menesini

Palladino

B. E

. (2022). Teachers’ Responses to Bullying Questionnaire: A validation study in two educational contexts. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 830850. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.830850

58.

Velásquez

A. M.

Bukowski

W. M.

Saldarriaga

L. M.

(2013). Adjusting for group size effects in peer nomination data. Social Development, 22(4), 845–863. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12029

59.

Waasdorp

T. E.

Bradshaw

C. P.

(2018). Examining variation in adolescent bystanders’ responses to bullying. School Psychology Review, 47(1), 18–33. https://0.17105/SPR-2017-0081.V47-1

60.

Waasdorp

T. E.

Clary

L. K.

Bradshaw

C. P.

(2022). School climate and bullying bystander responses in middle and high school. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 80, 101412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2022.101412

61.

Williams

Cornell

D. G.

(2006). Student willingness to seek help for threats of violence in middle school. Journal of School Violence, 5(4), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1300/J202v05n04_04

62.

Zambuto

Stefanelli

Palladino

B. E.

Nocentini

Menesini

(2022). The effect of NoTrap! Anti-bullying program on ethnic victimization: When the peer educators’ immigrant status matters. Developmental Psychology, 58(6), 1176–1187. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001343

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB