We examine recommendations for three key features of latent growth curve models in the structural equation modeling framework. As a basis for the discussion, we review current practice in the social and behavioral sciences literature as found in 441 reports published in the 19 months beginning in January 2019 and compare our findings to extant recommendations. We then provide suggestions for empirical researchers, reviewing the application of these very popular models, specifically focusing on comparison of alternative change models, time metric and interval features implemented, and the treatment of individually varying time intervals.
AppelbaumM.CooperH.KlineR. B.Mayo-WilsonE.NezuA. M.RaoS. M. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. American Psychologist, 73(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000191
2.
AydinB.LeiteW. L.AlginaJ. (2014). The consequences of ignoring variability in measurement occasions within data collection waves in latent growth models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 49, 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.887901
3.
BaltesP. B.NesselroadeJ. R. (1979). History and rationale of longitudinal research. In NesselroadeJ. R.BaltesP. B. (Eds.), Longitudinal research in the study of behavior and development (pp. 1–39). Academic Press.
4.
BauerD. J. (2007). Observations on the use of growth mixture models in psychological research. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 757–786. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170701710338
5.
BiesanzJ. C.Deeb-SossaN.PapadakisA. A.BollenK. A.CurranP. J. (2004). The role of coding time in estimating and interpreting growth curve models. Psychological Methods, 9, 30–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.9.1.30
6.
BollenK. A.CurranP. J. (2006). Latent curve models: A structural equation perspective. Wiley.
7.
BoomsmaA.HoyleR. H.PanterA. T. (2012). The structural equation modeling research report. In HoyleR. H. (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 341–358). Guilford Press.
8.
BrowneM. W. (1993). Structured latent curve models. In CuadrasC. M.RaoC. R. (Eds.), Multivariate analysis: Future directions 2 (pp. 171–197). Elsevier.
9.
BurnhamK. P.AndersonD. R. (2002). Model selection and multi-model inference: A practical information-theoretic approach (2nd ed.). Springer.
10.
CollinsL. M. (2006). Analysis of longitudinal data: The integration of theoretical model, temporal design, and statistical model. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 505–528. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190146
11.
CollinsL. M.GrahamJ. W. (2002). The effect of the timing and spacing of observations in longitudinal studies of tobacco and other drug use: Temporal design considerations. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 68(s1), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-8716(02)00217-X
12.
CoulombeP.SeligJ. P.DelaneyH. D. (2016). Ignoring individual differences in times of assessment in growth curve modeling. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 40, 78–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025415577684
CudeckR.KlebeK. J. (2002). Multiphase mixed effects models for repeated measures data. Psychological Methods, 7, 41–63. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.41
15.
CurranP. J. (2003). Have multilevel models been structural equation models all along?Multivariate Behavioral Research, 38, 529–569. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3804_5
16.
EstradaE.FerrerE. (2019). Studying developmental processes in accelerated cohort-sequential designs with discrete- and continuous-time latent change score models. Psychological Methods, 24, 708–734. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000215
17.
GhislettaP.MasonF.von OertzenT.HertzogC.NilssonL.LindenbergerU. (2020). On the use of growth models to study normal cognitive aging. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 44, 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025419851576
HancockG. R.StapletonL. M.MuellerR. O. (Eds.). (2019). The reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge.
20.
HarringJ. R.StrazzeriM. M.BlozisS. A. (2020). Piecewise latent growth models: Beyond modeling linear-linear processes. Behavior Research Methods, 53, 593–608. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01420-5
21.
HershbergerS. L. (2003). The growth of structural equation modeling: 1994-2001. Structural Equation Modeling: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM1001_2
22.
HesserH. (2015). Modeling individual differences in randomized experiments using growth models: Recommendations for design, statistical analysis and reporting of results of internet interventions. Internet Interventions, 2, 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2015.02.003
23.
HopwoodC. J.BleidornW.WrightA. G. (2022). Connecting theory to methods in longitudinal research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17, 884–894. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211008407
24.
HoyleR. H. (1995). Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. SAGE.
25.
HoyleR. H.IsherwoodJ. C. (2013). Reporting results from structural equation modeling analyses in Archives of Scientific Psychology. Archives of Scientific Psychology, 1, 14–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/arc0000004
26.
JacksonD. L. (2010). Reporting results of latent growth modeling and multilevel modeling analyses: Some recommendations for rehabilitation psychology. Rehabilitation Psychology, 55(3), 272–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020462
27.
KlineR. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
28.
LairdN. M.WareA. H. (1982). Random-effects models for longitudinal models. Biometrics, 38, 963–974. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529876
McArdleJ. J. (1986). Latent variable growth within behavior genetic models. Behavior Genetics, 16, 163–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065485
32.
McArdleJ. J. (1988). Dynamic but structural equation modeling of repeated measures data. In NesselroadeJ. B.CattellR. B. (Eds.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (pp. 561–614). Plenum Press.
33.
McArdleJ. J.HamagamiF. (1996). Multilevel models from a multiple group structural equation perspective. In MarcoulidesG. A.SchumackerR. E. (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling (pp. 89–124). Psychology Press.
34.
McArdleJ. J.NesselroadeJ. R. (2014). Longitudinal data analysis using structural equation models. American Psychological Association.
35.
McNeishD.MattaT. H. (2020). Flexible treatment of time-varying covariates with time unstructured data. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 27, 298–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2019.1627213
36.
MehtaP. D.NealeM. C. (2005). People are variables too: Multilevel structural equations modeling. Psychological Methods, 10, 259–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.10.3.259
37.
MehtaP. D.WestS. G. (2000). Putting the individual back into individual growth curves. Psychological Methods, 5, 23–43.
38.
MillerM. L.FerrerE. (2017). The effect of sampling-time variation on latent growth curve models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 24, 831–854.
39.
MuellerR. O.HancockG. R. (2019). Structural equation modeling. In HancockG. R.StapletonL. M.MuellerR. O. (Eds.), The reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences (2nd ed., pp. 445–456). Routledge.
40.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.).
41.
NealeM. C. (1998). Modeling interaction and nonlinear effects with Mx: A general approach. In MarcoulidesG.SchumackerR. (Eds.), Interaction and non-linear effects in structural equation modeling (pp. 43–61). Erlbaum.
42.
NewsomJ. T. (2015). Longitudinal structural equation modeling: A comprehensive introduction. Routledge.
43.
PreacherK. J. (2019). Latent growth curve models. In HancockG. R.StapletonL. M.MuellerR. O. (Eds.), The reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences (2nd ed., pp. 178–192). Routledge.
44.
RamN.GrimmK. J. (2007). Using simple and complex growth models to articulate developmental change: Matching method to theory. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 303–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025407077751
SingerJ. D.WillettJ. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis. Oxford University Press.
47.
SterbaS. K. (2014). Fitting nonlinear latent growth curve models with individually varying time points. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21, 630–647. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.919828
48.
ThompsonB. (2000). Ten commandments of structural equation modeling. In GrimmL. G.YarnoldP. R. (Eds.), Reading and understanding more multivariate statistics (pp. 261–283). American Psychological Association.
49.
TimmonsA. C.PreacherK. J. (2015). The importance of temporal design: How do measurement intervals affect the accuracy and efficiency of parameter estimates in longitudinal research?Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.961056
50.
van de SchootR.SijbrandijM.WinterS. D.DepaoliS.VermuntJ. K. (2017). The GRoLTS-Checklist: Guidelines for reporting on latent trajectory studies. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 24(3), 451–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2016.1247646
51.
VoelkleM. C.GischeC.DriverC. C.LindenbergerU. (2018). The role of time in the quest for understanding psychological mechanisms. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 53, 782–805.
52.
WagenmakersE.-J.FarrellS. (2004). AIC model selection using Akaike weights. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 192–196. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206482
53.
WidamanK. F.ThompsonJ. S. (2003). On specifying the null model for incremental fit indices in structural equation modeling. Psychological Methods, 8(1), 16–37. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.8.1.16
54.
WilkinsonL., Task Force on Statistical Inference, American Psychological Association, & Science Directorate. (1999). Statistical methods in psychological journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54(8), 594–604. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.8.594
55.
WuW.WestS. G.TaylorA. B. (2009). Evaluating model fit for growth curve models: Integration of fit indices from SEM and MLM frameworks. Psychological Methods, 14(3), 183–201. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015858
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
