Research has long been interested in links between affect and cognition. The goal of the present study was to understand associations between momentary working memory performance and individual and partner affect as well as moderators (neuroticism and relationship satisfaction) of these associations. We used data from an experience sampling study with 151 heterosexual older couples (⩾65 years old). Our results showed no evidence for associations between momentary individual affect and momentary working memory performance. In women, two associations were found between partner negative affect and working memory performance: A within-person association with partner negative affect indicated that women whose partners reported more negative affect than usual showed lower levels of average working memory performance. When moderators were included, women showed lower-than-usual working memory performance if their partner reported more negative affect than other men. Follow-up analyses of quadratic effects showed no significant quadratic associations between affect and working memory performance, neither for women nor for men. Taken together, our study showed little evidence for associations between individual affect and momentary working memory performance. For partner affect, associations were found between partner negative affect and lower working memory performance in women. We discuss possible reasons for these findings, including low prevalence of strong affective states in everyday life of older adults.
AshbyF. G.IsenA. M.TurkenA. U. (1999). A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psychological Review, 106(3), 529–550. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.106.3.529
2.
BaltesP. B.StaudingerU. M.LindenbergerU. (1999). Lifespan psychology: Theory and application to intellectual functioning. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 471–507. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.471
3.
BolgerN.LaurenceauJ.-P. (2013). Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. Guilford Press.
4.
BolgerN.SchillingE. A. (1991). Personality and the problems of everyday life: The role of neuroticism in exposure and reactivity to daily stressors. Journal of Personality, 59(3), 355–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1991.tb00253.x
5.
BroseA.LövdénM.SchmiedekF. (2014). Daily fluctuations in positive affect positively co-vary with working memory performance. Emotion, 14(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035210
6.
BroseA.ScheibeS.SchmiedekF. (2013). Life contexts make a difference: Emotional stability in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 28(1), 148–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030047
7.
BroseA.SchmiedekF.LövdénM.LindenbergerU. (2012). Daily variability in working memory is coupled with negative affect: The role of attention and motivation. Emotion, 12(3), 605–617. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024436
8.
CarstensenL. L.PasupathiM.MayrU.NesselroadeJ. R. (2000). Emotional experience in everyday life across the adult life span. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(4), 644–655. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.4.644
9.
CarstensenL. L.TuranB.ScheibeS.RamN.Ersner-HershfieldH.Samanez-LarkinG. R.BrooksK. P.NesselroadeJ. R. (2011). Emotional experience improves with age: Evidence based on over 10 years of experience sampling. Psychology and Aging, 26(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021285
CoolsR.D’EspositoM. (2011). Inverted-U–shaped dopamine actions on human working memory and cognitive control. Biological Psychiatry, 69(12), e113–e125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.03.028
13.
DinkelA.BalckF. (2005). An evaluation of the German relationship assessment scale. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 64(4), 259–263. https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185.64.4.259
14.
DohertyR. W.OrimotoL.SingelisT. M.HatfieldE.HebbJ. (1995). Emotional contagion: Gender and occupational differences. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19(3), 355–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1995.tb00080.x
15.
EllisH. A.AshbrookP. W. (1988). Resource allocation model of the effects of depressed mood states on memory. In Affect, cognition, and social behavior (pp. 25–43). Hogrefe.
GerstorfD.HoppmannC. A.AnsteyK. J.LuszczM. A. (2009). Dynamic links of cognitive functioning among married couples: Longitudinal evidence from the Australian Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Psychology and Aging, 24(2), 296. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015069
18.
GerstorfD.HoppmannC. A.KadlecK. M.McArdleJ. J. (2009). Memory and depressive symptoms are dynamically linked among married couples: Longitudinal evidence from the AHEAD study. Developmental Psychology, 45(6), 1595–1610. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016346
19.
HendrickS. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50(1), 93. https://doi.org/10.2307/352430
20.
HoffmannE.GordoL. R.NowossadeckS.SimonsonJ.Tesch-RömerC. (2017). Living situations of older people in Germany. (3. akt. u. überarb. Aufl.) (DZA-Fact Sheet). Deutsches Zentrum für Altersfragen. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-52367-9
21.
IsenA. M. (1990). The influence of positive affect on decision making and cognitive organization: Some implications for development. In Psychological and biological approaches to emotion (1st ed., pp. 75–94). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22.
IsenA. M. (1993). Positive affect and decision making. In Handbook of emotions (pp. 261–277). The Guilford Press.
23.
IsenA. M. (1999). Positive affect. In DalgleishT.PowersM. J. (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 25–521). Wiley.
24.
JohnO. P.SrivastavaS. (1999). The Big-Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
25.
JormA. F.MackinnonA. J.ChristensenH.HendersonS.ScottR.KortenA. (1993). Cognitive functioning and neuroticism in an elderly community sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 15(6), 721–723. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/019188699390013S
26.
KomulainenE.MeskanenK.LipsanenJ.LahtiJ. M.JylhäP.MelartinT.WichersM.IsometsäE.EkelundJ. (2014). The effect of personality on daily life emotional processes. PLOS ONE, 9(10), e110907. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110907
27.
LangF. R.LüdtkeO.AsendorpfJ. B. (2001). Testgüte und psychometrische Äquivalenz der deutschen Version des Big Five Inventory (BFI) bei jungen, mittelalten und alten Erwachsenen [Validity and psychomettric equivalence of the German version of the Big Five Inventory in young, middle-aged and old adults]. Diagnostica, 47(3), 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1026//0012-1924.47.3.111
28.
LövdénM.GhislettaP.LindenbergerU. (2004). Cognition in the Berlin Aging Study (BASE): The first 10 years. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 11(2–3), 104–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825580490510982
29.
MagenE.KonasewichP. A. (2011). Women support providers are more susceptible than men to emotional contagion following brief supportive interactions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35(4), 611–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684311423912
MemmottT. R.KleeD.OkenB. (2018). Negative affect influences electrophysiological markers of visual working memory in mildly stressed older adults. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 10, Article 148. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnagi.2018.00148
32.
MogleJ.TurnerJ. R.BhargavaS.StawskiR. S.AlmeidaD. M.HillN. L. (2023). Individual differences in frequency and impact of daily memory lapses: Results from a national lifespan sample. BMC Geriatrics, 23, Article 670. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04363-6
33.
MoninJ. K.DoyleM.Van NessP. H.SchulzR.MarottoliR. A.BirdittK.FeeneyB. C.KershawT. (2018). Longitudinal associations between cognitive functioning and depressive symptoms among older adult spouses in the cardiovascular health study. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 26(10), 1036–1046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2018.06.010
34.
MuellerS.WagnerJ.HueluerG.HoppmannC. A.RamN.GerstorfD. (2021). Moody and thin-skinned? The interplay of neuroticism and momentary affect in older romantic couples. British Journal of Psychology, 112(1), 315–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12452
35.
MunozE.StawskiR. S.SliwinskiM. J.SmythJ. M.MacDonaldS. W. S.NeupertS. (2020). The ups and downs of cognitive function: Neuroticism and negative affect drive performance inconsistency. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 75(2), 263–273. https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology/article/75/2/263/4953694
36.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.).
37.
NesselroadeJ. R.SalthouseT. A. (2004). Methodological and theoretical implications of intraindividual variability in perceptual-motor performance. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 59(2), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/59.2.P49
38.
NeubauerA. B.DirkJ.SchmiedekF. (2019). Momentary working memory performance is coupled with different dimensions of affect for different children: A mixture model analysis of ambulatory assessment data. Developmental Psychology, 55(4), 754–766. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000668
39.
NeupertS. D.MroczekD. K.SpiroA.III. (2008). Neuroticism moderates the daily relation between stressors and memory failures. Psychology and Aging, 23(2), 287. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.23.2.287
40.
OberauerK.SüßH.-M.SchulzeR.WilhelmO.WittmannW. W. (2000). Working memory capacity—facets of a cognitive ability construct. Personality and Individual Differences, 29(6), 1017–1045. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00251-2
41.
PinheiroJ.BatesD.DebRoyS.SarkarD., & R Core Team. (2013). nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models (R Package Version 3.1-108).
42.
RandallA. K.SchoebiD. (2015). Lean on me: Susceptibility to partner affect attenuates psychological distress over a 12-month period. Emotion, 15, 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000043
43.
R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (R Version 4.2.1). R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.rstudio.com/
44.
RiedigerM.WrzusC.SchmiedekF.WagnerG. G.LindenbergerU. (2011). Is seeking bad mood cognitively demanding? Contra-hedonic orientation and working-memory capacity in everyday life. Emotion, 11(3), 656–665. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022756
45.
RöckeC.LiS.-C.SmithJ. (2009). Intraindividual variability in positive and negative affect over 45 days: Do older adults fluctuate less than young adults?Psychology and Aging, 24(4), 863–878. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016276
46.
RøsandG.-M. B.SlinningK.Eberhard-GranM.RøysambE.TambsK. (2011). Partner relationship satisfaction and maternal emotional distress in early pregnancy. BMC Public Health, 11(1), Article 161. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-161
47.
SalthouseT. A.BabcockR. L.ShawR. J. (1991). Effects of adult age on structural and operational capacities in working memory. Psychology and Aging, 6(1), 118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.6.1.118
48.
SchmiedekF.LövdénM.LindenbergerU. (2013). Keeping it steady: Older adults perform more consistently on cognitive tasks than younger adults. Psychological Science, 24(9), 1747–1754. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613479611
49.
SelsL.CeulemansE.KuppensP. (2017). Partner-expected affect: How you feel now is predicted by how your partner thought you felt before. Emotion, 17(7), 1066–1077. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000304
SpiesK.HesseF.HummitzschC. (1996). Mood and capacity in Baddeley’s model of human memory. Zeitschrift für Psychologie mit Zeitschrift für angewandte Psychologie, 204(4), 367–381.
52.
WeberE.HülürG. (2021). Affect contagion in daily life is mediated by perceptions of partner affect: An experience-sampling study with older couples. Emotion, 21(8), 1699–1711. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001043
53.
WeberE.HülürG. (2023). The role of relationship conflict for momentary loneliness and affect in the daily lives of older couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 40(7), 2033–2060. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075221138022
