Aging-related changes in the association between negative affect and response time inconsistency in older adulthood

Abstract

Negative affect (NA) and positive affect (PA) are established modifiable psychosocial correlates of cognitive health and have demonstrated capacity for meaningful within-person fluctuations based on person–environment interactions, age, and measurement approach. Previous research has shown NA is associated with increased response time inconsistency (RTI), an early performance-based indicator of cognitive health and aging. It is unclear, however, whether PA is associated with RTI and whether affect-RTI associations exist within persons over time or change as individuals get older. We utilized data from a measurement burst study (Cognition, Health, and Aging Project) to explore within- and between-person associations between affect and RTI in community-dwelling older adults (N = 111, M = 80.04 years, SD = 6.30). Affect and RTI were assessed on 6 days over a 2-week period, every 6 months for 2 years. Results revealed a significant association between NA-low arousal and RTI within persons over time. RTI was higher on sessions when NA-low arousal was higher than usual (b = .21, 95% CI [0.08, 0.35], p < .01). This association decreased in magnitude over time (b = −.09, 95% CI [−0.14, −0.03], p < .001), ultimately resulting in increased NA-low arousal being associated with decreased RTI 2 years later (b = −.14, 95% CI [−0.27, −0.01], p < .05). No PA-RTI associations emerged. The results suggest efforts focused on maximizing resource allocation and personalizing cognitive health efforts should consider for whom and when mitigating NA may be maximally beneficial to daily cognition, whereas additional work is needed to determine influences from PA.

Keywords

Affect cognition multilevel modeling intraindividual variability response time inconsistency

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baltes

P. B.

Baltes

M. M.

(1990). Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. In Baltes

P. B.

Baltes

M. M.

(Eds.), Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences (pp. 1–34). Cambridge University Press.

Blessed

Tomlinson

B. E.

Roth

(1968). The association between quantitative measures of dementia and of senile change in the cerebral grey matter of elderly subjects. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 114(512), 797–811.

Brose

Lövdén

Schmiedek

(2014). Daily fluctuations in positive affect positively co-vary with working memory performance. Emotion, 14(1), 1–6.

Brose

Schmiedek

Lövdén

Lindenberger

(2012). Daily variability in working memory is coupled with negative affect: The role of attention and motivation. Emotion, 12(3), 605–617.

Brose

Schmiedek

Lövdén

Molenaar

P. C.

Lindenberger

(2010). Adult age differences in covariation of motivation and working memory performance: Contrasting between-person and within-person findings. Research in Human Development, 7(1), 61–78.

Bunce

Handley

Gaines

S. O.

Jr (2008). Depression, anxiety, and within-person variability in adults aged 18 to 85 years. Psychology and Aging, 23(4), 848–858.

Carstensen

L. L.

Pasupathi

Mayr

Nesselroade

J. R.

(2000). Emotional experience in everyday life across the adult life span. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(4), 644–655.

Cerino

E. S.

Hooker

. (2019). Intraindividual variability in lifespan developmental methodology. In Oxford research encyclopedia of psychology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.345

Cerino

E. S.

Stawski

R. S.

Geldhof

G. J.

MacDonald

S.W.S

. (2018). Associations between control beliefs and response time inconsistency in older adults vary as a function of attentional task demands. The Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby124

10.

Charles

S. T.

(2010). Strength and vulnerability integration: A model of emotional well-being across adulthood. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 1068–1091.

11.

Cranford

J. A.

Shrout

P. E.

Iida

Rafaeli

Yip

Bolger

(2006). A procedure for evaluating sensitivity to within-person change: Can mood measures in diary studies detect change reliably? Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 917–929. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206287721

12.

Diehl

Coyle

Labouvie-Vief

(1996). Age and sex differences in strategies of coping and defense across the life span. Psychology and Aging, 11, 127–139.

13.

Dixon

R. A.

Garrett

D. D.

Lentz

T. L.

MacDonald

S. W. S.

Strauss

Hultsch

D. F.

(2007). Neurocognitive markers of cognitive impairment: Exploring the roles of speed and inconsistency. Neuropsychology, 21, 381–399.

14.

Ellis

H. C.

Ashbrook

P. W.

(1988). Resource allocation model of the effect of depressed mood states on memory. Affect, Cognition, and Social Behavior, 25–43.

15.

Eysenck

M. W.

Calvo

M. G.

(1992). Anxiety and performance: The processing efficiency theory. Cognition & Emotion, 6(6), 409–434.

16.

Facal

González-Barcala

F. J.

(2016). Age-related changes in respiratory function and daily living. A tentative model including psychosocial variables, respiratory diseases and cognition. Current Aging Science, 9(1), 71–76.

17.

Feldman

L. A.

(1995). Variations in the circumplex structure of mood. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(8), 806–817.

18.

Fredrickson

B. L.

(2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226.

19.

Gable

P. A.

Harmon-Jones

(2008). Approach-motivated positive affect reduces breadth of attention. Psychological Science, 19(5), 476–482.

20.

Gable

P. A.

Harmon-Jones

(2010). The effect of low versus high approach-motivated positive affect on memory for peripherally versus centrally presented information. Emotion, 10(4), 599–603. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018426

21.

Hamburg

M. A.

Collins

F. S.

(2010). The path to personalized medicine. New England Journal of Medicine, 363(4), 301–304.

22.

Harmon-Jones

Gable

Price

T. F.

(2012). The influence of affective states varying in motivational intensity on cognitive scope. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 6, 73. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2012.00073

23.

Hill

P. L.

Payne

B. R.

(2017). Don’t forget the person when promoting healthy cognitive aging: Comment on Smith (2016). American Psychologist, 72(4), 390–392. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000105

24.

Hill

R. D.

Van Boxtel

M. P. J.

Ponds

Houx

P. J.

Jolles

(2005). Positive affect and its relationship to free recall memory performance in a sample of older Dutch adults from the Maastricht aging study. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 20(5), 429–435.

25.

Hoffman

(2015). Longitudinal analysis: Modeling within-person fluctuation and change. Routledge.

26.

Hoffman

Stawski

R. S.

(2009). Persons as contexts: Evaluating between-person and within-person effects in longitudinal analysis. Research in Human Development, 6(2–3), 97–120.

27.

Hultsch

D. F.

MacDonald

S. W.

Dixon

R. A.

(2002). Variability in reaction time performance of younger and older adults. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 57, P101–P115. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/57.2.P101

28.

Hultsch

D. F.

Strauss

Hunter

M. A.

MacDonald

S. W. S.

(2008). Intraindividual variability, cognition, and aging. In F. Craik

I. M.

Salthouse

T. A.

(Eds.), The Handbook of aging and cognition (3rd ed., pp. 491–556). Psychology Press.

29.

Kessler

E. M.

Staudinger

U. M.

(2009). Affective experience in adulthood and old age: The role of affective arousal and perceived affect regulation. Psychology and Aging, 24(2), 349–362.

30.

Kunzmann

Grühn

(2005). Age differences in emotional reactivity: The sample case of sadness. Psychology and Aging, 20(1), 47–59.

31.

Larsen

R. J.

Kasimatis

(1991). Day-to-day physical symptoms: Individual differences in the occurrence, duration, and emotional concomitants of minor daily illnesses. Journal of Personality, 59(3), 387–423.

32.

Lawton

M. P.

Kleban

M. H.

Dean

Rajagopal

Parmelee

P. A.

(1992). The factorial generality of brief positive and negative affect measures. Journal of Gerontology, 47(4), 228–237.

33.

S. C.

Lindenberger

Sikström

(2001). Aging cognition: From neuromodulation to representation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(11), 479–486.

34.

MacDonald

S. W. S.

Stawski

R. S.

(2015). Intraindividual variability—An indicator of vulnerability or resilience in adult development and aging. In Diehl

Hooker

Sliwinski

M. J.

(Eds.), Handbook of Intraindividual Variability Across the Life Span, (pp. 231–257). Routledge.

35.

McElree

(2001). Working memory and focal attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(3), 817–835.

36.

Molenaar

P. C.

Campbell

C. G.

(2009). The new person-specific paradigm in psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(2), 112–117.

37.

Mungas

Gavett

Fletcher

Farias

S. T.

DeCarli

Reed

(2018). Education amplifies brain atrophy effect on cognitive decline: Implications for cognitive reserve. Neurobiology of Aging, 68, 142–150.

38.

Munoz

Stawski

R. S.

Sliwinski

M. J.

Smyth

J. M.

MacDonald

S. W. S

. (2018). The ups and downs of cognitive function: Neuroticism and negative affect drive performance inconsistency. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, gby032. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby032

39.

Naragon-Gainey

McMahon

T. P.

Park

(2018). The contributions of affective traits and emotion regulation to internalizing disorders: Current state of the literature and measurement challenges. American Psychologist, 73(9), 1175–1186.

40.

Nesselroade

J. R.

Ram

(2004). Studying intraindividual variability: What we have learned that will help us understand lives in context. Research in Human Development, 1(1–2), 9–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2004.9683328

41.

Park

D. C.

Smith

A. D.

Lautenschlager

Earles

J. L.

Frieske

Zwahr

Gaines

C. L.

(1996). Mediators of long-term memory performance across the life span. Psychology and Aging, 11(4), 621–637.

42.

Phelps

E. A.

(2006). Emotion and cognition: Insights from studies of the human amygdala. Annual Review. Psychology, 57, 27–53.

43.

Pressman

S. D.

Cohen

(2005). Does positive affect influence health? Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 925–971.

44.

Prince

Bryce

Ferri

(2011). World Alzheimer Report 2011: The benefits of early diagnosis and intervention. Alzheimer’s Disease International.

45.

Rast

Hofer

S. M

. (2014). Longitudinal design considerations to optimize power to detect variances and covariances among rates of change: Simulation results based on actual longitudinal studies. Psychological Methods, 19(1), 133–154. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034524

46.

Riediger

Wrzus

Schmiedek

Wagner

G. G.

Lindenberger

(2011). Is seeking bad mood cognitively demanding? Contra-hedonic orientation and working-memory capacity in everyday life. Emotion, 11(3), 656–665.

47.

Robinson

M. D.

Tamir

(2005). Neuroticism as mental noise: A relation between neuroticism and reaction time standard deviations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(1), 107–114.

48.

Röcke

Smith

(2009). Intraindividual variability in positive and negative affect over 45 days: Do older adults fluctuate less than young adults? Psychology and Aging, 24, 873–878.

49.

Russell

J. A.

(1979). Affective space is bipolar. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(3), 345–356.

50.

SAS Institute. (2013). SAS (University Edition). SAS Institute.

51.

Schmiedek

Lövdén

Lindenberger

(2013). Keeping it steady: older adults perform more consistently on cognitive tasks than younger adults. Psychological Science, 24(9), 1747–1754.

52.

Shields

G. S.

Moons

W. G.

Tewell

C. A.

Yonelinas

A. P.

(2016). The effect of negative affect on cognition: Anxiety, not anger, impairs executive function. Emotion, 16(6), 792–797.

53.

Shifren

Hooker

. (1995). Daily measurements of anxiety and affect: A study among spouse caregivers. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 18, 595–607.

54.

Sliwinski

M. J.

(2008). Measurement-burst designs for social health research. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 245–261.

55.

Sliwinski

M. J.

Almeida

D. M.

Smyth

Stawski

R. S.

(2009). Intraindividual change and variability in daily stress processes: Findings from two measurement-burst diary studies. Psychology and Aging, 24(4), 828–840. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017925

56.

Sliwinski

M. J.

Smyth

J. M.

Hofer

S. M.

Stawski

R. S.

(2006). Intraindividual coupling of daily stress and cognition. Psychology and Aging, 21(3), 545–557.

57.

Smith

E. E.

Jonides

(1997). Working memory: A view from neuroimaging. Cognitive Psychology, 33(1), 5–42.

58.

Stawski

R. S.

Cerino

E. S.

Witzel

D. D.

MacDonald

S. W. S

. (2019). Daily stress processes as contributors to and targets for promoting cognitive health in later life. Psychosomatic Medicine, 81(1), 81–89.

59.

Stawski

R. S.

MacDonald

S. W. S.

Brewster

P. W. H.

Munoz

Cerino

E. S.

Halliday

D. W. R

. (2019). A comprehensive comparison of quantifications of intraindividual variability in response times: A measurement burst approach. Journal of Gerontology B Psychology Science Social Science, 74(3), 397–408. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbx115

60.

Stawski

R. S.

MacDonald

S. W. S.

Sliwinski

M. J.

(2015). Measurement burst design. In Whitbourne

S. K.

(ed.), The Encyclopedia of Adulthood and Aging. (pp. 1–5). John Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118521373.wbeaa313

61.

Stawski

R. S.

Mogle

J. A.

Sliwinski

M. J.

(2013). Associations among fluid and crystallized cognition and daily stress processes in older adults. Psychology and Aging, 28(1), 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029813

62.

Stuss

D. T.

Murphy

K. J.

Binns

M. A.

Alexander

M. P.

(2003). Staying on the job: The frontal lobes control individual performance variability. Brain, 126, 2363–2380.

63.

Tetzner

Schuth

(2016). Anxiety in late adulthood: Associations with gender, education, and physical and cognitive functioning. Psychology and Aging, 31(5), 532–544.

64.

van Hooren

S. A. H.

Valentijn

A. M.

Bosma

Ponds

R. W. H. M.

Van Boxtel

M. P. J.

Jolles

(2007). Cognitive functioning in healthy older adults aged 64–81: A cohort study into the effects of age, sex, and education. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 14(1), 40–54.

65.

Verhaeghen

Basak

(2005). Ageing and switching of the focus of attention in working memory: Results from a modified N-back task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology, 58, 134–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980443000241

66.

Verhaeghen

Cerella

Basak

(2004). A working-memory workout: How to expand the focus of serial attention from one to four items, in ten hours or less. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 30(6), 1322–1337.

67.

Ware

J. E.

Kosinski

Keller

S. D.

(1995). SF-12: How to score the SF-12 physical and mental health summary scales. The Health Institute. New England Medical Center, Second Edition.

68.

West

Murphy

K. J.

Armilio

M. L.

Craik

F. I.

Stuss

D. T.

(2002). Lapses of intention and performance variability reveal age-related increases in fluctuations of executive control. Brain and Cognition, 49(3), 402–419. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.2001.1507

69.

Wolff

J. K.

Brose

Lövdén

Tesch-Römer

Lindenberger

Schmiedek

(2012). Health is health is health? Age differences in intraindividual variability and in within-person versus between-person factor structures of self-reported health complaints. Psychology and Aging, 27, 881–891. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029125

70.

World Health Organization. (2014). Social determinants of mental health. Author.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.14 MB