Multifinality, equifinality, and fanning are important developmental concepts that emphasize understanding interindividual variability in trajectories over time. However, each concept implies that there are points in a developmental window where interindividual variability is more limited. We illustrate the multifinality concept under manipulations of variance in starting points, using both normal and zero-inflated simulated data. Results indicate that standardized estimates and effect sizes are inflated when predicting components of growth models with limited interindividual variance, which could lead to overinterpretation of the practical importance of findings. Conceptual implications are considered and recommendations are provided for evaluating developmental changes in common situations that researchers may encounter.
BaguleyT. (2009). Standardized or simple effect size: What should be reported?British Journal of Psychology, 100(3), 603–617. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712608X377117
3.
BiesanzJ. C.Deeb-SossaN.PapadakisA. A.BollenK. A.CurranP. J. (2004). The role of coding time in estimating and interpreting growth curve models. Psychological Methods, 9(1), 30–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.9.1.30
4.
BoultonA. J.WillifordA. (2018). Analyzing skewed continuous outcomes with many zeros: A tutorial for social work and youth prevention science researchers. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 9, 721–740. https://doi.org/10.1086/701235
5.
CicchettiD.RogoschF. A. (1996). Equifinality and multifinality in developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 8, 597–600. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579400007318
6.
CicchettiD.TothS. L. (2009). The past achievements and future promises of developmental psychopathology: The coming of age of a discipline. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50(1-2), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01979.x
7.
CoeR. (2002, September). What effect size is and why it is important. Annual Conference of the British Research Association, University of Exeter, England. Vol. 18, p. 2008.
8.
CookS. H.WoodE. P. (2018). Growth curve models for zero-inflated count data: An application to sexual risk behavior. SAGE Publications. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781526440532
9.
CurranP. J. (2003). Have multilevel models been structural equation models all along?Multivariate Behavioral Research, 38, 529–569. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3804_5
10.
CurranP. J.BauerD. J. (2011). The disaggregation of within-person and between-person effects in longitudinal models of change. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 583–619. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100356
11.
CurranP. J.ObeidatK.LosardoD. (2010). Twelve frequently asked questions about growth curve modeling. Journal of Cognition and Development, 11(2), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248371003699969
12.
FifeD. (2020). The eight steps of data analysis: A graphical framework to promote sound statistical analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15, 1054–1075. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1745691620917333
13.
HolmbeckG. N.FriedmanD.AbadM.JandasekB. (2006). Development and psychopathology in adolescence. In WolfeD. A.MashE. J. (Eds.), Behavioral and emotional disorders in adolescents: Nature, assessment, and treatment (pp. 21–55). Guilford Publications.
14.
LeiM.LomaxR. G. (2005). The effect of varying degrees of nonnormality in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 12(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1201_1
15.
LernerR. M. (2006). Developmental science, developmental systems, and contemporary theories of human development. In LernerR. M. (Ed), Theoretical models of human development. Volume 1 of the Handbook of child psychology (6th ed.) DamonW.LernerR. M., Editors-in-chief. John Wiley.
16.
LewisF. C.ReeveR. A.KellyS. P.JohnsonK. A. (2017). Evidence of substantial development of inhibitory control and sustained attention between 6 and 8 years of age on an unpredictable Go/No-Go task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 157, 66–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.12.008
17.
LiuH. (2007). Growth curve models for zero-inflated count data: An application to smoking behavior. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14, 247–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510709336746
18.
Maerten-RiveraJ.MyersN. D.LeeO. (2014). Studying longitudinal change in teacher practices using the multilevel model and latent growth model with an examination of alternative covariance structures. International Journal of Quantitative Research in Education, 2, 89–112. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJQRE.2014.064395
SchechtmanE. (2002). Odds ratio, relative risk, absolute risk reduction, and the number needed to treat – Which of these should we use?Value Health, 5, 431–436. https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1524-4733.2002.55150.x
22.
SchreiberJ. B.NoraA.StageF. K.BarlowE. A.KingJ. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338
23.
SchulenbergJ. E.JohnstonL. D.O’MalleyP. M.BachmanJ. G.MiechR. A.PatrickM. E. (2020). Monitoring the future national survey results on drug use, 1975-2019: Volume II, college students and adults ages 19-60. Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan, 476 pp.
24.
SchulenbergJ. E.MaslowskyJ.PatrickM. E.MartzM. E. (2019). Substance use in the context of adolescent development. In BrownS.ZuckerR. A. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of adolescent substance abuse (pp 17–33). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199735662.001.0001
25.
SchulenbergJ. E.MaslowskyJ.JagerJ. (2018). Substance use and abuse are developmental phenomena: Conceptual and empirical considerations. In FitzgeraldH. E.PuttlerL. I. (Eds.), Alcohol use disorders: A developmental science approach to etiology (pp. 199–222). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190676001.001.0001
26.
SinclairJ. C.BrackenM. B. (1994). Clinically useful measures of effect in binary analyses of randomized trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 47, 881–889. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(94)90191-0
27.
YuanK. H.BentlerP. M.ZhangW. (2005). The effect of skewness and kurtosis on mean and covariance structure analysis: The univariate case and its multivariate implication. Sociological Methods & Research, 34(2), 240–258. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0049124105280200
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
