Best friends differ from other friends in terms of their perceived quality, but much is unknown about features that set them apart. This study examines the stability and reciprocity of friend nominations as a function of their rank. Participants included 580 (312 girls and 268 boys) public primary and middle school students (ages 9–13) in Florida (United States) and Lithuania. Twice during a single academic year, participants nominated and rank-ordered friends from a roster of classmates. Stable friend nominees (i.e., nominated as a friend in the fall and the spring) and reciprocated friend nominees (i.e., friend nominations returned by the target) were ranked higher than unstable and unreciprocated nominees. Among those making five (the median) nominations at the outset, first- and second-ranked friends were more stable and more likely to be reciprocated than fourth- and fifth-ranked friends. Similar results emerged among those making fewer friend nominations. Results did not differ across locations, underscoring the assertion that best friends ought not be equated with other friends in empirical studies of friendship.
BerndtT. J. (1982). The features and effects of friendship in early adolescence. Child Development, 53(6), 1447–1460. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130071
2.
BerndtT. J.KeefeK. (1995). Friends’ influence on adolescents’ adjustment to school. Child Development, 66(5), 1312–1329. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131649
3.
BollenK. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. John Wiley & Sons.
4.
BotS. M.EngelsR. C. M. E.KnibbeR. A.MeeusW. H. J. (2005). Friend’s drinking behaviour and adolescent alcohol consumption: The moderating role of friendship characteristics. Addictive Behaviors, 30(5), 929–947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.09.012
5.
BowkerA. (2004). Predicting friendship stability during early adolescence. Journal of Early Adolescence, 24(2), 85–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431603262666
6.
BowkerJ. C. (2011). Examining two types of best friendship dissolution during early adolescence. Journal of Early Adolescence, 31(5), 656–670. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431610373103
7.
BowkerJ. C.SpencerS. V. (2010). Friendship and adjustment: A focus on mixed-grade friendships. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(11), 1318–1329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-009-9474-0
8.
BrendgenM.MarkiewiczD.DoyleA. B.BukowskiW. M. (2001). The relations between friendship quality, ranked-friendship preference, and adolescents’ behavior with their friends. Merrill-palmer Quarterly, 47(3), 395–415. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2001.0013
9.
BukowskiW. M.HozaB.BoivinM. (1994). Measuring friendship quality during pre- and early adolescence: The development and psychometric properties of the Friendship Qualities Scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11(3), 471–484. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407594113011
ClarkM. L.AyersM. (1988). The role of reciprocity and proximity in junior high school friendships. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 17(5), 403–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01537882
12.
DeLayD.LaursenB.KiuruN.RogersA.KindermannT.NurmiJ.-E. (2021). A comparison of dyadic and social network assessments of peer influence. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 45(3), 275–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025421992866
13.
EhrhardtA. D.HoffmanA. J.SchacterH. L. (2025). Friendships in flux: A daily examination of friend continuity and associations with adolescent mood. Developmental Psychology, 61, 1868–1874. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0002014
14.
FaurS.Leggett-JamesM. P.KaniušonytėG.ŽukauskienėR.LaursenB. (2024). Perceptions of relationship quality that predict friendship dissolution during childhood and adolescence: Social support matters more than negativity. Developmental Psychology, 60(3), 560–566. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001676
15.
FlanneryK. M.SmithR. L. (2021). Breaking up (with a friend)is hard to do: An examination of friendship dissolution among early adolescents. Journal of Early Adolescence, 41(9), 1368–1393. https://doi.org/10.1177/02724316211002266
16.
GilettaM.ScholteR. H. J.PrinsteinM. J.EngelsR. C. M. E.RabagliettiE.BurkW. J. (2012). Friendship context matters: Examining the domain specificity of alcohol and depression socialization among adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 40(7), 1027–1043. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-012-9625-8
17.
GommansR.CillessenA. H. N. (2015). Nominating under constraints: A systematic comparison of unlimited and limited peer nomination methodologies in elementary school. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 39(1), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025414551761
18.
GuimondF.-A.AltmanR.VitaroF.BrendgenM.LaursenB. (2022). The interchangeability of liking and friend nominations to measure peer acceptance and friendship. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 46(4), 358–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/01650254221084097
19.
GuimondF.-A.HartlA. C.CillessenA. H. N. (2019). Differences in internalizing symptoms anticipate adolescent friendship dissolution. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 29(4), 924–937. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12432
20.
HartlA. C.LaursenB.CillessenA. H. N. (2015). A survival analysis of adolescent friendships: The downside of dissimilarity. Psychological Science, 26(8), 1304–1315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615588751
21.
HodgesE. V. E.BoivinM.VitaroF.BukowskiW. M. (1999). The power of friendship: Protection against an escalating cycle of peer victimization. Developmental Psychology, 35(1), 94–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.35.1.94
22.
JeroenseT.VeenstraR. (2025). No evidence of selection or influence on political attitudes: Findings from the Swiss Student Life Study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.0.a964193
23.
LaursenB. (2017). Making and keeping friends: The importance of being similar. Child Development Perspectives, 11(4), 282–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12246
24.
LaursenB.MooneyK. S. (2008). Relationship network quality: Adolescent adjustment and perceptions of relationships with parents and friends. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 78(1), 47–53. https://doi.org/10.1037/0002-9432.78.1.47
25.
LaursenB.VeenstraR. (2023). In defense of peer influence: The unheralded benefits of conformity. Child Development Perspectives, 17(1), 74–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12477
26.
Leclerc BedardL.-A.Leggett-JamesM. P.ŽukauskienėR.KaniušonytėG.LaursenB. (2025). The correlates and consequences of friendship change and friendlessness during late childhood and early adolescence. Journal of Early Adolescence. https://doi.org/10.1177/02724316251343104
LessardL. M.JuvonenJ. (2018). Friendless adolescents: Do perceptions of social threat account for their internalizing difficulties and continued friendlessness?Journal of Research on Adolescence, 28(2), 277–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12388
29.
Linden-AndersenS.MarkiewiczD.DoyleA.-B. (2009). Perceived similarity among adolescent friends: The role of reciprocity, friendship quality, and gender. Journal of Early Adolescence, 29(5), 617–637. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431608324372
30.
LodderG. M. A.ScholteR. H. J.GoossensL.VerhagenM. (2017). Loneliness in early adolescence: Friendship quantity, friendship quality, and dyadic processes. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 46(5), 709–720. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2015.1070352
MerckenL.CandelM.WillemsP.de VriesH. (2007). Disentangling social selection and social influence effects on adolescent smoking: The importance of reciprocity in friendships. Addiction, 102(9), 1483–1492. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01905.x
NewcombA. F.BagwellC. L. (1995). Children’s friendship relations: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 117(2), 306–347. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.306
35.
ParkerJ. G.AsherS. R. (1993). Friendship and friendship quality in middle childhood: Links with peer group acceptance and feelings of loneliness and social dissatisfaction. Developmental Psychology, 29(4), 611–621. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.29.4.611
36.
PoulinF.ChanA. (2010). Friendship stability and change in childhood and adolescence. Developmental Review, 30(3), 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2009.01.001
37.
ScholteR. H. J.OverbeekG.ten BrinkG.RommesE.de KempR. A. T.GoossensL.EngelsR. C. M. E. (2009). The significance of reciprocal and unilateral friendships for peer victimization in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38(1), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-008-9287-6
38.
ShulmanS.LaursenB. (2002). Adolescent perceptions of conflict in interdependent and disengaged friendships. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 12(3), 353–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/1532-7795.00037
39.
SijtsemaJ. J. (2016). Preadolescents and their friends: Similarity in aggression and depressive problems as a function of social status and friendship reciprocity. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 40(6), 565–576. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025415607380
40.
VaqueraE.KaoG. (2008). Do you like me as much as I like you? Friendship reciprocity and its effects on school outcomes among adolescents. Social Science Research, 37(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.11.002
41.
WilkinsonR. B. (2010). Best friend attachment versus peer attachment in the prediction of adolescent psychological adjustment. Journal of Adolescence, 33(5), 709–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.10.013
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
