Measuring communication openness within adoptive families: The psychometric properties of the multi-informant Adoption Communication Openness Scale

Abstract

This study investigates the psychometric properties of the Adoption Communication Openness (ACO) Scale. Following a multi-informant approach, the study considered four versions of the ACO Scale to assess the child’s perception of adoption communication openness with both mother and father and the mother’s and father’s perceptions of communication with the child. The validation sample included 331 Italian families, with an internationally adopted child (12–18 years). The factorial structure of the ACO Scale was evaluated through confirmatory factor analyses, leading to a mono-factorial structure with good reliability for all four versions of the scale. Evidence of full cross-relational invariance and partial cross-informant invariance was obtained, as well as convergent and criterion validity. Results confirmed the psychometric properties of the multi-informant ACO Scale in the Italian context and indicated it as a particularly suitable measure to investigate family members’ perceptions of their levels of communication openness regarding adoption.

Keywords

Adoption communication openness child’s and parents’ perception psychometric properties cross-relational and cross-informant invariance

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

K. N.

Rueter

M. A.

Lee

R. M.

(2015). Discussions about racial and ethnic differences in internationally adoptive families: Links with family engagement, warmth, & control. Journal of Family Communication, 15(4), 289–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2015.1076420

Aramburu Alegret

Pérez-Testor

Mercadal Rotger

Salamero Baró

Davins Pujols

Mirabent Junyent

Aznar Martínez

Brodzinsky

. (2020). Influence of communicative openness on the psychological adjustment of internationally adopted adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 30(Suppl. 1), 226–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12464

Aramburu Alegret

Salamero

Aznar

Pérez-Testor

Davins

Mirabent

Brodzinsky

. (2015). Preliminary validation of a Spanish language version of the Adoption Communication Scale in adopted adolescents/Validación preliminar de una dolesc en español de la escala Adoption Communication Scale para adolescentes adoptados. Estudios de Psicologia, 36(3), 626–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/02109395.2015.1078551

Baden

A. L.

Shadel

Morgan

White

E. E.

Harrington

E. S.

Christian

Bates

T. A.

(2019). Delaying adoption disclosure: A survey of late discovery adoptees. Journal of Family Issues, 40(9), 1154–1180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X19829503

Barnes

G. M.

Farrell

M. P.

(1992). Parental support and control as predictors of adolescent drinking, delinquency, and related problem behaviors. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 763–776. https://doi.org/10.2307/353159

Barnes

H. L.

Olson

D. H.

(1985). Parent–adolescent communication and the circumplex model. Child Development, 56(2), 438–447. https://doi.org/10.2307/1129732

Barni

Alfieri

Marta

Rosnati

(2013). Overall and unique similarities between parents’ values and adolescent or emerging adult children’s values. Journal of Adolescence, 36(6), 1135–1141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.09.002

Bornstein

M. H.

Suwalsky

J. T.

(2021). The specificity principle in adoption. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 74, 101264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2021.101264

Brodzinsky

(2006). Family structural openness and communication openness as predictors in the adjustment of adopted children. Adoption Quarterly, 9(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1300/J145v09n04_01

10.

Brodzinsky

Gunnar

Palacios

(2022). Adoption and trauma: Risks, recovery, and the lived experience of adoption. Child Abuse & Neglect, 130, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105309

11.

Brown

B. B.

Mounts

Lamborn

S. D.

Steinberg

(1993). Parenting practices and peer group affiliation in adolescence. Child Development, 64(2), 467–482. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1993.tb02922.x

12.

Claxton

S. E.

Deluca

H. K.

Van Dulmen

M. H.

(2015). Testing psychometric properties in dyadic data using confirmatory factor analysis: Current practices and recommendations. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 22(2), 181–198. https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM22.2.2

13.

Colaner

C. W.

Soliz

(2017). A communication-based approach to adoptive identity: Theoretical and empirical support. Communication Research, 44(5), 611–637. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215577860

14.

Fernandes

Veríssimo

Santos

A. J.

Ribeiro

Vaughn

B. E.

Gastelle

Kerns

K. A.

(2021). Measurement invariance across mother/child and father/child attachment relationships. Attachment & Human Development, 23(1), 56–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2019.1710222

15.

Ferrari

Ranieri

Barni

Rosnati

(2015). Parent–child relationship and adoptees’ psychological well-being in adolescence and emerging adulthood: Disentangling maternal and paternal contribution. Family Science, 6(1), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/19424620.2015.1081005

16.

Goodman

(1999). The extended version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as a guide to child psychiatric caseness and consequent burden. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40(5), 791–799. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00494

17.

Grotevant

H. D.

Rueter

Von Korff

Gonzalez

(2011). Post-adoption contact, adoption communicative openness, and satisfaction with contact as predictors of externalizing behavior in adolescence and emerging adulthood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52(2), 529–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02330.x

18.

Grotevant

H. D.

Rueter

Wrobel

G. M.

Von Korff

(2009). Minnesota Texas adoption research project: Summary of wave 3 methods. http://www.psych.umass.edu/uploads/sites/45/Files/W3%20Summary%20of%20Methods%20042509%20final.pdf

19.

Hawkins

Beckett

Castle

Groothues

Sonuga-Barke

Colvert

. . .Rutter

(2007). The experience of adoption (1) A study of intercountry and domestic adoption from the child’s point of view. Adoption & Fostering, 31(4), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/030857590703100403

20.

Jones

Hackett

(2007). Communicative openness within adoptive families: Adoptive parents’ narrative accounts of the challenges of adoption talk and the approaches used to manage these challenges. Adoption Quarterly, 10(3–4), 157–178.

21.

Kerr

Stattin

(2000). What parents know, how they know it, and several forms of adolescent adjustment: Further support for a reinterpretation of monitoring. Developmental Psychology, 36, 366–380. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.36.3.366

22.

Lanz

Iafrate

Rosnati

Scabini

(1999). Parent-child communication and adolescent self-esteem in separated, intercountry adoptive and intact non-adoptive families. Journal of Adolescence, 22(6), 785–794. https://doi.org/10.1006/jado.1999.0272

23.

Little

T. D.

(2013). The Oxford handbook of quantitative methods. Oxford University Press.

24.

Marsh

H. W.

Hau

K. T.

Wen

(2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(3), 320–341. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2

25.

McCauley Ohannessian

Lerner

J. V.

Lerner

R. M.

von Eye

. (2000). Adolescent-parent discrepancies in perceptions of family functioning and early adolescent self-competence. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 24(3), 362–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650250050118358

26.

Mohanty

Ahn

Chokkanathan

(2017). Adoption disclosure: Experiences of Indian domestic adoptive parents. Child & Family Social Work, 22, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12175

27.

Muthén

Kaplan

(1985). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert variables. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38(2), 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1985.tb00832.x

28.

Oliver

Berástegui

(2023). Differentiation of self in adult adoptees in Spain: The role of family functioning, adoption communication, and age at placement. Adoption Quarterly, 26, 433–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926755.2023.2198516

29.

Olson

D. H.

Portner

Lavee

(1985). Family adaptability and Cohesion evaluation scales (Faces III). University of Minnesota, Family Social Science.

30.

Palacios

Sánchez-Sandoval

(2005). Beyond adopted/nonadopted comparisons. In Brodzinsky

D. M.

Palacios

(Eds.), Psychological issues in adoption: Research and practice (pp. 117–144). Praeger Publishers/Greenwood Publishing Group

31.

Pinderhughes

E. E.

Brodzinsky

D. M.

(2019). Parenting in adoptive families. In Bornstein

M. H.

(Ed.), Handbook of parenting: Children and parenting (pp. 322–367). Routledge.

32.

Ranieri

Ferrari

Danioni

F. V.

Canzi

Barni

Rosnati

Rodriguez

M. R.

(2021). Adoptees facing adolescence: What accounts for their psychological well-being? Journal of Adolescence, 89, 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2021.03.005

33.

Ranieri

Ferrari

Rosnati

Vittoria Danioni

Canzi

Miller

(2022). The mediating role of adoption communication openness between family functioning and the adjustment of adopted adolescents: A multi-informant approach. Journal of Family Communication, 22(3), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2022.2095388

34.

Rosnati

Iafrate

Scabini

(2007). Parent–adolescent communication in foster, inter-country adoptive, and biological Italian families: Gender and generational differences. International Journal of Psychology, 42(1), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590500412128

35.

Santona

Tognasso

Miscioscia

C. L.

Russo

Gorla

(2022). Talking about the birth family since the beginning: The communicative openness in the new adoptive family. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), 1203. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031203

36.

Scabini

Marta

Lanz

(2006). The transition to adulthood and family relations: An intergenerational approach. Psychology Press.

37.

Tabachnick

B. G.

Fidell

L. S.

(2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson.

38.

Tagliabue

Donato

(2015). Missing data in family research: Examining different levels of missingness. TPM: Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 22(2), 199–217. https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM22.2.3

39.

Tagliabue

Lanz

(2014). Exploring social and personal relationships: The issue of measurement invariance of non-independent observations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(7), 683–690. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2047

40.

Tagliabue

Zambelli

Sorgente

Sommer

Hoellger

Buhl

H. M.

Lanz

(2021). Latent Congruence Model to investigate similarity and accuracy in family members’ perception: The challenge of cross-national and cross-informant measurement (non) invariance. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 672383. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.672383

41.

Tobia

Marzocchi

G. M.

(2018). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire-parents for Italian school-aged children: Psychometric properties and norms. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 49(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-017-0723-2

42.

Wrobel

G. M.

Kohler

J. K.

Grotevant

H. D.

McRoy

R. G.

(2003). The family adoption communication (FAC) model: Identifying pathways of adoption related communication. Adoption Quarterly, 7(2), 53–84. https://doi.org/10.1300/J145v07n02_04

43.

Ying

Huang

Guo

Chen

(2015). Parental monitoring, parent–adolescent communication, and adolescents’ trust in their parents in China. PLOS ONE, 10(8), Article e0134730. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134730

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.13 MB