Online exchange of sexual content (“sexting”) is associated with potentially negative consequences, especially for girls. We investigated possible associations between family functioning and girls’ sexting. Italian teenage girls (N = 250; Mage = 16.36 years; SDage = 1.88) completed online surveys that evaluated family functioning (communication, flexibility, cohesion, disengagement, chaos, enmeshment, and rigidity) and five sexting behaviors: (a) engaging in sexting, (b) sexting with a partner, (c) number of people with whom girls share sexts, (d) nonconsensual forwarding of sexts, and (e) sexting for emotion regulation. We found that engaging in sexting, sexting for emotion regulation, and the number of people with whom girls share sexts were predicted by age and low family communication. Sexting with a partner was predicted by age and high flexibility, and nonconsensual forwarding of sexts was positively predicted by enmeshment.
BaioccoR.CacioppoM.LaghiF.TafàM. (2013). Factorial and construct validity of FACES IV among Italian adolescents. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 22, 962–970. doi:10.1007/s10826-012-9658-1
3.
Barrense-DiasY.BerchtoldA.SurisJ. C.AkreC. (2017). Sexting and the definition issue. Journal of Adolescent Health, 61, 544–554. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.05.009
4.
BatesS. (2017). Revenge porn and mental health: A qualitative analysis of the mental health effects of revenge porn on female survivors. Feminist Criminology, 12, 22–42. doi:10.1177/1557085116654565
5.
BaumrindD. (1995). Child maltreatment and optional caregiver in social contexts. New York, NY: Garland.
6.
BeniniS. (2012). Televised bodies: Berlusconi and the body of Italian women. Journal of Italian Cinema & Media Studies, 1, 87–102. doi:10.1386/jicms.1.1.87_1
7.
BianchiD.MorelliM.BaioccoR.ChirumboloA. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Sexting Motivations Questionnaire for adolescents and young adults. Rassegna di Psicologia, 33, 5–18. doi:10.4558/8067-01
8.
BianchiD.MorelliM.BaioccoR.ChirumboloA. (2017). Sexting as the mirror on the wall: Body-esteem attribution, media models, and objectified-body consciousness. Journal of Adolescence, 61, 164–172. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.10.006
9.
BianchiD.MorelliM.BaioccoR.ChirumboloA. (2019). Individual differences and developmental trends in sexting motivations. Current Psychology, 1–10. doi:10.1007/s12144-019-00398-4
10.
BianchiD.MorelliM.NappaM. R.BaioccoR.ChirumboloA. (2018). A bad romance: Sexting motivations and teen dating violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33, 1–21. doi:10.1177/0886260518817037
11.
BryceJ.KlangM. (2009). Young people, disclosure of personal information and online privacy: Control, choice and consequences. Information Security Technical Report, 14, 160–166. doi:10.1016/j.istr.2009.10.007
12.
BuhiE. R.GoodsonP. (2007). Predictors of adolescent sexual behavior and intention: A theory-guided systematic review. Journal of Adolescent Health, 40, 4–21. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.09.027
13.
CalvertC. (2009). Sex, cell phones, privacy, and the first amendment: When children become child pornographers and the Lolita effect undermines the law. Commlaw Conspectus, 18, 1–65.
14.
CampbellS. W.ParkY. J. (2014). Predictors of mobile sexting among teens: Toward a new explanatory framework. Mobile Media & Communication, 2, 20–39. doi:10.1177/2050157913502645
15.
ChalfenR. (2009). ‘It’s only a picture’: Sexting, ‘smutty’ snapshots and felony charges. Visual Studies, 24, 258–268. doi:10.1080/14725860903309203
16.
ChongE. S.ZhangY.MakW. W.PangI. H. (2015). Social media as social capital of LGB individuals in Hong Kong: Its relations with group membership, stigma, and mental well-being. American Journal of Community Psychology, 55, 228–238. doi:10.1007/s10464-014-9699-2
17.
Clark NewmanJ.Des JarlaisD. C.TurnerC. F.GribbleJ.CooleyP.PaoneD. (2002). The differential effects of face-to-face and computer interview modes. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 294–297.
18.
CummingsE. M.DaviesP. T.CampbellS. B. (2000). Developmental psychopathology and family process: Theory, research, and clinical implications. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
19.
CydersM. A.SmithG. T. (2008). Emotion-based dispositions to rash action: Positive and negative urgency. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 807–828. doi:10.1037/a0013341
20.
DakeJ. A.PriceJ. H.MaziarzL.WardB. (2012). Prevalence and correlates of sexting behavior in adolescents. American Journal of Sexuality Education, 7, 1–15. doi:10.1080/15546128.2012.650959
21.
DiiorioC.PluharE.BelcherL. (2003). Parent-child communication about sexuality: A review of the literature from 1980–2002. Journal of HIV/AIDS Prevention & Education for Adolescents & Children, 5, 7–32. doi:10.1300/J129v05n03_02
22.
DirA. L.KooC.CydersM. A. (2013). Sexting: A new and emerging behavior of risk. In AssaillyJ. P. (Ed.), Psychology of risk-taking (pp. 151–185). Hauppauge, NY, US: Nova Science Publishers.
23.
DöringN. (2014). Consensual sexting among adolescents: Risk prevention through abstinence education or safer sexting?Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 8, 1–18. doi: 10.5817/CP2014-1-9
24.
DrouinM.CoupeM.TempleJ. R. (2017). Is sexting good for your relationship? It depends…Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 749–756. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.018
25.
DrouinM.TobinE. (2014). Unwanted but consensual sexting among young adults: Relations with attachment and sexual motivations. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 412–418. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.11.001
FeldmanS. S.GowenL. K.FisherL. (1998). Family relationships and gender as predictors of romantic intimacy in young adults: A longitudinal study. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 8, 263–286.
28.
FredricksonB. L.RobertsT. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
29.
GarciaJ. R.GesselmanA. N.SilimanS. A.PerryB. L.CoeK.FisherH. E. (2016). Sexting among singles in the USA: Prevalence of sending, receiving, and sharing sexual messages and images. Sexual Health, 13, 428–435. doi:10.1071/SH15240
30.
HuebnerA. J.HowellL. W. (2003). Examining the relationship between adolescent sexual risk-taking and perceptions of monitoring, communication, and parenting styles. Journal of Adolescent Health, 33, 71–78. doi:10.1016/S1054-139X(03)00141-1
31.
ImpettE. AHensonJ. M.BreinesJ. G.SchoolerD.TolmanD. L. (2011). Embodiment feels better: Girls’ body objectification and well-being across adolescence. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 46–58. doi:10.1177/0361684310391641
32.
KincaidC.JonesD. J.SterrettE.McKeeL. (2012). A review of parenting and adolescent sexual behavior: The moderating role of gender. Clinical Psychology Review, 32, 177–188. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2012.01.002
33.
KlettkeB.HallfordD. J.MellorD. J. (2014). Sexting prevalence and correlates: A systematic literature review. Clinical Psychology Review, 34, 44–53. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2013.10.007
34.
Lapidot-LeflerN.BarakA. (2012). Effects of anonymity, invisibility, and lack of eye-contact on toxic online disinhibition. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 434–443. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.014
35.
LevineD. (2013). Sexting: A terrifying health risk…or the new normal for young adults?Journal of Adolescent Health, 52, 257–258. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.01.003
36.
LongmoreM. A.ManningW. D.GiordanoP. C. (2001). Preadolescent parenting strategies and teens’ dating and sexual initiation: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 322–335. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00322.x
37.
MachimbarrenaJ.CalveteE.Fernández-GonzálezL.Álvarez-BardónA.Álvarez-FernándezL.González-CabreraJ. (2018). Internet risks: An overview of victimization in cyberbullying, cyber dating abuse, sexting, online grooming and problematic internet use. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15, 2471. doi:10.3390/ijerph15112471
38.
McKenneyS. J.BiglerR. S. (2016). Internalized sexualization and its relation to sexualized appearance, body surveillance, and body shame among early adolescent girls. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 36, 171–197. doi:10.1177/0272431614556889
39.
MedranoJ. L. J.Lopez RosalesF.Gámez-GuadixM. (2018). Assessing the links of sexting, cybervictimization, depression, and suicidal ideation among university students. Archives of Suicide Research, 22, 153–164. doi:10.1080/13811118.2017.1304304
40.
MeyerI. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 674–697. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674
41.
MorelliM.BianchiD.BaioccoR.PezzutiL.ChirumboloA. (2016a). Sexting, psychological distress and dating violence among adolescents and young adults. Psicothema, 28, 137–142. doi:10.7334/psicothema2015.193
42.
MorelliM.BianchiD.BaioccoR.PezzutiL.ChirumboloA. (2016b). Not allowed sharing of sexts and dating violence from the perpetrator’s perspective: The moderation role of sexism. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 163–169. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.047
43.
MorelliM.BianchiD.BaioccoR.PezzutiL.ChirumboloA. (2017). Sexting behaviors and cyber pornography addiction among adolescents: The moderating role of alcohol consumption. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 14, 113–121. doi:10.1007/s13178-016-0234-0
44.
MorelliM.BianchiD.CattelinoE.NappaM. R.BaioccoR.ChirumboloA. (2017). Quando il Sexting diventa una forma di violenza? Motivazioni al sexting e dating violence nei giovani adulti. Maltrattamento e Abuso all’infanzia, 3, 49–68. doi:10.3280/MAL2017-003004
OlivariM. G.ConfalonieriE. (2017). Adolescenti e Sexting: Una review della letteratura. Maltrattamento e Abuso all’infanzia, 19, 119–140. doi:10.3280/MAL2017-002007
47.
OlsonD. H. (2000). Circumplex model of marital and family systems. Journal of Family Therapy, 22, 144–167. doi:10.1111/1467-6427.00144
48.
OlsonD. H. (2004). Family Satisfaction Scale (FSS). Minneapolis, MN: Life Innovations.
49.
OlsonD. H. (2011). FACES IV and the circumplex model: Validation study. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 37, 64–80. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.2009.00175.x
50.
OlsonD. H.GorallD. M. (2006). FACES IV and the circumplex model. Minneapolis, MN: Life Innovations.
51.
OlsonD. H.SprenkleD. H.RussellC. S. (1979). Circumplex model of marital and family systems: I. Cohesion and adaptability dimensions, family types, and clinical applications. Family Process, 18, 3–28. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.1979.00003.x
52.
PaceU.D’UrsoG.ZappullaC. (2018a). Adolescent effortful control as moderator of father’s psychological control in externalizing problems: A longitudinal study. The Journal of Psychology. Interdisciplinary and Applied, 152, 162–175. doi:10.1080/00223980.2017.1419160
53.
PaceU.D’UrsoG.ZappullaC. (2018b). Negative eating attitudes and behaviors among adolescents: The role of parental control and perceived peer support. Appetite, 121, 77–82. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2017.11.001
54.
PluharE. I.KuriloffP. (2004). What really matters in family communication about sexuality? A qualitative analysis of affect and style among African American mothers and adolescent daughters. Sex Education, 4, 303–321. doi:10.1080/1468181042000243376
55.
RenfrowD. G.RolloE. A. (2014). Sexting on campus: Minimizing perceived risks and neutralizing behaviors. Deviant Behavior, 35, 903–920. doi:10.1080/01639625.2014.897122
56.
RiceE.CraddockJ.HemlerM.RusowJ.PlantA.MontoyaJ.KordicT. (2018). Associations between sexting behaviors and sexual behaviors among mobile phone-owning teens in Los Angeles. Child Development, 89, 110–117. doi:10.1111/cdev.12837
57.
RingroseJ.HarveyL.GillR.LivingstoneS. (2013). Teen girls, sexual double standards and ‘sexting’: Gendered value in digital image exchange. Feminist Theory, 14, 305–323. doi:10.1177/1464700113499853
58.
RobertsR. E.BengtsonV. L. (1996). Affective ties to parents in early adulthood and self-esteem across 20 years. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 96–106. doi:10.2307/2787121
59.
SchrodtP.LedbetterA. M.OhrtJ. K. (2007). Parental confirmation and affection as mediators of family communication patterns and children’s mental well-being. The Journal of Family Communication, 7, 23–46. doi:10.1080/15267430709336667
60.
ŠevčíkováA. (2016). Girls’ and boys’ experience with teen sexting in early and late adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 51, 156–162. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.06.007
61.
StrassbergD. S.McKinnonR. K.SustaitaM. A.RulloJ. (2013). Sexting by high school students: An exploratory and descriptive study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 15–21. doi:10.1007/s10508-012-9969-8
62.
TempleJ. R.ChoiH. (2014). Longitudinal association between teen sexting and sexual behavior. Pediatrics, 134, e1287–e1292. doi:10.1542/peds.2014-1974
63.
TempleJ. R.PaulJ. A.van den BergP.LeV. D.McElhanyA.TempleB. W. (2012). Teen sexting and its association with sexual behaviors. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 166, 828–833. doi:10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.835
64.
TrubL.StarksT. J. (2017). Insecure attachments: Attachment, emotional regulation, sexting and condomless sex among women in relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 140–147. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.052
65.
TrumelloC.BaboreA.CandeloriC.MorelliM.BianchiD. (2018). Relationship with parents, emotion regulation, and callous-unemotional traits in adolescents’ Internet addiction. BioMed Research International, 2018, 1–10. doi:10.1155/2018/7914261
66.
ValkenburgP. M.PeterJ.SchoutenA. P. (2006). Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolescents’ well-being and social self-esteem. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9, 584–590. doi:10.1089/cpb.2006.9.584
67.
van den EijndenR. J.LemmensJ. S.ValkenburgP. M. (2016). The social media disorder scale. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 478–487. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.038
68.
Van OuytselJ.Van GoolE.WalraveM.PonnetK.PeetersE. (2017). Sexting: Adolescents’ perceptions of the applications used for, motives for, and consequences of sexting. Journal of Youth Studies, 20, 446–470. doi:10.1080/13676261.2016.1241865
69.
WestJ. H.ListerC. E.HallP. C.CrookstonB. T.SnowP. R.ZvietcovichM. E.WestR. P. (2014). Sexting among Peruvian adolescents. BMC Public Health, 14, 811. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-811
70.
WolakJ.FinkelhorD.MitchellK. J. (2012). How often are teens arrested for sexting? Data from a national sample of police cases. Pediatrics, 129, 4–12. doi:10.1542/peds.2011-2242
71.
XiuqinH.HuiminZ.MengchenL.JinanW.YingZ.RanT. (2010). Mental health, personality, and parental rearing styles of adolescents with Internet addiction disorder. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13, 401–406. doi:10.1089/cyber.2009.0222
72.
YangH.StantonB.LiX.CottrelL.GalbraithJ.KaljeeL. (2007). Dynamic association between parental monitoring and communication and adolescent risk involvement among African-American adolescents. Journal of the National Medical Association, 99, 517–524.
73.
YbarraM. L.MitchellK. J. (2014). “Sexting” and its relation to sexual activity and sexual risk behavior in a national survey of adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 55, 757–764. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.07.012
74.
YoderJ.HansenJ.PrechtM. (2018). Correlates and outcomes associated with sexting among justice involved youth: The role of developmental adversity, emotional disinhibitions, relationship context, and dating violence. Children and Youth Services Review, 94, 493–499. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.08.020
75.
ZurbriggenE. L.RobertsT. A. (2013). The sexualization of girls and girlhood: Causes, consequences, and resistance. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
